blindhai

Life isn't always a bowl of cherries. And no, it is not. If you want your Tier 6 Captain on another Tier 8 ship you have to invest something, like you would need to, when you retrain every other captain to any other ship. They just accommodate you so that you can reskill.

uhm no, 190k is exactly enough to retrain a 19 point captain. Those Camos are from the Space and Halloween Event, so yes it does include visuals. I guess that you will get the red tracers also when you use this commander. IIRC those camos had no special tracers, so the red ones should be visible.

I never had the idea to have two highly trained captains for only one ship, but it is an interesting idea. The grinding part for both captains is, however, very frightening. If you have two, perhaps the 190k Commander XP maybe enough for both you captains to retrain? What i personally dont understand that there will only an 8 points commander for the "new" Cleveland at Tier 8. Shouldnt it have at least 10 points to get the basic skills? I mean you cant even get Concealment with this, when you want IFHE...which you probably want.

I would say, that grinding alone wont do the trick here. I have friends who have 600+ games (last season around 900) who are still not rank one. To get to rank one you primarily should make sure that you can get first in XP, winning is not always up to you.

Well, ok, but it is already in the patchnotes that it will be changed. So just wait and see.

Do you mean really CoOp or PvE Mode in general (like Scenario too)? I played some CoOp too since the last patch and i have seen no TD like whatsoever. Well, but it is already changed, so just wait. :)

Sure. I think you got to watch Knight Rider there.

Exactly my words...not sure why you even want to remove TD because you excessively play CoOp and that is just going forward, destroying everything. But you can just make a suggestion here: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/71026-suggestions-thread/ I am curious if you want to remove the collision model for your own team next, so you can just go through them...but that is just not for me. I'll pass. It is not asking too much to behave and i dont want to play "Hello Kitty Warships". I am not, it is just funny to see how many players cried in this thread because they got punished because they played unperceptive or are just aholes. ...and they still thought they have done nothing wrong, it is always the other one who did a mistake. H i l a r i o u s I think that there will be others to come even though it was "fixed"... Yes, of course. I also expressed mine. I even share the opinion that the instant deletion for something like only 3 shells from 1 turret (in a BB) is a bit too much. *pointing at the Suggestion Thread again* (regarding "no td") I think it will just work like before the patch but with a bigger reflection than before. We will see though. Lets just hope the aholes dont try to be funny now...and i think you will get more than 2 games for TK (regardless from the damage itself). I think it is like 8 (?) now. But: Only a little warning, nothing more. Well, you dont like colour, but i am sure you will survive. But wait: Didnt you say you dont want any reflection/mirror damage in the first place?

I would never, still wondering if your school experience was different than mine though. It is a part, but not punishable by law...but that is not purposeful here. You still think no team damage at all would be a good idea? I willl not go there. Maybe when WG actually decides this would be a god idea. I dont see any need for action there. If they would implement that then this would be probably bad for the game because players get even more reckless. I imagine that players would start to blame each other when they block torps from their teammates. Following your logic then i would use many of my complements and almost none of my reports, which is not how it was intended to work... Why would you even fire at your allies, when you do Zero damage to them? Well, i would say that the priority should be protecting the normal player. If there is collateral damage like players who had "good intentions" taking a shot or torp away, then this is fine. It is all about the decisions here, do or dont...but live with it. But, as i said, it seems that all the whining changed something. I can live with that, troll players will now be able to torp allies again and just say sorry. But at least the whining will stop, because after that change there is no reason why anyone would have something to complain about.

You were in school? Or are you not that old? I remember that the entire class got fives and sixes except two. Maybe they changed that, because there shouldnt "bad students"...didnt realize it was changed that much. Seems you are alone with your opinion there, which is fine, just sayin. :) Come back if you actually have a case there. :) I would say that it is possible to not getting that close to each other or play with more foresight. For me the intention is given when he is playing reckless or just lazy. When it is no automated and you (the player) take action and punish the other one, not only he will flame you like hell...no...maybe the team will do that as well, because it was in your hand to do nothing/to not punish/to not weaken the team. They wont get the point that the offender is the other guy and they wont care, because you had a choice. You know bullying is a big thin in the internet? So the automatic system will be much better there. So they can blame WG, but not really you, because you couldnt do anything. Right now it can not, the reports will only affect his karma now. If i read this correctly, then you will only get TD or even TK when you are already pink. Not sure when, but it was in the development blog. So i think the system will be fine even for all the whiners here. Finally they can just shoot someone (again) when he doesnt react to their "commands"...so...yay... Not sure if you are really talking about a higher cause here...but i doubt that you can show me a real case here...when you can...come back and we actually will have something to discuss here.

