Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Panocek

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    13,176

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    13617

Everything posted by Panocek

  1. Panocek

    Yuudachi announced as tier 7 Premium

    Panocek replied to ApesTogetherStronK's topic in General Discussion

    Said guy with totally not boobs anime avatar
  2. Panocek

    Yuudachi announced as tier 7 Premium

    Panocek replied to ApesTogetherStronK's topic in General Discussion

    Consult your nearest commissar for immediate blamming for associating C&C with ponies
  3. Panocek
    Nah, Camrade Moskva is fine as free sample of Stalingrad
  4. Panocek

    CV's ... a radical proposal to resolve the mess

    Panocek replied to Gojuadorai's topic in General Discussion

    WG doesn't read forums and certainly not EU one so we're safe, I guess
  5. Panocek

    Stalingrad

    Panocek replied to wot_chikor's topic in General Discussion

    With reload mod on both still stays almost double of what Moskva have - 9.1s vs 17.85s Henri IV can blam brits and cruiser superstructures as well. And fire chance is what it is, fire CHANCE. Henri IV with flags and DE packs meaty 26% fire chance yet I had two battles already with no fires set regardless how many HE shells I chucked out. On other hand Hindenburg seems to be fine firestarter despite crappy fire chance, I guess volume of fire can make up for RNGesus middle finger
  6. Panocek

    Stalingrad

    Panocek replied to wot_chikor's topic in General Discussion

    In world where Montana can't overmatch anything but random Minotaur and can't deal full pens to DDs, yes.
  7. Panocek

    Stalingrad

    Panocek replied to wot_chikor's topic in General Discussion

    and 93% longer reload BB angled towards you and stalinium piercing bounced off? Have fun loading HE. And then broadside cruiser pops up, another 20s spent switching ammo. Cruised angled? Feel free to reee
  8. Panocek

    Stalingrad

    Panocek replied to wot_chikor's topic in General Discussion

    Or replace all the ships with uniform "tier 1 ship", "tier 2 ship" etc and players purchase/grind skins for these ships. When everyone plays the same ship, balans achieved camrade
  9. Panocek
    Why pay2poi when you can poi4free?
  10. Panocek
    "Soon" in gaming industry means at some point, eventually, somewhere, somehow. Doesn't mean actual soon.
  11. Panocek

    A novice player (noob) sets up the Hipper

    Panocek replied to Saltface's topic in General Discussion

    For tsundere heavy cruiser purposes I have Takao already. Free captain is free, so why not. Especially with unique voiceover
  12. Panocek

    A novice player (noob) sets up the Hipper

    Panocek replied to Saltface's topic in General Discussion

    Also there is mission chain to get free 10lvl German captain, you need to: -manually opt in here https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/sales-and-deals/january-missions-2019/ -show valiant resistance against 2d girls with squeaky voices though you can hide them in port filter options
  13. Panocek

    A novice player (noob) sets up the Hipper

    Panocek replied to Saltface's topic in General Discussion

    AFAIK free skill respec should come with 0.8.0 with CV rework
  14. Panocek
  15. Panocek

    PSA: Concealment nerf coming up in 0.8.0, hitting mainly cruisers

    Panocek replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion

    CV limit is going away so queues might not be (as) bad.
  16. Panocek
    And to sell Scharn as "unique" boat
  17. Panocek

    PSA: Concealment nerf coming up in 0.8.0, hitting mainly cruisers

    Panocek replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion

    For first few weeks you can be sure there will be CVs in almost every game as people will try them out. Whether WG goal of "increasing popularity" will be achieved, remains to be seen.
  18. Panocek
    I wonder if constant moaning about youngsters could be sign of dementia. Because spreading nonsense is apparently norm these days
  19. Panocek
    Yep, controlling trade routes, naval blockades and simple naval presence is totally not a thing in naval combat
  20. Panocek
    Extend tiers to 14-16 and you can introduce modern MBTs. Wank Thunderp kinda tried to do that, as usual ended with high "tier" overcompression
  21. Panocek
    You don't have to concern yourself with playing ANY battles, as you can appreciate warboats in port, just put some mod to remove that gray overlay and you can fap to your hearts content
  22. Panocek

    PSA: Concealment nerf coming up in 0.8.0, hitting mainly cruisers

    Panocek replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion

    Plenty of people farmed their 750k Free Exp, heck, WG is rising price tag for Alaska simply because how easy Free Exp you can farm nowadays as WG just keeps throwing flags, camos and events at players. You're grossly overhyping Missouri, she is just Iowa that traded plane options for oh so mythical radar. And since Iowa got rudder and health pack boosts, you can argue if this gimmick is worth it. Musashi, you mean floating citadels to farm? And I'd love to see you tanking shots with Kronshtadt And again, I dare you to buy yourself Stalingrad without playing any sort of ranked/cw. Oh and WG just keep throwing those unique captains at me, so "very p2w" only if you can't be arsed to play the game. And if you play the game, why you're concerned with "p2w" issues?
  23. Panocek
    I'm quite sure more players will quit when embraced by "historically accurate" battleships. Purchase cost, repairs and numbers allowed to enter the battle. You could purchase 16 Fletchers for single Iowa. So 248 milion credits to buy one, 1.92mil for post battle service to keep in scale. In battles BB and CV could share "capital ship" slot, which would be limited to two per team.
  24. Panocek

    PSA: Concealment nerf coming up in 0.8.0, hitting mainly cruisers

    Panocek replied to FixCVs_Nautical_Metaphor's topic in General Discussion

    Rustled jimmes only you have here. Murmansk being better than Omaha is still crappy-ish by tier 5 standards. Stalingrad - still obtainable by CW/Rankeds, I dare you to go and buy one with all the steel you can buy Musashi, Missouri, Kron, obtainable for free. And even then you need to know how to 2+2 to make use of them, so not really "p2w"
  25. Panocek
    Guns are only one part of the "ship" equation. Scharn have best in tier armor, so she is classified as battleboat, while extraordinary secondaries and torps help her mitigate guns lacking punch. Alaska/Kron/Moskvagrad are considered cruisers due to way inadequate armor compared to same tier battleships. And while you could press Alaska as tier 5, maybe tier 6 BB, it would look dumb for late ww2 warboat meet and engage ww1 dreadnoughts on daily basis. And even then Alaska would be outclassed in terms of armor.
×