-
Content Сount
5,342 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
2957
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Userext
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
I think there is a seperation between bounced and missed. Probably more exp for bounced You see i m not against them implementing spotting and tanking. It would improve the gameplay incredibly only if the game would be in a good state. I say this again increased battleship popularity means BBs are a little OP. It damages the CA amount(yes i play them and not enjoying it right now) while yes more BBs mean better for DDs it also has downsides like them camping at the far back. Because they are too scared to get citadel hits by enemy. -
yep changed it
-
Well gentelman the bet is over the result is
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Because most of us dont trust WG. While yes developers are good if SerB says no its a no. Again pointing out the mighty kagero here. The ship that is underpowered compared to fletcher in every way except concealment. Yet developers still say kagero's situation is okay there is no need for a change. Where did they say that? In Q&A at some interesting info from ru. Spotting could be nice if implemented properly. But again its WG we are talking about here. They are the ones that made WoT what it is right now(wot is in so bad shape they need balance 2.0). Sure you can say its the developers' fault. But we had some fails here aswell. Example? They admit to the increase of popularity at battleships which according to them is close to being too much. But they are still bringing in german battleships which will boost popularity to %50 at the very least. Sure KMBBs nice feast for DDs. Not good for game balance. I know stuff cant happen at one. I know they need to test stuff to properly balance this out before it hits live servers. This isnt exactly good for a game that doesnt have enough popularity to make a big mistake though. Yes i am calling bringing in more battleships while we already have %31 popularity in game a big mistake. They are doing good stuff(fail div cancel). I can see that. But the battleship popularity is breaking game right now. And knowing people if something is highly popular there is something wrong with it. -
Watch the video and then you decide
-
i dont think game supports 4k. You should lower your resolution to something reasonable. I m sorry but WoWs hasnt made full deal with pc master race
-
are you sure? i dont own a flint(duh) but i heard it has radar
-
flint has a radar and a smoke cloud. what else do you need for an atlanta class cruiser to be OP? And only the best of the best got it.
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
If you really think couple of newbies or noobs here and there make the most of DD captains i have no word for you. I repeat myself majority of DD captains already do spot enemies without even trying. So no this isnt a great idea. And they have to redistribute the exp earned due spotting because DDs already get good exp from capping+doing damage. I dont know what you have against doing damage but you basically are calling something that lets your team win "damage whoring" in that case capturing bases would be exp whoring. I m sorry if you are going to talk with this biased idea and your arrogant behaviour there is no reason for me to keep this discussion on any longer. Have a nice day -
my bad didnt check the portal it wasnt said before at 0.5.10 test
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Because as i said over and over again. DDs already do spot enemies. Without actually trying we do spot enemies. This would only lead to maybe increase maybe decrease at exp earned. It isnt going to change anything. And they are going to use this excuse(spotting) to not change destroyers. Example? Kagero -
there wont be german BBs at 0.5.10
-
the only RNGsus effect here is accuracy.
- 99 replies
-
- bug
- damage model
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
They will cut earned exp from other areas to add into this. There is also the plane issue. As i stated long long time ago how are they going to fix the plane spotting? The rule in wot is closest one gets the spotting damage. Soo what happens when CVs decide to spot enemies while staying outside of their AA range? I dont think spotting damage can be implemented here. Most DDs already do passive spotting as others said. -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
again it will just improve exp earned and nothing else -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
how is that going to work? they are basically just increasing exp earned nothing else -
-Bu yamanın bilgileri paylaşılmıştı. Eğer forumları takip ederseniz alman zırhlılarının gamescon etkinliği dolaylarında geleceğini bilirdiniz. -Üst tierler yüksek DP istiyor çünkü insanların hemen üst tierlere geçmesini istemiyorlar bir süre sonra indirirler
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
you missread the whole thing. I didnt see any part where they said they will buff DDs or other T10CAs -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Clans will be added. And to be honest clan wars here will be more fun. Clans controlling trade routes on sees, controlling ports. Other clans raiding your clan's controlled trade route etc -
and then they refitted fubuki because with that speed ship wouldnt be able to sail for long(bow problems) still they should make it 38 knots for the sake of gameplay as they said before gameplay comes before realism and they cant use realism as an excuse anymore
-
You do know radar goes through islands right? also you might be having issue with loading. It happend before a lot in the CBT. There were even cases where a ship as big as Iowa could appear 4 km away from you.Its a server side problem. package loss etc
-
ships like atlanta have radar
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Userext replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Well i say 7 years is a good long time for a free to play game. And WoT can still have more and more tanks with diffrent type. they are just a little too close minded. -
I assume this happens at a "boarding only" server. Otherwise gearing with 36.5 vs 39 can easily catch it due to gun fire. And no 1.5knots isnt enough to put a good distance between you. It would take 25 mins for a 1.5knot ship to go 6 km. And im being very genorous here with upgrade+captain skill. Let say gearing saw shimakaze at 3km. There still is about 12.5 mins before shimakaze can be undetected. if we would say gearing fires only 2 front guns and does 500 damage with each HE shot it can put out 250 shots at that time which is around 125k health. I doubt shima has that much health
-
i already explained what happend. Hello?