It is very different, right now the system just works and you dont need to be "active" to punish an offender. You are not to blame when the other one get punished, even though there are some in this thread (and others) who blame others or the system. There was not one case til this point where the offender could show a case where he was really innocent, so to speak. Most are just whining that they get punished quicker and cant do their unsporting behaviour like they did before. Well, it just easier to report someone who has 0 XP, because he was simply afk and on the other hand a player who has, lets say, 1800 XP in the winning team did "only" a good job. But nothing that amazing. There are some players like me who give a +karma, when someone lay a smoke or try to play as a team or when the game is close they take responsibilty as, lets say, a dd and play selflessly and just spot without thinking of themselves first. The system itself is fine, what is off balance (well you claim this), then it is human behaviour...most of the time you get complains and only a few compliments...that is life. you really want to give a very very very rare example as counter argument? I think it is more important which case is the main one and occurs more often. I am not talking about eSports, that is an entirely different level. I would call CoOp as such and the scenarios as well, partly random as well, but only lower tier. At hightier i would exspect at least a little effort, nothing special but just dont yolo in and die right at the start. At least try... In the end it is all about time management and timeslots. There are situations where exceptions happen, but when it happs to often then your time management sucks or you are just lazy. Disagree. When your whole ship would be pink and have pink smoke, THAT would be humiliating. In the end it is up to the pinkie to adept to the situation, not the other way around. ehm no, when there is even a risk to harm your team with torps, that means the match is not in the starting phase. And it also means that the opponent must be not in your front. But we can talk all day: Just show me a replay where you think it was a good idea to torp where your team was also in the vicinity and it was entirely not your fault that a mate got hit. Well, i agree, but we need a better punishment system as well. The old system was not fair to the normal player, who got pink very rarely. He knew that the offender who did something like torping the s**t out of you, would only get punished with selfdestruction and going pink for like 7 to 10 games. That was the worst case for the offender! I cant stress this enough. You could basically do what you want and "torp"/destroy the game of others without real consequences. Yes, you could...but most of the time a CoOp game is very short and the bots just go forward and die. No real need for a risky play. But, simply put, if you cant get your s**t right in CoOp you should perhaps better play a solo game or do something else where you dont come close to others. It seems that you are a liability to others then.

Well, then you would get flamed by this player because it is your "fault" that you penalized him and you get flamed...i think it is better when it is the system's "fault". Well, that was the case with the old autoamatic system, which was bad. In the case of laying a smoke: There are situations where you just dont need the smoke even though the intention was good. Well, i can see who played good or bad at the end. I can see bad player who just make bad tactical decisions. And your logic is flawed: The relation bad players to good players looks more like a pyramid, the good players are just more rare, simply put. So it is more likely to get a bad player, he has a chance to make a good match though. When you have a team (small community) and someone cant behave properly, then he need consequences so he recognizes that he made a mistake and improve the next time. Do you have kids? They do it intuitively. And the player who does it right thing has the satisfaction, that the system works and protect him which leads to a better player experience. ehm, this was the case before too. Getting pink and get a color which give you a warning is something entirely different to naming & shaming. You can get the normal color back, when you behave, but you wont get your name out of the forum so easily...not by your own. The pink color is just a warning to others...a signal...but you can redeem yourself with just behaving normal...like you want to be treated. Well, i think it is more important that everyone knows that there a consequences, when you behave like crap. I know that you get instant deleted when you fire with only one turret on another ship from close distance and even you dont do that much damage, you get a slap in your face. That is, maybe, a little drastic but on the other hand i cant think of a situation where you cant hit your initial target from that close distance. In your case those torps were just not well planed and you cant expect from your team that they have a 360 degree awareness all the time. It is likely that they didnt think that torps were coming from that direction and got right into it. Well, you wrote something, but not everybody reads english. And even when they behaved like aholes and just wanted to make you pink...well then they behaved not better than their teammate, who tried to force them to not steer in a specific direction. When you think of it: When you cant get punished for a case like that, then some aholes can just block the way for their teammates when there is easy damage to farm...that is something i dont want to see and it would be unfair.

This suggestion has been there (i think), but i cant stress this enough: Make one(!) Premium currency for all three "World of"-Games. Gold would be the first choice, because it makes sense even in WoWs. You know: Ships -- Pirates -- Treasure -- Gold...

Perhaps you have a replay? One thing: Perhaps it would be good, when the details like "torping with 5,5 km range is team damage, which is getting punished" should be in the patchnotes or somewhere. Cant tell, that i have read it anywhere but here. Just somewhere where everybody can see it.

ehm yeah sure When were you Rank 2? Dont lie!

