Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Deamon93

Sailing Hamster
  • Content Сount

    3,124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    1275

Everything posted by Deamon93

  1. Deamon93

    Tone down the AA buff

    Thi means something has changed to the planes but i can't say what
  2. Deamon93

    Fan made Italian tech tree

    I changed few things in the tree: -Added the ACs -Changed the tier I(Eritrea seems overall more suitable than Libia) -Added proto Littorio
  3. Deamon93

    Romanian Naval Forces

    I've made a tree some time ago. It's not 100% complete but, considering it will take forever to be implemented, is good enough as it is(there are some holes here and there but primarily on CVs which i decided to keep aside for now)
  4. Deamon93

    Tone down the AA buff

    I've done the planes but since i don't have the previous data is impossible to make a comparison. Then again now the sheet is future proof
  5. Deamon93

    Romanian Naval Forces

    Well the Italian may have Aquila in her first configuration(with 3x152/40), different enough to make the two coexist i guess.
  6. Deamon93

    Tone down the AA buff

    I assume the interaction between AA and planes got changed(most likely planes aren't able to tank as much damage as before). I haven't checked their stats, i will from the next patch on though.
  7. Deamon93

    Romanian Naval Forces

    As said above only the DDs are worth implemented and only one(Regele Ferdinand) can be used exclusively by the Romanians. Marasti can be used also by the Italians(i considered her as a potential low tier premium DD) and by the Spanish.
  8. Deamon93

    What we know about Ships: Updated 05/04/2017

    Admiral class, tier VII
  9. Deamon93

    Romanian Naval Forces

    Romania would just enlarge the number of Italian designs, since the only two DD classes they had were built and, in case of one(Marasti), even use by Italy. They may show up but i think we should wait and see what happens with other similar cases(namely Polish ships which in most cases are either British or French).
  10. Deamon93

    New AAA

    Perhaps, i haven't checked them.
  11. Deamon93

    New AAA

    I checked every dps value of every ship, all of them remained the same.
  12. Deamon93

    New AAA

    Herp derp, forgot to make it public: https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=984D2BAB7643B021%21205
  13. Deamon93

    What we know about Ships: Updated 05/04/2017

    Ah yeah sorry, mixed the two xD. In the blog post about them wasn't said anything about the rebuilt Furutaka so, perhaps, she wouldn't get it. Then again it's just an assumption.
  14. Deamon93

    What we know about Ships: Updated 05/04/2017

    It was said Furutaka will have her 6x1 7.9" guns and then i think she'll get the 3x2 7.9" guns so in terms of firepower it will be different. Although it's true: Furutaka and Aoba are fairly similar after the reconstruction of the former.
  15. Deamon93

    New AAA

    They just changed the AA ratings, the AA values remained the same(i've done all the maths, as you can see here)
  16. Deamon93

    Tier IX Carrier and Battleship

    Essex had more planes and better AA while Malta had more protection(speed is pretty much even). Overall the two should be balanced, surely better than balancing Midway and Malta.
  17. Deamon93

    Tier IX Carrier and Battleship

    Malta is more of a counterpart of Essex rather than Midway. Regarding Shinano most of her planes were supposed to be stored in parts and mounted when required. She wasn't supposed to be a frontline CV but a maintenance one
  18. Deamon93

    Weird behaviors in AA DPS values

    After the 0.3.0.3 people may say there was a buff in AA: they are wrong. Granted the AA ratings changed but the dps values are exactly the same. I updated the file adding the changes.
  19. Deamon93

    Weird behaviors in AA DPS values

    After noticing that strange behavior in New Orleans i checked the whole US line to see if there were other inconsistencies in the DPS values. Here are all the values(at the moment US only, JP will come eventually). My question is: how these DPS values are set? Because i can't understand if those variations are because of balance or because of bugs.
  20. Deamon93

    Tier IX Carrier and Battleship

    I'm pretty sure nobody said that in NA, in RU i don't know since i don't have access there. Regarding Bismarck it's unclear if she'll be premium or not since she got removed from that topic.
  21. Deamon93

    Tier IX Carrier and Battleship

    The name is after the class, not the single ship(excluding some weird cases such as Tatsuta/Tenryu) Nobody from WG has ever said that.
  22. Deamon93

    Tier IX Carrier and Battleship

    If Essex stays at tier X it's unlikely we'll see Midway due to the fact she's pretty much an enlarged Essex with more/better goodies on(5"/54 instead of the 5"/38, more planes and so on). It makes sense not to have her around since there aren't that many counterparts for Essex already.
  23. Deamon93

    Tier IX Carrier and Battleship

    Tier IX BB will be A-140J2, a preliminary study of Yamato with an armament layout similar to Nelson(with three triple turrets fore). The tier IX CV will be Essex when Midway gets implemented, at least that was the plan.
×