Beastofwar

I do not like that either, being locked out because you passed qualification. People may say what they want, even Bronze ranked is more tactial - and thus more enjoyable - then randoms. It is frustrating to have to be reduced to playing randoms again. The suiciding DD, the camping BB......

In ranked in a Yoshino i decided to get cap B while the teams concentrated on A and B. Capped it, defended it and it worked because of island cover enabeling to sink even 1 Cruiser assailant and over the mach netting 3 million potential damage on me. But... It was not long or my team abandoned A, and was positioned swarming near the map edge. All of them ! Still nothing special, but i was spotting for them while the enemy team decided to push the cap they did not have so they all came at me. The match ended in a loss but i was expecting to save my star for my "heroic" last stand in the face of overwhelming enemies and cowardly team mates... BUT NO WAY !!!! I was only in the middle of the scoreboard !!!! This useless team did nothing then lob shells at distant targets abandoning all caps in the process. And they still score better then someone fighting/defending for a cap and taking 3 million potential damage in a Cruiser !!! Making the only kill !!! Holding the only cap for 3/4 of a match !!! What is wrong with this picture ??? Why should this losing bunch be allowed to save a star at a well deserved loss ??? If anything i would say score should be less depended on useless damage that does not even kill enemy ships......i was the only one that did that. Ofcourse normally in a Yoshino i can do my own share of high useless damage without nescessarily sinking ships and a a distance of well over 20 km.....i posted a 120+ k result yesterday.....but this does not win matches !!! Why does this score so high and actual important actions ( taking, holding and fighting in or near caps ) so few ???

It seems to me when the low tier team isn't stupid enough to camp the high tier team is zerged every single time ? The more so since there don't seem to be any rules what you can bring and i saw 2 completly failing CV and a DD on the high tier ? Isn't it obvious CV really do chipping damage-over-time, lack the raw stopping power of alpha damage ( need to kill at least 1 full HP ship ever few seconds, and they absolutely can't ) and therefore cannot stop a wave of incoming low tier ships and will fail every time ? Never played Operation Newport on a CV ? COOP ? Same goes for picking a DD really....completely unsuitable to stop waves of ships now due to torpedo reload CD. Or do you intend to use tiny popguns to stop a wave of enemy ships ?? Especially not human controlled waves of ships... Unless the enemy is stupid enough to camp, as they do in randoms ofcourse.....i guess WG counts on the low tier team camping to even the uneven chances. Would they be right ? Or is this a aniversary lesson not to complain about being uptiered that much. Want to win every single time as low tier ? MASS CHARGE = ZERG the enemy ! Want to lose ? Mass camp so the superior enemy gets time to take you down one by one.

Upon entering a match a team member typed "WATCH OUT CV THEY ARE GOING TO SNIPE YOU !" Ok. i thought....good luck with that assuming it would be a CV attacking me......but i had not checked the enemy roster at all. That team mate did.....and saw a divsion of 2 tier 9 Mushashi's and a tier 8 CV in a division And immidiatly knew what they were up to. But i was oblivious to that still.... That ofcourse changed when that CV did not attack but simply lit me up. And the heavy Musahsi shells already crashed on my CV. I don't think i could have done a lot even if i knew what they were up to from second 1 after start. So i scrambled planes and intercepted him with fighters. Worked, but he was back in a jiffy ofcourse. The 2 Mushashi's had all but sunk me before i found refuge behind an island. But i was low HP enough the CV could finish me off. Now.....i have seen this pre planned "legal" match rigging before, then with a T8 CV and 2 AA configured T9 Frieslands now with a T8 CV and 2 T9 Mushashi's. And i don't know what to think of it. Is this ability to 100 % win pre-planned fair with such set up divisons in randoms ? Or is it abusive ? Is the ability to bring tier 9 ships to help whack a certain to be there T8 CV fair ? Or abusive ? And before you celebrate the methods of the "just/rightful" killing of a hated CV before it can even play.......it is about a whole team/side in a match that gets defeated by this practise as well. So they are not only snuffing a CV...they are setting YOU up to fail as well when you are in the team that does not have this pre planned 100 % win division. It is nothing less then match rigging, but in a way that is possible withing game function. I have learned to watch the roster before the battle now..... but i doubt with slow CV acceleration and limited enemy intercept abilities when he stays outside the CV's AA range there is not much i can do different. My opinion divisions are very unfair amidst rosters of solo players. If players must play coordinated together let them do that in clan battles. Or in dedicated matches filled with divisioned players. I am immune for rediculous remarks of "bad play" as i did not play at all, only ran for cover and intercept as many enemy plane as i could......to no avail.