Just make a suggestion in the Thread or write a ticket. Feedback is good, but i think they wont change it. TD has in WoT far more impact and it is not impossible there So what would you write in those "if"-conditions? How to distinguish between intentional and td by mistake? Right now you have something like "if" the target is near you and you shoot it, then you will punished instantly, because it is not possible to hit from that near without the intend. So which other conditions would you choose? Torp warning is the same for friend and foe, just saying. :) Well, that is the nature of the game. Bad players who do stupid thing or just be afk are far more easy to get than really good players who carry the team or, for example, lay a smoke for a friendly cruiser/dd who can do nice free damage then. The problem with the smoke is, that you dont get anything for your good teamplay there, but maybe these feature will come in the future. You could give the one who laid the smoke some XP depending of how much damage was done from the ships in the smoke, for example. Yes, that is true, but some players are just so stupid. :) We need mechanics which can be used to relaease pressure, right now there is the chat and the report system. You are right, didnt think that you can get 721 XP with 2 victories. Were you afk? Looks weird. Looks like the system works perfectly. You did td and that is the logical consequence. I am sure you are sorry. FYI, when you shoot just one salvo from one turret to a firendly from close range you will get yourself deleted...instantly. That was the system before and no one cared, because you could almost do anything without real consequences. So, we already had that. :)

Wha do you mean with "Locked out"? The Screenshot looks more like that you got into the game and went to C, then got disconnected and couldnt get back in. And it seems it was the first game for you.

ok, for newer players some reserve slots are nice, but do those really have the US cruiser line to tier 6, 7, 8, 9? Well, those will be happy now. I personally dont even know i player who ever bought a slot for a captain.

You are a lucky guy. :) I have seen many tks which i would classify as intentional, mostly torping from second row, which is just... The mirror damage does not happen every time. But in a situation where your ally is near you and you shoot, it is enough to hit him with only 1 turret (3 shells). Your suggestion is good, but i would only second that, when i would not need to report the ahole, but to decide right in this game if i want to punish him. When he doesnt even say sorry, then i wouldnt think twice. Risky salvos are a part of the game but you decide if you want to take the risk. When you dont want to take the risk, dont shoot. It is really that simple. I wouldnt say that tk or team dmg are a good play. :) Why it is in there, is more a question for the developers, for the players it is the scenario which is given. I miss a "torpedo warning" too, but you need to combine it with pinging the map, like when you want a smokescreen. Without that information, another ship can still drive in your torps. But it is also not the case, that you just use that warning message and after that it is their fault. Not that simple. Right now you write "torps inc" and ping the map, it works too. But most of the players dont say anything and i am not sure if they really would use the com-system. I would say 90% which is just a random number anyway, but i agree, that most players dont try to hit their tm. And pls keep in mind that the first warning is the pink status, which is not that hard, because it only last a few matches. When you dont screw up often, you wont even notice that and you probably never get orange anyway.

You will be cmpensated when it is like when the russian dd split occured. https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/update-notes-062/#newru-dd

I dont think so, but we will see. :)

Getting pink is not that hard of a punishment. When you usually dont hit your mates, you wont have a problem after 2 little games.

Relax everybody, there will be an announcement soon before 0.75. Why do you even need informations so soon before? When you want to buy or research those ships, then do it now.

This is the same behaviour like before the patch, where the planes of Allies (or your own) were marked as pink, which is correct, because it is still team damage. Perhaps a replay would help here, just to be sure that there was no ally plane nearby. And to be sure that this is not only the message about teamdamage, like bumping into a friendly ship, a replay would be helpful too. In your screenshot you can not actually see that you status were changed into pink too. It looks more like the result in the after battle-screen, which is taken into account, but has no real impact when you dont misbehave in the upcoming battles. Some logic would help here, because when he wrote, that it is 75% of active time it is just logical that it means the time you are alive. Or are you active when you are dead/destroyed? I mean...come on. When you didnt get pink, you were either detroyed or the game was over while you were at least 75% active. The description itself is clear enough, the only thing that was unsure if you get pink, because you could not know if your active time was enough...because you didnt know how long the match lasted, because you werent in there anymore. One thing i would kinda agree with you, is that some informations were not communicated well. I for one didnt know that you need an active time of 75%, perhaps it was written in the patchnotes, but i cant recall. I try to be informed, but you cant get everything and i didnt plan to be inactive or leave early, because i usually plan the time when i play and dont play when i am not sure that the timeslot is big enough.

THIS! :) Only thing i wonder is: Does "active" mean that you can drive around with autopilot? I dont want to give someone bad ideas, but i wonder. :)