Userext

have you seen their wot chats?

[edited]

Bad players cant reach that high. I am not sure but i guess the star protection is up to 20 or 15 they cant progress from that if they are bad. And they possibly came to that rank by his team acrrying his [edited]soooo yeah

Irkçı bir isim olsaydı belki (MarsAtlantis-EnverPasa) ama sanmıyorum. Seçimden sonra düşmeye başlar EUR-TL farkı o da düşerse 25tlye düşer

Resklessu nun da belirttiği gibi bahsedilen yetenek 4 yetenek puanı gerektiriyor. Bir ek olarak da atlanta bir premium gemidir. Premium gemilere geçen kaptanların tekrar eğitilmesi gerekmiyor. Bu yeteneğe sahip bir kaptan varsa atlantaya aktarıp oynanabilir işiniz bittiğinde de asıl gemisine geri konabilir. Skill ProgressionEdit This chart shows the experience requirements for your ship commander to achieve certain levels. One skill point is earned each time your ship commander levels up. Level Skill Points Next Level XP Total XP 1 0 1200 0 2 1 1300 1200 3 2 1500 2500 4 3 2100 4000 5 4 3400 6100 6 5 5800 9500 7 6 9600 15300 8 7 16000 24900 9 8 25000 40900 10 9 37000 65900 11 10 53000 102900 12 11 74000 155900 13 12 102000 229900 14 13 136000 331900 15 14 179000 467900 16 15 231000 646900 17 16 294000 877900 18 17 369000 1171900 19 18 9999999 11171899 20 19 Wiki den aldığım bu tabloya göre 10 skill kaptan 65.9k exp istiyor en az. Bir kaptanın ortalama 500 exp aldığını düşünürsek 130 savaşa 10 yetenekli kaptan çıkarabilir. bu arada 500 exp biraz düşük bir rakam olur

Eleştiri sadece olumsuz olmaz. Eleştiri bir konu hakkında yorumunu belirtmektir. Yanlış anlaşılmasın diye düzeltmek istedim. Bu arada serbest deneyim puanı savaş içerisinde aldığınız saf deneyim puanının(takım arası karşılaştırmada sahip olduğunuz dp) %5 i kadar olur her maç

There is no need for that. If you are good you will improve eventually.

These words are empty so stop saying stuff like this. It is not diffrent from people before this update saying SNDDs are going to be OP On which world exactly? At tier 10 and 9 USNDDs and SNDDs have same average damage Between tier9 and tier4 SNDDs have more average damage (especially kiev with 31k average damage vs hats23k and mahan19k) Tier2-3-4 have under 1000 damage diffrence Next week it will be more clear. I expect the 2-3-4 tiers to be having worse stats and rest of the line to be having better stats next week. SNDDs dont suck matey. As developers said before they dont want people to be able to play all classes Since you play %60 cruisers and only %4.89(ignoring gremmy) of your 470 battles its not a suprise that you fail to play. Oh another thing is that you only have tier 2 SNDD 8 battles tier 3 IJNDD 8 battles tier 2 IJNDD 5 battles tier 2 USNDD 2 battles i doubt you can make a clear review.

no actually they are doing in between teh USDDs and IJNDDs average damage wise and better than both at winrate wise. Oh we shouldnt forget that their average exp isnt bad except tier9(no idea why) For example tier 6 SNDD has better winrate, average damage, average exp than both nations For example tier 7 SNDD has better winrate, average damage, average exp than both nations Of course the stats i have are for 17-24 of october so next week(24-31) it will be more clear if they are good or bad BTW i love the way you say "underperforming USNDD branch" while USNDDs are doing better in average winrate and same at average exp

Kagero has 2x4 torpedoes its fubuki that has 3x3 That and the module health for DDs should be increased. I lost 7 engines in a 5 second repair time(8 if we count the engine that broke and caused me to repair it). Right now the easiest to dodge torpedoes are at high tiers(12.1 seconds reaction time) while hardest to dodge torpedoes are at low tiers(6 seconds reaction time) what kind of balance is this? We dont see BBs getting worse aim the higher tier they get so why DDs are forced with this kind of bs?

As i said in another thread people are whining people are admiring non of these matters. According to stats they are doing great.

