Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Panocek

Players
  • Content Сount

    13,176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    13617

Everything posted by Panocek

  1. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    You think WG follows logic. That's grave mistake...
  2. Panocek

    Will Aigle receive MBRB ?

    Very unlikely, Ayygle got not so long ago torpedo range buff and she have smoke, unlike rest of the Croissants. Da Grasso was superior across the board to La Gasoline, so she was omitted when MBRB was handed around
  3. Don't remind me... my own "IT" section working with pen and paper instead, I dunno, excel to find differences between "what is now" and "what should be" granted, list of "what should be" was handed from other department in paper form tho
  4. Panocek

    On sunsets, dolphins and giant squid

    Correct me if I'm wrong... but weren't some sort of squid, whale or whathaveyou present in depths during Halloween submarine test drive?
  5. There is no tech you can't replace with good old penal labor force
  6. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Yep, for once port stats are useful Still, first impression it gives its another nerf for carriers, as you can't skip long range aura. So, additional 5hp/tier for SE in next week?
  7. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Yep, instead dps having "standarized" damage tick with rate of fire being variable, WG made rate of fire constant and damage is now variable. AA tracers are unrelated tho
  8. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Something for @CptBarney And Raptor is unplayable with your standard issue, potatoes, mk1, so far every game lost because everyone hug repair ship, while Raptor herself bugger off at full speed Amount of AA tracers looks nice, though looks derpy when Mutsuki puts "wall of AA" you would consider Iowa capable of. That is some stronk autoloading for those two dual purpose 120mm guns on Mutsuki
  9. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Sounds like WG balancing. Foch 155 from World of Tanks for example - 155mm anti tank gun with 3 shot autoloader, capable of killing pretty much anything in one magazine within 10 seconds. One might guess nerfing autoloader reload or damage per shot would solve it, but nah - lets brutalize mobility, accuracy and aiming time, leaving main culprit intact, so when stars align it still can 3shot stuff
  10. Precisely why it won't happen. Either grind your soul away or pay up if you want shiny [insert ship name]. Which seems to be WG recipe as of late.
  11. Panocek

    Mode with Finite Ammo

    Pointless unless you introduce 30min+ battles. Most ships in game are unable to expend all their ammo reserves even when going full dakka for 20min, let alone in actual combat ie when you open fire at something worth firing at. More believable would be barrel overheating, but then this feature would impact cruisers and destroyers only... And battleships already have too much in their favor
  12. inb4 consumable pizza delivery system, healing ship and anyone around for 5% hp
  13. Emerald main belt is in line with other T5 cruisers - 76mm, what's she infamous for is her 25mm citadel roof doubling as deck. Something she was announced to have changed to 40mm to make her stop eating citadels from HE. And considering 60-85 ricochet angles, you would be hard pressed to make SAP punch through Emerald deck in most combat scenarios at tier 5
  14. I think I've saw somewhere SAP penetration within 30-50mm territory? Basically not enough to pierce citadel armor besides some very lowtier lolmobiles. That and "overpen only" against DD is sketchy to say the least. Especially when you account glorious pizza powered shell elevators (20s reload)
  15. So you can say this summer sale is 100% successful?
  16. Panocek

    angling

    Not so much overmatch, as punch through with improved ricochet angles of hers at "angled pretty well", which isn't exactly precise
  17. Panocek

    angling

    Windows Store apps folders are out of access even if you have full admin rights. You need to fiddle with folder ownership to get there
  18. Sub torps blueprints being as common as they are is kinda bummer. That and I guess I'll have to considering clearing up docks again, especially them filler DDs like A, C and M class and what have you. I barely use DDs whatsoever, simply because why use DD when I can throw Brooklyn at it? Akizukis are at least memes in terms of volume of (not really effective) fire when outfitted with their 100mm twin, what French DDs would be, remains to be seen.
  19. inb4 she will be Sandy: Evolution outline seems to have the same jumping pose so... Also not sure wat do with subs in AL, having 8, including one SSR (I-168, which Yuckykaze tier annoying) of them as of now and dunno if its worth putting resources into them
  20. Panocek

    Georgia vs. Massachusetts

    Georgia is more of a flanker than brawler, she is just too fragile to just barge in with secondaries blazing. Jean Bart is solid ship and as relatively normal BB, can get along with base 10pt captain just fine (PT/PM, AR, SI, CE) She is AA powerhouse, so on her own can fend off planes at least for a while.
  21. Panocek

    Should I buy Nelson?

    You know, traits you've mentioned applies to all battleships, not only ones at tier 7
  22. Panocek

    CV Rework Discussion

    Not really, as 30mm plating defeats 27mm pen on those fireworks... Not mentioning WoWs Blitz have actually manually aimed secondaries you can pew pew yourself with. This game had "quality" to start with?
  23. Panocek

    Acquiring Steel

    Precisely as "long term" goals to keep players hooked. Though clan battles seems to be more generous in terms of steel rewards, but then to participate in them you might need specific tier 10 ships, as rentals might not be "flavor of the month" I'm afraid
  24. Panocek

    Khabarovsk in 0.8.5.1 - HELP

    Well, it takes russian to fight russian
×