Userext

your suggestion would make it more arcade though. Torpedo aiming system right now has no problems. I really dont see where you are getting troubled with it

the game should have been pirates vs french and british navy

You can retrain them to your new ships. They will not lose their skill points. They will only require about 18.5k exp to retrain. You can retrain your captains to any ship you wish as long as the ship is in same nation

1-what? 2-Modelling is not wrong. Every ship is %6 of their real life size. 50 meters and 100 meters have 50 meter diffrence. Now if we divide it by 10 the diffrence will go down to 5meters. Which means it will be easier to make 5meter one look at same lenght as 10meter 3-It takes a long [edited]time to create content. A battleship alone takes 6-7 months to make.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Leyte_Gulf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Pearl_Harbor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Philippine_Sea i never said 30vs1 BB.

And i pointed out that the real life also had 533 to 38 kind of ratio. And we dont have that in game. As i said unelss you dont want a 100vs100 battle with %90 of fleet is made up from DDs you shouldnt even think about this.

guys i just realised these informations we have here are old stats. They are completly changed. Tier 10 SNDD has 7.9km detection range with 10km torp range for example.

farragut en azından topa sahip. 5x1 127mm 12 RPM en fazla 12.1km menzil Mutsuki 4x1 127mm RPM ya da 2x1 127mm 10.9RPM en fazla 7.6km menzil

SNDDs arent OP they are balanced USNDDs have better torpedoes

nope. Planes damn it planes!

The MM is messing up about that too much. I really dont know why but when i get in a battle with my mutsuki it goes like this 3vs3 1vs0 4vs5 1vs2 MM isnt just throwing the ships to battles in a balanced amount. weird

that ship was on sale aalone for a long time.... like a really long time

It does apply to wows. Its your problem if you cant play the game good. If you cant follow the battle in a freaking slow [edited]battleship you should just quit. Battleship is the 2nd highest situational awarness potential class. You can fail to follow the map and all other information game gives you in a CA or DD when you are under fire but that does not exist for battleships. You can stand in your place without worrying too much. And if you still fail to have a good situational awarness dont complain about the game. So you are asking for a buff to secondaries and you also think they should reinforce the weak walls a battleship has? my god you are ignorant. You dont ask for balance in game you ask for a OP class. Dont mix balance and OP together. The last line just makes me laugh. CVs are completly luck on defending itself? get this guy out of here

Hello people of the closed beta. You might know me from various posts. I never liked what was going between shimakaze and gearing. And now gearing seems like buffed. The only parts where shimakaze is better than gearing are 5 more torps, 2100 k more damage for each torpedo, 3.5 km more range for torps(i dont know why 20 km would be usefull but...) maneuverability. Upgraded torps gives you 3k more damage and 5km less range(how is this upgrade?) Consealment is same For guns gearing is of course much better. AA is better for gearing Speed shimakaze(40) better than gearing(37) Turning radius Gearing is better with 50 m diffrence(640-690) Rudder shift time shimakaze is better with 0.3 diffrence(3.9-4.2) About the torpedo reload time i think they are both at 150 sec but dont know why it says 0.3 still for shimakaze i saw a shimakaze captain the battle and he told me about shimakaze's reload time i guess they havent updated stats Before 3.1 they had diffrent consealment values gearing had a worse consealment so i was kinda okay with it before but now since gearing is buffed i dont know what makes the line more clear. Maybe one more shimakaze buff? I know shimakaze is buffed because it used to have 180 sec reload(supposed to be 200 depending on 0.3 rof but oh well) now it has 150 sec reload. But gearing already had that before. I dont have the shimakaze yet no. I could only reach hatsuharu and i m close to getting fubuki but i m kinda missing the point here. Why would someone go for shimakaze instead of gearing? There is not a lot of diffrence it makes when you get shimakaze and gearing is much better now.

And again USN had 533 total destroyers in WW2 while USN had 38 battleships. Now think about this very very slowly. Do you really want a battle 100v100 where %90 of fleet is DD? No?

AKA its a balanced tier 10 DD. There will be a lot of crying in the forums. But thats due to wargaming not giving people a balanced gameplay.

If you take a ship launched torpedo in gearing you should sell the ship. If you take shimakaze torp in gearing you should quit the game

daha detaylı olmak gerekirse 5 dakikadan sonra çoğu sınırlama düşüyor.

ırkçılığa karşı sert bir tepkisi var WG'nin. Irklara ve uluslara küfür etmemelisin. mutsuki ye gelince sen daha dur fubuki 35 knot hıza sahip. O tierdeki kruvazörler 33-34 knot hıza sahip zaten.

USN had 533 total destroyers. USN had 38 total battleships. The real chance of spotting for 24 inch(610mm) torps never existed. They didnt leave trail at all

to be fair there were a lot of destroyers build in WW2. So Unless you want games with 40vs40 where 30 of each team are DDs....

Oh look another empty skull... Do you know the word luck? It exist everywhere in life. "Chess doesnt have RNG!" Do you even know whats RNG? Its a system based on luck. Chess has luck system. How? Well i dont know maybe because i know the history of chess. You can search on internet. Best chess player in the world beats a computer. How can a human beat a computer? Was it skill? Oh come on a human brain against a computer that is designed to create best moves against his opponents moves.... That my friend is luck. "ITS NOT LUCK ITS YOUR FAULT!!" So you jumped on a DD captains' lap and you say this? Oh the irony Also dont take words out of my sentences and make castle out of them filled with your lies. Battleship gameplay is a lot like chess. You start with a bad move its hard ot recover. Please oh please dont even think about making assumptions over chess. Its obvious that you dont play chess. You have a brain use it. Your brain is more effective than secondaries. Are you going to complain about life relying on too much luck?

Size saygısızlıktan değil ancak bu durumlarda nitel değil nicel gözlem önemli oluyor. Exp ve kredi kazanma sistemi farklı WoT daki gibi sizden düşük tierler hedefiniz ise daha az kazanırken sizden yüksek tierler hedefiniz ise daha fazla kazanıyorsunuz. Ancak WoT un aksine burada hasar miktarı değil yüzdesi(%) önemli. Yani tier 5 kongo nun bir tier 6 Fusoya %100 hasar vererek öldürmesi bir tier 6 mutsukiye %100 hasar vererek öldürmesine denk. Bu gibi değişikler oyunculara bildirilmeden yapılmıyor. Bir örnek vereyim. CBT den sonra bazıları %100 kazanma oranına sahipken bazıları %0 kazanma oranına sahipti. Açıklaması; kötü savaşlarınız olabilir ama önemli olan net sonucunuz. 10 savaşta kötü yaptım sorun var diye atılmayın hemen. Ayrıca ben şimdiye kadar hiç "kredi ve exp kazanma arttı mı?" diye bir başlık görmedim. Çünkü kimse işler iyi gidiyorsa bunu söylemiyor

i dont think gazelle would want to play with lion If you didnt understand: Cruisers are food for battleships. I dont care how you clubbed that noob battleseal captain. It is an "I WIN" button. There is no challange other than firing at eachother. Pretty much like someone from wot asking an arty only mode including engine broken heavy tanks out in the open.

Buddy if you want a game with a giant WIN button on it i am sure we can find you something at steam inde games. Stop complaining about challanges in every game. Grow up and learn how to take a punch.