Userext

http://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/common/open-beta-announcement/

It was said before as complete 50 battles PvP and PvE combined before june 23rd 23:59 Because they thought if you arent doing battles more than 50 you arent really helping the devs therefore dont deserve the present

have you considered maybe you are exaggerating? At long ranges as you would expect there is more chance for shells to go long or short because practicly you aimed a bit wrong. Longer the range is easier to make a mistake Edit: I am not saying that doesnt happen i am saying try getting better. If you cant get any better than you can blame it all on the RNG

IF you aim good its not a guaranteed hit because it aims where you fire. But it goes slow this is why torpedoes have low hit ratio. I didnt say torp from 15-20k away. Why do people get that wrong everytime? I m referring to the torpedo speed. It takes 15 secs for shells to travel 15km. It takes 82.5 secs for torpedoes to go 15km. At that time your target can change direction, slow down or die. So lets say you fire at a target 10km away. it will take 7.5secs for shells to reach there but it will take 55 secs for torpedoes to reach your target. Torpedoes are more accurate correct but being accurate doesnt make it better than shells. Dont fire full salvo or practice a lot before you play.

VAlderan i will ask you to quit this thread there is one below contunie at that please thank you... Edit: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/17187-how-to-equip-the-arkansas-beta/

Reduicing RNG will not help. It will just make it worse. if a BB gets engaged by 2 other BBs teh chances of that guy's surviability depends on him not letting enemies shot his weakspots So try to angle your ship like you do in wot. You will not receive much citadel damage. Also you do realise what happens if all shells penetrate the citadel? lets say Fuso 12x10,800 damage. over 120k damage.... You can kill a yamato if you do 12 citadels in one broadside.

Torps are accurate? Uhm what? Torpedoes dont usually have high hit ratio than %15 but guns have at least %40 hit ratio. You guys seriously need to learn how to shot. Starting from BB isnt going to teach you that. I am not good at BBs. But i can aim good enough because i played DDs mostly. Yes you might think that close range is easier but when you have low health you have to make every shot counted. RNG in battleships are not that bad. RNG at torpedoes is bad. Let alone the hit ratio when torpedo hits it can do magazine damage or just 120 damage(bulk protection) Only battleship whiners that doesnt understand the power of their ship think battleships are downing in RNG At the moment IJN destroyers are just luck machines. You fire your torps target changes course you will miss. you went to the wrong side of map? you cant engage to ships 15-20km away. It takes 110secs ffor a 67 knot torpedo to go 20km do you know what can happen during that time? You probably dont play destroyers much so tahts why you find them better than battleships. Battleship can change the course of a battle a destoryer cant. I have 400 battles on them and i am pretty sure that destroyers have more RNG problems than battleships.

must have confused it with montana's guns. Yet still doesnt change the damage much does it? RNG is same with wot. its %25 here too but hear me out. Artillerity is missing a lot at wot right? then why would you expect a 356mm canon to not miss a lot at 10km while in wot they cant hit anything from 800meters. Seriously if you are going to compare these two game do care about the stats a bit more. a 100mm gun is more accurate than 150mm gun right? well then dont expect naval guns to be accurate. You know how BB players love talking about realism? Well why dont you look at real life accuracy? Most engagements would last hours because they were missing a lot of their shots. Battleships had %5-%10 accuracy at long ranges. I am not a troll i m trying to explain what kind of damage battleship can do. 9x14800 right? every 30sec so that means from 10min full firing you will do 20 broadsides. 180 shells. 2,664,000 damage potential in 10min. For example battleship players usually have around 50k-90k average damage which isnt bad. Having that RNG lowered will be pretty bad. Just drop it buddy. I have seen many people asking that. If you keep missing for god sake get closer you arent supposed to be hunting people from space. Are you one of those map border hugger?

it was 19 before. It probably is still the same

But USN destroyers arent as bad as IJN ones. They get long range torpedoes eventually but shimakaze doesnt get good guns. Oh also USNDDs might seem to have less consealment but that isnt true. They get better the higher they go and at tier 10 both sides get same consealment

Until tier 8 no ship receives that 5 upgrade. At tier 9 you receive the last module and that makes 6 modules at total. I think myogi and wyoming had 3 upgrades.

There is nothing wrong with RNG. You probably arent aiming good enough. But let me show you that if you would have %50 chance to citadel someone. Lets say we have a yamato 12x14800 damage equals to 177,600 damage. That nearly exceeds two yamatoes' health. But we said %50 chance to citadel so lets say only 6 of them did full damage and others bouced off That equals to 88,800 damage. Do you really think that any type of player wants to get killed right away? You battleship players complain about slow and low hit ratio torpedoes being powerfull yet you want more accurate and more deadlier guns? Come on. All you need is aim training

I m suprised that WG put that much upgrade to a tier 4 ship. At least 2 of those upgrades are for high tier ships. I got that 6th upgrade at fubuki(the one with consealment and acquisation) and that 3rd one at my kagero.

was i in a battle with you recently? Also whats your opinion about this crit nerf

i saw a myogi get attacked by 2 torps squadrons... It was brutal. First he thought he can dodge them. But he was unaware of the torpedoes coming from left side of his ship. He turned away from right side and ate 1 torpedo then he realised there are 3 others that will hit him. The weird thing is this was not manual drop he dropped torps away from the target which i think is an easy way to say even with auto drop low tier CVS are powerfull

are you sure that was a bot but not a player? Bots have diffrent names you know. Illegal bots? i doubt that

You cannot speak german at english section of forum. I am saying this in german so you can fully understand me. Sie können kein Deutsch in Englisch Schnitt Forum. Ich sage das in Deutsch, so dass Sie mich verstehen. Hope google translate works good.

Well wargaming finally did it. They nerfed the **** out of destroyers. Good job lads now battleships drivers can happily one shot us all !!!

why do you hate me man

get out of here you filthy person 33 out of 45 battles win(%73 win rate)

its all over again gentelman one side we have BB captains whining and the other side we have cruiser captains talking(cant call that whining)

in wot the easiest ones gives 75k we dont have any over 50k and there is limit for missions

yep OBt launch

i had %0 win rate until my 12th battle. I dont care much about stats but come on i had desync problems which made me suck hardcore but at some games i did good too so i dont know

Also before 0.4.0 torpedoes wouldnt ring the bells right away. Now the verbal warning does effect it a lot. For example in that 11secs ships wouldnt get informed with alarm until 1km but now it verbally warns the second they get spotted. And no this verbal warning doesnt have a short range i heard it while torps were 3-4km away from me getting spotted by a team mate.