I dont think thats a big problem. There isnt a big change between tiers for cruisers. This also applies to DDs and half of BBs(1 tier diffrence not a big problem 2 tier diffrence can be a big problem)

losing modules is like taking candy from a baby in all DDs. Not just SNDDs. although i didnt play SNDDs yet i wanted to see the performance these ships have It will of course be better to check 24-31 stats but all we have right now is 17-24 stats(EU is getting calculated so for now NA stats Player Average for Ships (all players) [ at 2015/10/24 ] nation class tier name players total battles average of rates battles win draw lose exp damage caused warship destroyed aircraft destoryed base capture base defense survived kill / death point JP DD 2 TachibanaLima 6 42 7.00 62.56 0.00 37.44 626 13469 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.36 12.00 1.50 12566 JP DD 2 Umikaze 136501 897111 6.57 51.89 0.64 47.46 490 12699 0.71 0.00 0.80 2.95 19.80 0.97 13105 JP DD 3 Wakatake 106026 1187318 11.20 49.97 1.85 48.18 546 15964 0.71 0.01 0.79 2.08 18.85 0.99 18539 JP DD 4 Isokaze 70197 1488243 21.20 49.41 4.08 46.51 685 22060 0.81 0.06 1.05 1.55 22.52 1.17 23886 JP DD 5 Kamikaze 1898 8158 4.30 52.31 0.94 46.75 804 21866 0.78 0.00 0.31 0.14 24.83 1.03 10262 JP DD 5 Minekaze 39317 1525590 38.80 50.26 4.07 45.67 812 28209 0.93 0.08 1.16 1.41 26.77 1.45 28109 JP DD 6 Mutsuki 17921 722335 40.31 47.29 4.24 48.47 844 21079 0.57 0.39 1.08 0.91 28.01 0.91 26796 JP DD 7 Hatsuharu 6002 292259 48.69 48.63 3.79 47.59 1045 23463 0.60 0.39 0.97 1.27 31.29 0.99 28570 JP DD 8 Fubuki 1970 125019 63.46 48.14 3.70 48.17 1202 29266 0.62 0.37 0.84 1.20 34.30 1.07 30022 JP DD 9 Kagero 610 37962 62.23 46.13 3.51 50.36 1362 38631 0.63 0.34 0.99 1.39 43.28 1.33 29108 JP DD 10 Shimakaze 401 23427 58.42 45.19 3.15 51.66 1441 49782 0.71 0.44 0.73 1.16 42.55 1.51 25156 SN DD 2 Storozhevoi 20493 78314 3.82 50.97 0.13 48.90 347 8552 0.62 0.00 0.13 0.30 17.50 0.78 9699 SN DD 3 Derzki 7214 40070 5.55 51.20 0.95 47.84 418 11826 0.66 0.00 0.27 0.42 13.83 0.80 11892 SN DD 4 Izyaslav 1594 11650 7.31 50.53 1.26 48.21 605 16415 0.68 0.05 0.29 0.52 16.21 0.88 13611 SN DD 5 Gnevny 560 4808 8.59 54.58 0.80 44.62 888 23887 0.88 0.17 0.35 0.34 26.10 1.40 16097 SN DD 5 Gremyashchy 12152 223799 18.42 46.85 4.57 48.58 842 20801 0.71 0.27 1.04 3.47 22.21 1.02 17754 SN DD 6 Ognevoi 150 1209 8.06 53.09 0.24 46.67 983 23029 0.70 0.17 0.11 0.09 24.39 1.03 15171 SN DD 7 Kiev 86 1132 13.16 58.24 0.05 41.71 1224 31434 0.97 0.28 0.05 0.07 29.67 1.66 21121 SN DD 8 Tashkent 23 278 12.09 50.43 0.00 49.57 1040 29095 0.62 0.32 0.00 0.00 20.82 0.91 17614 SN DD 9 Udaloi 12 171 14.25 48.28 0.00 51.72 1168 33706 0.62 0.43 0.00 0.00 24.17 1.03 19717 SN DD 10 Khabarovsk 8 165 20.63 52.83 0.00 47.17 1488 38231 0.75 1.00 0.00 0.00 34.72 1.37 22614 US DD 2 Sampson 158109 949213 6.00 48.16 0.62 51.21 404 9516 0.54 0.00 0.54 3.30 12.50 0.65 11921 US DD 3 Wickes 112570 1344546 11.94 46.74 2.94 50.32 474 11601 0.52 0.01 0.51 2.19 11.14 0.62 17411 US DD 4 Clemson 63458 1317231 20.76 47.88 3.79 48.33 561 17361 0.69 0.01 0.72 2.01 14.68 0.87 22313 US DD 5 Nicholas 29832 984687 33.01 46.96 3.72 49.32 757 19530 0.72 0.30 0.64 1.94 15.48 0.91 25111 US DD 6 Farragut 10737 412557 38.42 47.48 3.73 48.79 839 18141 0.63 0.37 0.70 1.70 18.47 0.84 25955 US DD 7 Mahan 2850 129348 45.39 47.92 3.17 48.91 1007 19548 0.64 0.32 0.71 1.43 19.62 0.86 26734 US DD 7 Sims 14554 215102 14.78 42.78 6.58 50.64 827 13681 0.41 0.18 0.88 3.00 16.29 0.52 15002 US DD 8 Benson 849 46160 54.37 48.29 3.75 47.96 1144 24361 0.67 0.28 0.82 1.82 28.65 1.04 28760 US DD 9 Fletcher 333 22417 67.32 49.05 3.37 47.58 1197 33904 0.74 0.66 0.89 2.07 37.67 1.39 30102 US DD 10 Gearing 159 7031 44.22 43.20 3.20 53.60 1354 39270 0.70 0.93 0.48 2.45 33.27 1.29 21336 For now it seems like there isnt something going too bad for SN. But again it would be better if we would check 24-31 stats instead of 17-24 stats

