Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Panocek

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    13,176

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    13617

Everything posted by Panocek

  1. Panocek
    Possible, as they (at least EN staff) will party hard on board of Iowa That or Alabama, being siscon so much Portland could take notes
  2. Panocek

    Khabarovsk in 0.8.5.1 - HELP

    Panocek replied to kiowa's topic in General Discussion

    Then there is issue of Tashkent being more forgiving to play - almost 2km more range, lack of BB rudder shift, doesn't eat AP pens and have actually serviceable torpedoes at expense of one turret and 1050hp
  3. Panocek
    Obviously they took a look at them and determined 100% frequency is of "just right" for a free boat
  4. Panocek
    The very purpose of events like this is to pray upon player mistakes, so they would have to spend on the game if they are determined to get the reward.
  5. Panocek

    Italian Cruisers Video Reveal

    Panocek replied to Nufessa's topic in Videos & Streams

    Yep, tier 10 is/should have 15gun salvo. Mogami of tier 10
  6. Panocek
    wait what
  7. Panocek

    Khabarovsk in 0.8.5.1 - HELP

    Panocek replied to kiowa's topic in General Discussion

    Unfortunately recent stats doesn't put her in position for buffs, as handful of basterds playing her just keep her top damage Even Daring, newest DD addition have more players and battles behind her belt (as well 55% WR)...
  8. Panocek
    This is part where you unzip wallet
  9. Panocek

    Khabarovsk in 0.8.5.1 - HELP

    Panocek replied to kiowa's topic in General Discussion

    Don't play Khaba, go back to Tashkent for extra range or Grozovoi for at least some AA and more range anyway And "CV meta" is gone, as carrier playerbase already hit pre rework values, so you have to be quite unlucky to bump into one or stop teaming up with CV.
  10. Panocek

    Do you want submarines in the game?

    Panocek replied to BanzaiPiluso's topic in General Discussion

    inb4 CVs get depth charges AND sonar buoys for balancing reasons
  11. Panocek

    Do you want submarines in the game?

    Panocek replied to BanzaiPiluso's topic in General Discussion

    The moment subs can hit 35kts submerged you can put IJN DDs in recycle bin... in case you haven't done so already.
  12. Panocek

    Do you want submarines in the game?

    Panocek replied to BanzaiPiluso's topic in General Discussion

    That and destroyers already fulfill submarine niche of surprise torpedo attacks without their speed drawback.
  13. Panocek

    CV population according to "spreadsheets"

    Panocek replied to ChatBanForSayingTruth's topic in General Discussion

    Its not broken, its working as intended
  14. Panocek

    CV population according to "spreadsheets"

    Panocek replied to ChatBanForSayingTruth's topic in General Discussion

    And will be 75% if citadel nerf gets live
  15. Panocek
    Then, Atlanta doesn't even need IFHE to melt T7 and below cruisers, same with Henri vs Republique or Conqueror for that matter. Scaling HE damage based on encountered plating thickness akin to WoT would be one solution, that or IFHE skill would reduce HE shell damage AND fire chance by (random guess) 30%
  16. Panocek
    Green cat strikes back
  17. Panocek

    CV population according to "spreadsheets"

    Panocek replied to ChatBanForSayingTruth's topic in General Discussion

    Dunno, borderhumping in my Conkek works just fine
  18. Panocek

    So whats the next step regarding CVs ?

    Panocek replied to kapnobathrac's topic in General Discussion

  19. Panocek

    So whats the next step regarding CVs ?

    Panocek replied to kapnobathrac's topic in General Discussion

    Lex bombs actually care about Yamasushi, Izumo, Soyuz and Kremin, as they have thicker deck than Lex bomb pen. You need TiTs to smack these baBBies
  20. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Panocek replied to __Helmut_Kohl__'s topic in General Discussion

    Torpedo reloads on ships were rarity indeed and mostly IJN DDs and cruisers had them. And amount of shells per gun for "small" calibers is comparable to that of a Minotaur, if not more - ubiquitous 5"/38 used as secondary guns on US cruisers and BBs had 500 shells per gun, 350-400 for destroyers. Wooster had 400/gun as well. Heavy cruisers had around 150/gun, battleships around 100/gun Lowest ammo count for DDs I can find is on Russian destroyers, with Gnevny class having as little as 100/gun. But then, early guns on these had difficulty lasting longer than that, so every time Project 7 destroyer would return for resupply, it would also have its barrels replaced
  21. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Panocek replied to __Helmut_Kohl__'s topic in General Discussion

    http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_6-50_mkN5.php 400 rounds per gun That gives 4000 rounds on board, divided by 187 rounds/min (18.7 rate of fire * 10 guns) gives us over 21 minutes of continuous fire to expend that amount of ammo
  22. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Panocek replied to __Helmut_Kohl__'s topic in General Discussion

    The best part is, amount of planes on CV+recovery is already comparable or less than RTS carriers used to have introducing ammo limit for guns would be the most pointless feature ever, as you would be VERY hard pressed to expend it all in 20min timespan and even then you would fail most of the times.
  23. Panocek
    After all, you can't just shove pizza into microwave and set it at 2min to make it ready
  24. Panocek
    In case you haven't noticed, battles don't take place at distances you would aim guns directlyat the target and gravity is a thing even in WG games
  25. Panocek
    Okt Rev is Russian.
×