Userext

this is iceberg situation all over again instead of alarm going off when a friendly DD launches torps maybe the torpedo signal distance should be wider you know like we can see that planes in front of our screen from 16km away the sign for friendly torpedoes can pop up for 5 km range maybe?

that japanese tier 4 battleship might be it

For lazy people H39 and H41 stats From what i read about H41 it will be heavily armoured it will be hard to do citadel hits cruiser-battleship type turrets(turns fast reloads fast etc) H41 had good protection against mines so it has a heavily armoured part under the ship

so CBT testers will get a gift ship? yay correct me if i m wrong So after CBT they will wipe our accounts and give us our bought(pre order) ships and tokens back and as an extra will they give a gift ship? thats what you said up there Mr Supertester

wait a second Bismarck is a battleship and germans use manly words for it(they dont call battleships "she") why are IJN BBs called she?

you can be sure when a USN DD that fired torps to a 11km away target is not actually targetting the enemy reported that guy but i m still angry at that sitaution i released my torps without a doubt because there was no one there but this guy was behind me i have IJN DD he has USN DD whoes torpedo do you think will hit? i died my torps kept going at the end of the game i had 25k damage done destroyers should not be at 2nd line or if you are at 2nd line you ahve to warn your allies and consider if those torps ahve possibility to hit someone on their way to the target there is no need for a solution to this it all comes down to DD player's and his ally's attention this isnt wot where you can only watc the middle of screen and get away with it

supporting doesnt mean you should stay 500 meters in front of the BB you need to be around closer to the heat of fight but not too far away from your BB at the end of the day your BB wil be the one who protects you against enemy BB and you will be the one who protects him against sneaky destroyers imagine how romans were fighting imagine how spartans were fighting stay together and you wont break otherwise they will tear your ship down you arent doing a phalanx you arent doing the turtle formation but 50 people who watch eachother's back can beat a thousand

is 3 min to shimakaze's torpedo reload really important ? i know it has 15 torps(3x5) but seems kinda unfair when you think about the carriers and spotter planes you cant spam them anyways

only low tiers spam it no one wants to sit in a shimakaze with 3 min reload DDs will get a big punch at this patch which worries me CAs and BBs are getting a big upgrade against DDs and they havent done anything about plane spotting system if enemy carrier is a normal or good player he will keep a fighter above your head all time to make his team be able to see torpedoes when they are launched

+1

i dont know much about that but i think it will be underdog against Iowa

leave dont play it if you didnt like it you arent making it better right now

it will be introduced from what i remember cruisers and BBs have 1000-2000 shell capacity but dont know about destroyers

NDA thanks for allowing time to check this

i can already hear the voice of rage i can smell the rage tears of solid salt will jingles finally have some more sources of salt ofr his salt mines?

didnt see that..welp

we can turn this topic into "aim helper mod must go" so you can close it

hating the company doesnt mean hating the game you know i know that she hates wg because whenever something happens at wot she shows her true face

dont take my words as an insult(people tend to do this i dont know why) i m a good guy SS has some strong bonds with WG members i dont know where he foud those informations but most of what he said was right after all and this is what he said about giving blog to rita i trust most of these Q&A stuff because it ends up being truth or a staff member explains they changed it etc. Also rita does hate WG a lot but hating the company doesnt stop her from playing the game i check her blog a lot so i know that she hates them

i dont understand what is this all about this ship is just a premium ship dont expect them to make it superior good royal navy doesnt even have its tech tree in game yet bismarck will be in CBT aswell will you complain about that too? come on people these ships are placeholder they will be deleted after wipe and we might not even see them again they are just here to attract some attention to the game also premium ships dont have upgrades which is why we will be seeing a weird bismarck more than the ones you saw in bubbly photos

cruisers and mostly destroyers cap bases thats what i think there is a map called ocean that has no islands its jsut clear water but there are 2 bases BBs have long range armament for a reason buddy

did you read any of SS's posts? he and rita are a bit against WG products so those words are mostly from themalso this is a translation from russian so dont expect %100 accuracy

it is a fact that battleships will have 1 milion health at worst with 6 bilion mm armour and they will nerf torpedoes ITS A FACT PEOPLE BLEIEVE ME cant stop

eries might fail to do it they dont have the penetration for it HE? maybe but nah tier 1s doesnt stand a chance 11 tier 2 IJN DDs? oh baby fireworks!

mtm78, on 10 May 2015 - 10:48 AM, said: The two replies above not withstanding, what do you mean with 'accurately modeled'? You realize that this game is balanced based on gameplay not historical stats? i think he mant that supertesters only plays the game they dont receive any full information about their armour lay outs etc PanzerGert, on 10 May 2015 - 10:51 AM, said: They won't tell you, because they are bound by the NDA and are not allowed to. While I fully understand your interest in the game and getting more information regarding it, it won't happen. If you happen to join the Supertester Team, you quickly would understand why they are not allowed to comment on the super tests. Thank you for your understanding. Could you help us a bit and say if this Q&A actually happend? or something like that? no sir i m not trying to push you to leak stuff out but i m kindly asking please can you tell us if this Q&A has any kind of "right" information?