Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Panocek

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    13,176

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    13617

Everything posted by Panocek

  1. Panocek
    You mean Petro having complete [edited]for HE and fire chance?
  2. Panocek

    The Coal Container question.

    Panocek replied to Migantium_Mashum's topic in General Discussion

    Only thing "coal" container warrants is getting at least one coal supply. Same with other container options IIRC
  3. Panocek
    Which sadly seems to continue bri'ish accent spree
  4. Panocek
    Well, I've meant tails don't come from usual place you'd expect them to, but from the side
  5. Panocek

    Which T9 ship to use the perma bonus on?

    Panocek replied to deathsadow's topic in General Discussion

    Just put it on a ship you enjoy playing (or regrinding for RB) the most.
  6. Panocek
    I can't help but notice her tails seem off.
  7. Panocek
    There are no bugs, there are features
  8. Panocek
    Except her kit already seems extremely underwhelming and I don't see burst fire saving her much, unless you intend to play her as hit and run ship.
  9. Panocek
    I have no idea either, thus you might roll with what WG officially delivers: -how this ship pew pew? -yes
  10. Panocek
    Vertical dispersion differ a bit, which is I guess WG balancing factor alongside sigma? courtesy of https://shiptool.st/selected?s=FB109FB110FB510FB111&c=top&p=mb&rm=18
  11. Panocek

    Methods of Distribution of New Ships - (DB 346)

    Panocek replied to Makoniel's topic in Development Blog

    Or even Saint Spreadshiet can't justify Vallejo as tier 10 ship, while she might be tad too good to go for usual doubloons as T8... unless, she will be Steel+Doubloons ship
  12. Panocek

    Yueyang Vs Gearing

    Panocek replied to MadBadDave's topic in General Discussion

    French communists will have to suffice
  13. Panocek

    Yueyang Vs Gearing

    Panocek replied to MadBadDave's topic in General Discussion

    fixed. Because sure as hell Russian destroyers aren't anything to be amazed with. Because Fletcher tier lower exists. Also all T10 destroyers are encroaching, or exceed displacement of 3000t which by definition means they are going to be bigger and clumsier. Only Daring have actually good handling and that comes exclusively from magic no-drag hull on their destroyers and CLs. Just look at Atlanta or San Diego and answer yourself whether WG will give actually meaningful anti air just because ship IRL had its moments. Hint: they won't.
  14. Panocek

    French Large Cruiser Review

    Panocek replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements

    This. Free Exp won't spend itself, you know And when Free Exp ships were replaced by RB, which is a scam most of the time, Free Exping ships it is.
  15. Panocek
    I guess I've underestimated power of AL autoplay when poking roguelike mode in Arknights in meantime Close enough? Genshin dropped another update, this time summer event featuring rerun, or rather continuation of Golden Apple Archipelago. And sadly they have overdone with exploration and puzzles, as most of these requires constant back-and-forth, which is fun for first hour, but gets outright annoying quickly. On the upside, lore with character domains is very juicy, especially Kazuha. That and they've tried for first time (?) slight alterations to gameplay, that being side scrolling, albeit just for showcasing story in a flashback style and bullet hell, which can be cheesed with old but gold daddy Zhongli Another edit, as some new stuff worthy of shitposting appeared Gallery of newest pasta flavored event, freshly yoinked off the stream Took only what, 14 months?
  16. Panocek
    To get financial quotas when they finally leave development hell
  17. Panocek

    Steam wows runs like dog water?

    Panocek replied to ________________Morrison's topic in General Discussion

    That should be the case yes. I very much doubt WG would willingly split their already not big playerbase based on just game launchers. Even accidentally playing on RU/US servers with higher than average pings shouldn't have impact on game performance. I guess run game/file repair for starters?
  18. Panocek

    Torpedo belt is awesome. Just like this game

    Panocek replied to anonym_ntfKigmJ0k9e's topic in General Discussion

    Russian cruiser with 5 layers of 40mm plating when
  19. Panocek

    Torpedo belt is awesome. Just like this game

    Panocek replied to anonym_ntfKigmJ0k9e's topic in General Discussion

    That is a possibility, after all thats how layered armor works on main French cruisers, (in)famous for soaking salvos. Sadly in Cherbourg case, torpedo belt plating is directly adjacent to main belt of 170mm, making such possibility highly unlikely My guess, shot was taken at between 45-60 angle - 380mm AP won dice roll and penetrated 27mm torpedo belt, but failed dice roll against main armor and ricochet.
  20. Panocek

    Torpedo belt is awesome. Just like this game

    Panocek replied to anonym_ntfKigmJ0k9e's topic in General Discussion

    "Weakness" of Brit AP in tech tree ships comes from shorter fuse on AP. Sure, it can pose problems scoring citadels on ships with layered armor, but against cruisers with exposed citadel (exposed as in without intricate armor layout, just citadel hitbox spanning entire beam), they can be devastating even at short range, where high powered BB guns can overpen citadels.
  21. Panocek

    Lolz.....the future of wows......

    Panocek replied to Andrewbassg's topic in General Discussion

    And yet certain AP spamming class of ships remains to be the most popular in game, like it always was and probably will be thanks to having the best ASW option.
  22. Panocek

    Torpedo belt is awesome. Just like this game

    Panocek replied to anonym_ntfKigmJ0k9e's topic in General Discussion

    If you can't deal with that, doors are this way Also point blank doesn't mean perpendicular. Sure, WG could improve hit ribbons, as "torpedo belt hit" ribbon covers two events: shell shattering on armor behind torpedo belt and shell ricocheting from the armor behind torpedo belt.
  23. Panocek

    Anyone take a chance on the Iwami?

    Panocek replied to Sir_Sinksalot's topic in General Discussion

    I build captains around tech tree ships, so Yamato captain enjoys rather conventional tank build and fits like a glove to whatever IJN BB premiums I have. And keep in mind he would work on Iwami just as well, just try to not yolo on nearest opportunity. Same with Georgia/Massachusetts - I do have dedicated secondary captain for them, but they also work well with usual BB skipper. Georgia in particular, being amazingly flexible BB. Sure, you can say Concealment is worthless when sub or CV is molesting you. But same goes to secondary build being wasted when you can't make use of it. At the same time, main guns is something usually worth investing on a BB, if nothing else, it usually have the range to harass someone's post code with 1ton+ of ordnance. And if you don't want big guns, why you're on a battleship again?
  24. Panocek

    Anyone take a chance on the Iwami?

    Panocek replied to Sir_Sinksalot's topic in General Discussion

    And then there's issue with hybrids, they are going to be inherently inferior from specialized min-max builds on according ships. I guess closest to a "hybrid" build would be this? Giving some attention to secondaries, while also keeping survivability via reducing DoT damage and main guns in decent shape. Obviously, that build would make sense only on Iwami, as there aren't many IJN battleships you'd consciously build into secondaries.
  25. Panocek

    General CV related discussions.

    Panocek replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion

    Thus short answer is yes Except if players moaning on the forums would fix anything, game wouldn't have carriers or subs in current shape. Thus if you don't like direction where game is heading and devs are hellbent on ignoring your feedback, changing games you spend your time on is sound idea, at least for a time and see how game (d)evolved in 6-12 months.
×