Prophecy82

Mehr Schiffe bekommt die Engine nicht auf die Kette. Und wozu Geld in R&D reinstecken, wenn neue Lootboxen kreiren soooo viel leichter ist.

Last time I told them that CVs dont belong into CB. Now we get 2 of them.... I guess its better I pass on doing the survey.....

Tbh. that sounds retarded: 1. How will they test it, if these ships are that obscure? Data influx would take for ever or not suffice, especially given (2n-1) Tier Ships (since they dont participate in Ranked f.e.) 2. If they are unpopular their popularity wouldnt rise by not having ASW. 3. All this testing happens on ships ppl have most likely paid for (I paid for the Needle) which... OK forget that, WG disgrunteling paying customers inst smth new.

well for some reason my T4 French DD does not have DCs either ... can T4 ships get into T6 matches ? I really don't know .... Clemson has no DCs either. I dont think any T4 DD has DCs

Can your "clan" [WG] field 7 players? Why dont you guys play vs some good clans in the training room just for the lols. Take 2xBB and show us how not to get completely dumpstered by 2 Ryujos or Löwenharts.

Personally I learned, that on days like this (patchday/weekends) its the best not to play or grab a buddy and play the most toxic/broken/OP div-comp you can field. We tend to play from T4 to T10 in one line (7 games). Starting with Arcancer Beta and Clemson to 2x GC until we reach T10 with 2xMino (smoke/radar). It aint much, but the best way to stay sane.

And what did you learn from that?

But then you cant beg anyone for "intelligence data"... you really want that?

Except for these rare moments when you quadruple-cit a new orly.

Cant argue against a historically accurate napkin sketch.... But maybe there were actually ASW on that sketch which were just "forgotten" by WG due to a communication gap? We´ll never know. ...

Why not? Why does it matter if you throw mines overboard or DCs? The alteration model-wise would be marginal if even there at all. Personally I always thought that those rails were for DCs.

Enterprise f.e. was also "nerfed" or altered by the new RP mechanics, since is was a global change that affected all CVs. Same is true for the introduction of Subs. It is a global change which justifies a change in a premium ship.

Seeing the sh*tshow with okhotnik unfold.... and thats only one of the first discovered "communication gaps" ... yup, that dumpster will keep us warm for some time.

It makes sense that Tachibana has none, since you cant fail-div hard enough to see subs. But T4 DDs without ASW is already questionable since you can easily fail-div to face subs. Also, what about if I decide to create a 3 Okhotnik division (its not that unreasonable since Ive already done that) and there are no other DDs on my side?

Like the one time where all summer sale Containers had a perma camo!

No! This is complete BS. Okhotnik is a DD so you give it ASW! End of story. I dont give a flying fuzz about any reasoning. Just do it! Since there is absolutely no reason why it shouldnt have it. Removed

It used to be 11km, now its 10km range. And that on a quite underwhelming ship. Was that on purpose or just communication gap?

AND historically accurate!

I checked the other T5 Prems I have, Hill and Chiroco have ASW. Heres the deal: Give Okhotnik 6km Torps as compensation.

Luckily I have the OG Cossack. Only cost me 1€. Good ol´times when WG wasnt that sh*t.

Lol what??? You want "having ASW on a DD" to be optional as a balancing decision?!?! Are you mad?! Also what do you want to monitor in frigging coop battles? This is beyond stupid.

Gonna be tough tho to put some more weapons on the "Needle of Doom"... but not impossible...

Apparently Sims Black and Cossack Black (in case of Sims I can check later) have no DCs either while the normal ones have them. Might be a communication error tho...