WoWp is more succesfull than any games you can make WoWs player base is increasing we are in "school" time which means the numbers should be going down a lot but instead they are going up Something isnt right thats true. WG shouldnt let everyone reach to each section of forums

nah its just that people are sick of dummies who thinks caste system is the way to balance. The more complicated stuff gets the more balanced it is.

USNDDs are receiving buff at 0.5.1 USNDDs didnt need buff vs IJNDDs they were fine. Maybe farragut but not like an overall buff. After SN came around they required buff. All DDs required a bit of love No CAs dont need buff they are the best balanced class in game. Well at least they dont need a class buff maybe one or two ships have some of their shipt wrong high tier CAs are 2nd at winrate 3rd at average damage 3rd at average exp 3rd at kill/death ratio low tier CAs are 3rd at win rate 3rd at average exp 3rd at average damage 4th at kill/death ratio Average exp wise EU server G>S Tier 10 K>Fl Tier 9 B>Fu Tier 8 M>H Tier 7 F>M Tier 6 M>N Tier 5 USNDDs IJNDDs

Gotta love people trying to teach a succesfull gaming company how to game....

No? Gearing isnt the worst tier 10 http://www.warshipstats.com/analytics/ According to EU server stats des moines ahs the least amount of average exp. Shimakaze is the 2nd last and Zao is 3rd last while gearing is the 4th last Des moines is %100 the worst tier 10 Right now as sharana admitted in another thread they removed the exp gained from capturing flags. Which is the basic role of gearing. It will be back at 0.5.1

OK lets rewind this. IJNDDs vs USNDDs dont have much problem. Yes i still think it is a mistake to make a nation counter other nation but right now only little bits of IJNDD line is requiring buff to match USNDD(mutsuki as a whole hatsuharu is fine fubuki and kagero need speed buff) But hello 0.5.1 patch they are buffing USNDDs. They will give more torpedo range and RoF buff to fletcher+benson. Yeah sure USNDDs need buff to compete with SNDDs but that doesnt mean they should throw IJNDDs into trash does it?

wrong thread? I dont remember such thing. After 0.4.0 launched there was no major change at all until 0.4.1

*facepalm* oh how i love ignorant people say these.

I dont understand the problem. Its same with torpedoes vs straight liner. Just dont sail in a straight line and try to change your speed(CAs are faster than BBs so i suggest try to stay at 3/4 of your max speed the closer you are the more shells you receive)

they still didnt buff rudder shift times since 0.3.1 At 0.4.1 test server there was a glitch in UI that showed wrong numbers. An unupgraded amagi had 12 secs on paper. But Ev1n said that the values are only wrong on the UI there was no change for its movement. You probably didnt check on that

I agree that but what can yo do? They dont want a Zeus in game. They dont want a titants' clash in game. Would be fun for tier 11 idea though. Short explanation: they dont want you to be super sharp sword. Are you going to blame your teacher too? "Oh teacher i suck at math, i dont study math i can get bad results but you cant judge me for that!" No sunshine results ARE there to judge your performance. It doesnt take skill to know yourself. Dont ignore your results they are showing what you actually are. Can you believe there were people before 0.4.1 that claimed CVs were UP? They sucked at CVs they claimed CVs arent OP. What will you say to them?

The information i have isnt much diffrent than the real. BTW the last hull buffs rudder shift time forgot to add that (Cant add all in same reply)