You should resign...if not by the things you write yourself, then failing to moderate forum rules. This forums is drenched in hate and personal attacks and you do nothing. 1. Etiquette: Language The official language of this forum is English. Using other languages is allowed in special forum sections only. Do not swear Be relevant The World of Warships Forums are for discussion of topics directly related to World of Warships Topics irrelevant to World of Warships or Wargaming.net are subject to deletion Be constructive When posting, please make sure you do so with good intentions. Refrain from posting when you don't have anything positive or constructive to say on the topic. Your post should contribute to the discussion or the solution of the issue being discussed. If the only purpose of your post is to be negative, it is not worth posting. Be respectful Show others the respect and good behavior you would expect to receive from them. Remember our forums are open for discussion to anyone playing our games. Do not discuss moderation and sanctions Read our Forum Rules to understand why your post was moderated Do not include Wargaming staff names in your thread’s title For any important or urgent matter, you should contact our Customer Support directly Do not create topics/posts to share private conversations Exchanges with our Customer Support Services and through private messages should remain private Do not try to impersonate members of the Administration or Moderation Team Trying to impersonate a member of the staff will result in harsh sanctions. Don’t do it! Keep in mind that red text is reserved for staff members only! Don't post in all CAPS, use a misleading title, and/or excessive punctuation, etc. Do not "bump" posts Do not post about locked or deleted threads 2. No naming and Shaming In-game rule violations should be reported using the in-game function directly. Avoid: Accusing others of being toxic in-game Accusing others of malicious activity Accusing others of cheating or using illegal services Accusing others of trolling on the forums Claiming to have "reported" someone 3. Don’t resort to personal attacks, abuse or harassment: Avoid: Insults Racial or Ethnic slurs Promotion of national hatred Real-Life Threats Spamming or Trolling Distribution of Real-Life Personal Information Links to websites containing any of the above mentioned cases. 4. Don’t spam! Avoid: Repeatedly posting the same content Posting the same content in multiple threads Posting irrelevant content Referral links, advertisements, etc. Advertising for product sales of any kind Advertising for services offered by individuals or companies Excessive capitalization, use of fonts, colours or images Begging Bumping posts (unless it is expressly allowed in the sub-section) Abusing the "Reported Post" feature by sending false alarms or nonsensical messages Multi-posting (creating several posts in a row within a short span of time) 5. Don’t discuss illegal/forbidden activities Discussion of any illegal activity will result in the removal of the post and harsh punishments from the moderation team. Posts about illegal activity will also be escalated to the proper authorities. Avoid: Links to illegal software/content download Links to hacks/illegal mods Links to phishing sites Advertising or asking for Account Trading activities Posting cheats, hacks, Trojan horses or Malicious Programs Advertising or asking for Account Sharing activities Advertising or asking for In-Game Currency selling or exchanging activities Advertising or asking for Promotional Codes selling or exchanging activities Advertising or asking for Levelling services Links to websites containing any of the above mentioned cases 6. No mature content Avoid: Pornographic materials of any kind Imagery that show real life depictions of gore, death, horrifically violent acts, etc. Art that shows nudity (full or partial), or sexually explicit acts or depictions of those acts Links to sites showing any of the above 7. No inappropriate/sensitive topics Avoid discussions about: Religion Sex Politics Social issues Also avoid inappropriate names, avatars or signatures including controversial religious, political or historical figures. 8. Don’t try to cheat the punishment system If you have been banned, the moderation team can automatically ban all your alternate accounts on the forums.

Not carriers.....spotting.

Excavatus needs to check that "armoured deck" of his......it is merely 25 mm plating Mushashi shells overmatch with easy at any angle. That is why there is no escape while you are being lit up. That is why they chose Musashi's in the 1st place...it was not only their range but also 32+ mm overmatching ability you can bring into tier 8 matches with 100 % certainty....instead of facing tier X.....

I think some lost sense of reality that it is a game it is about.....you know playing for passtime end enjoyment....not building up frustration and hate ? They may have wiped that in game outburst of a certain "revered" forum member yesterday, but i will not forget what that made painfully clear any time soon......that person did lose all reality he is merely playing a game there and was adressing human beings. And it seems he is not alone...

I am only amazed by the hostility.....

There is only a small step in evolution between this ( which seems to be amateur level if i may believe the reactions ) to synch dropping in modes not intended for it.....synch drop registeres as solo WR.....

