-
Content Сount
13,176 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
13617
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Panocek
-
In ideal world, tier 5 vs tier 5 would happen. Yet we have what we have - tier 5 vs 7, tier 8 vs 10 on daily basis. And my main gripe is USN midtier BB combination of lack of HE protection and glacial slow speed. Other nations have speed advantage and more often than not, some semblance of HE resistant plating.
-
And how exactly often tier 5 doesn't see tier 7? While Atlanta, Helena, Belfast and whatnot aren't shining examples of naval protection, they are more than capable of being cause of daily "buff BB" threads.
-
Lack of speed is not helped by utter lack of HE protection, making them basically free damage to be farmed.
-
Myokos get turret traverse buff too
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Panocek replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Buffing mythical, legendary Missouri is certainly not going to bring extra butthurt /s Though she is plain Iowa with radar tacked to her. -
Received a 30% coupon but don t have what to spend it on...
Panocek replied to 22cm's topic in General Discussion
Same here. Nothing interesting, maybe doubloon package, to convert them at later discounted price, or tech tree available premboat sold on Christmas discounts. Or hightier premium paints issues: I already have Missouri and I already run out of ships I'd be interested in, so no reason to spend FXP and credits. Buying T8 premium with current MM is like commiting sudoku, T7 and below? I already have bunch of them, spare port queens not needed. Premium time? I'm done with grinding new ships, so not much to gain there. -
Might even buff AP and erf HE in the next patch eventually...
Panocek replied to Captain_Bloodless's topic in General Discussion
Well, AP did to you almost twice the damage per shell than HE... so be careful where you tread. -
Adding the option to sell permanent camo for 50% credits
Panocek replied to That_Other_Nid's topic in General Discussion
You can spent pixel coins on another pixel paint. Try doing that other way around -
cv rework CV Rework Beta Test - Feedback thread
Panocek replied to Crysantos's topic in General Discussion
Still, ability to dismiss that red on taskbar would be handy -
cv rework CV Rework Beta Test - Feedback thread
Panocek replied to Crysantos's topic in General Discussion
And you just got banned, just in case -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Panocek replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
That would give ship niche as ultimate rammer. Which must be balanced by 15kts speed. -
Works for me just fine...
-
Just don't overtake friendly DDs on initial cap rush
-
CM is one of the few T8 ships I can think of which can live and thrive in T10 MM. Just slap Engine Boost mod and double rudder and channel your inner Kebab onto your enemies. Possible as CM have both workable base top speed and gets proper FR Engine Boost, giving 20% bonus. So you get cruiser capable of 40kts and hard WSAD haxes.
-
With proliferation of tier 10, with all the premium paints, Legendary modules to grind and whatnot one can't expect to play T8 as top tier.
-
I have no issues aiming "blind" since introduction of map marker. And Spotter perspective screws aiming for me
-
You can tack main battery range upgrade for that. And before you get an idea - spotter on top of that is only good for futility exercises. 17s to 22km IIRC
-
Well, entire derp cannon comes from WoT and refers to short barreled howitzers. Naval guns with barrel length of 40+ calibers, same as "proper" AT guns don't really qualify as derps
-
Tier 10 have 50% fire chance reduction, so from 4.5% you go to 5.5%. You can argue if its worth 3 points, even more so as its all RNG in the end. I had case of landing about 150 HE shells in Henri IV and still getting only 2 fires. On a ship with 24% fire chance
-
The Pumpkin harvest has gone rotten this year.
Panocek replied to Blixies's topic in General Discussion
So far all I've got are Z-23 (meh, as I have anniversary one) and Benson camo. -
From Reddit (interesting side effect from "fix" regarding AP): On the PTS you can sink a Yamato solely by shooting a single secondary turret with Harugumo AP
Panocek replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Destroying ship by shooting the same secondary turret is dumb, just as secondaries/AA mounts soaking damage. Random thought - secondaries/AA do not interact with shell ballistics, so they can't soak up 203/406/whatever shell landing on top of them, but still can be destroyed if caught within HE blast or AP shell passes through them -
[NA] LittleWhiteMouse - testing the penetration changes to torpedo bulges
Panocek replied to Aragathor's topic in General Discussion
its also buff to German battleboats in general, as only tier 4 have actual torpedo bulge above waterline. WG and German Bias? -
[NA] LittleWhiteMouse - testing the penetration changes to torpedo bulges
Panocek replied to Aragathor's topic in General Discussion
Pretty much. FR cruisers might be more vulnerable to high pen HE hitting armor belt, as situations where shell penetrates 100mm external plating but fails to penetrate inner 40mm citadel plating are rather rare. On other hand, Henri IV with 19mm torp bulge covering outer 140mm plating and then 45mm citadel plating... I wonder if WG can into working as intended here -
Why not both? PT, LS, SE, AFT, BFT, DE, SI
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
Panocek replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Guessing misscalculation on WG part at rate players obtain coal. Bonus points for "dat boat was op on CC previews"