I think a DFAA equiped Smolenks that has BFT/AFT skill for it's main guns will get a smile on his face when he sees aircraft approaching.....ships with such gun layout are AA defence role ships. For a long time i never considered Smolensk to be an air threat......simply because the AA coming from them was rather mild and far less dangerous then what is coming from the likes of Halland. Lately i get shred by them in CV, and have been shredding myself in Smolensk too. If there was nothing changed about the ship by WG, then it is simply players switching from Hydro to DFAA, mabe switching the 6th slot module as well. It is what i did.... Have you noticed the relative abcense of CV influence in current ranked, or at least the usually mass complaints about them completely died in the ranked complaints topic ? It must be caused by less effectiveness somehow....

Yes that seems to be the way it has to be.......i will pass on this salt, pooring it down on all below me in abundance....but in game.

I told them that but CV hate clogs their minds..... A cruiser being caught in an early blap is not pre planned. A DD being snuffed in a kill zone is not pre planned. A CV being blapped after match start by 3 coordinating players IS pre planned and was destroyed before the match begun.... Well...if you need that to get your WR higher, we can see the true vaulue of that.....but what worries me is the amount of forummers that thing this pre-planned WR influencing to your benefit is normal.....what does that say about them and their WR ? It has nothing to do with player skill anymore.....but by how well you can bend the game to your benefit.

California does have higher secondary damage output......but in randoms that is useless because of the ranges that is fought with. Even in Operations it is useless because of it's slow speed, all enemies are dead before California turtles in range..... I have no doubt it is too slow for COOP as well. So it is a universal useless ship.....unless someone can enlighten us what it was meant to do with those features/ship performance tuning by the devs. Florida may disappoint some.....but it does not have the same flaws.

Slooooooow acceleration ? Enormous turn radius ? WG even nerfed that according to LWM so they properly act like massive ships now......not that anyone else noticed probabaly...blaming autopilot for it..... I think this topic is filled with funny reactions though....i will take all this positive energy back onto my CV's and engage enemies with these warm and welcoming reactions in mind....

What a bunch of fine sportmans you are....fair play hah. But ok....in war one is a fool to play fair. So why blame me for using CV then eh ?

Don't you think i have been in exploding Cruisers exposed by CV when just traveling to a position right after start ? The difference is no one was planning on that to artificially boost their WR....... Your example is an enemy making a mistake. The other is messing with match outcomes before the match has started.......somehow the word "CV" seems to blur that for some here.....

I see no one is smart enough/or too blinded by CV hate to see when their sides CV gets sniped they lose too........it is abusive to the whole enemy side of a match...not only the CV....all those enemies lose afterall.

Does a Mushashi overmatch a Pacival ? Yes ? Only 25 mm plating, even the deck..... There were 2 Mushashis firing the second of light up.....an i am sure the Yoshino went with it with HE out of opportunity altough not of that division. Can't blame him though, i would shoot too. No angle is or was safe. My opinion is and was divisions must be removed from solo player matches. As a result it would be curious if WR's were to drop because it was being abused for that , but that is only a side issue.

Can't dodge without speed.....i did say that too didnt i ? Deleting just after match start gives no opportunity to get out of harms way. The weren't using Mushashi's by coincidence...... I won't lament over this as it was a learning experience.......just dislike the unsportsman like players that rig matches like this.....and probably flaunt high WR, berating ""lessers" What fakes they are....

Ah, deleting a specific -1 tier ship right after start with use of 3 player coordination using 2 x +1 tier ships is good play. Has nothing to do with fiddling with win chance ( and with that artificially influence your WR ) before you even start the match and all.......

It is not as you can see that team fought hard without their CV but lost afterall. But is is an extreme disadvantage leading to much more wins for the pre planned division snipers.....thus higher WR also, and not in a skilled or fair way. Players doing this will ( later ) probably synch drop in other modes too raising their solo WR to camouflage such practises.

Bring it....permanent please......i cannot stand corruption and selective applying of forum rules.

By WR that may not be discussed how he got it or a ban is slapped on ? You know how synch dropping works....posted a screenshot of that yourself. That results in nice SOLO player WR too......while a whole team can be filled with friends/clan members with a 100 % sure win. As long as such things exist and MM tries to balance you around 50 % WR , 60 % could be real but 80 % WR does look funny don't you think ? Or restarting an account without historic learning curve stats....and so on and so on. Advise based on WR is no advice at all. Certainly not when toxic enough to belittle others and attack them on their stats.....which IS against forum rules. But seems to have 0 consequence time and again.

You are protected by the absurd rule MOD functioning may not be discussed.....else there would be lots of things to discuss. Like friend politics ( someone accusing others in almost every post of "blatant lies" or just "lies"" never facing consequenses ) for starters. You cannot deny it....that person is doing it in other forums as well. And slapping on bans for no better reason then slighting the ego of those friends....which cannot be found in any forum rule. That what i say has no value is an opinion, and reactions that have no relevance to the topic ( derailing ) never got some very toxic forummers banned....