Panocek

You mean one of reasons why REEEwork happened in first place? And if you actually put effort in maths, you know, the stuff you presumably had to interact with in school, you should realize amount of planes is actually finite within 20min timespan of a battle. And considering full 20min battles are actually rare, CVs can deploy less planes in practice than spreadshiet would suggest

Someone send Langley in hot pursuit after him

Which applies to premium carriers. Now try doing meaningful damage in plebian carriers 150 is reachable, assuming you throw all fighter summons at Minotaur because reasons. Actual strike complement even for T10 goes up to 80 IIRC or so

Dun worry, WG always can add or substract 5hp from Survivability Expert

CV REEEwork being indirect BB buff is frighteningly sound idea, as they came out unscathed, if not straight up better. That and CV providing spotting and focusing them bloody flankers wankers, so baBBies can pew pew unmolsted

WG: We've flattened AA dps for all ships to be in line with Minotaur, Slava and Friesland respectively also WG: We've flattened plane hp for all planes to be in line with Hosho, Langley and Hermes respectively

Nope, you will have to woof your way through the flak

Guessing dps will be assigned arbitrarily instead dps per mount multiplied by amount of mounts.

After getting Alabama and Baltinope I've got an idea of getting myself Birmingham and at later date, Columbia to assemble 2nd Cleveland fleet, but alas, 30odd cubes and no luck. And I don't intend to put more than daily as who knows what will be lurking in construction during anniversary

Sound AA changes, flak being mostly long range aura, though why can't it be tied to it instead 3.5km+? it would make midtier DDs and IJN ships kinda goofy with their short and long range only... wait what Who are you and what have you done to WG

At this point, it doesn't matter for the gameplay quality if one gets "practice" at tier 5 or 10, it can't get any lower... I think

Went where "user feedback" goes

Been suggested like half year ago. Did it happened or even got acknowledged?

So, on ships with dps actually worth a damn MAA will a noobtrap it seems? ANd considering its WG we're talking about, free respec/point refund at this point is... unlikely

IIRC S_O made it very clear "RTS rollback" would be plausible only on first days of the REEEwork and only when it would be "gamebreaking" on technical level. Still, why AP bombs were kept is beyond me, I guess to justify whole DB bomb trajectory they decided to come up with.

Unlikely because carrier are "balans" in terms of average damage, comparable or just tad lower to BBmasterrace.

If CV playerbase is on the same level as it used to be before rework but is spread out on half of the tiers, does it make 100% success? With that logic, removing all the tiers but 10 would make CV REEEwork 600% success?

Technically, you could say there is only one shell in game, which have following parameters -fire chance (0-∞) -fuse sensitivity (0-∞) -fuse time (0-∞) -penetration (0-∞) -ricochet angles (0-∞) -overmatch (yes/no) Based on these, you have two "archetypes" and WG is developing 3rd one. And you can and some more, like long fuse, garbage ricochet, fire chance projectiles with overmatch or whatever sekrit dokuments are calling for

You mean Flooding change in what was it? 0.8.2? which was a damage nerf in 80% of the cases and slowdown, which is in game since beta times, if not longer? CV were intended to be "DoT" damage dealers of a sort... which lasted one week, as WG slashed in half flood chances with 0.8.0.1

You need to stop topping up the charts, all the chat noise is for naught if its not backed up by being on the bottom

https://mustanghx.github.io/ship_ap_calculator/ https://wowsft.com Both unofficial datamines, so both can be as accurate as pissing after 1l of vodka AP pen I don't find to be an issue for Azuma class, their dispersion is. And they have "improved" dispersion already over regular CB, whom follow Graf Spee pattern. Overall, I can say Azuma class is balanced, though Azuma is powercrept by her T10 sister HARD. Thing is, with increasingly overgimmicky or otherwise broken ships WG have been pulling out for some time already, "balanced" doesn't cut it Oh I've forgot

Well, Yoshino/Azuma have "comparable" ballistics and only slightly better AP pen than Moskva despite noticeably bigger caliber and shell weight. Only large cruisers with AP actually worth something against T10 BB main belts are Kron and Stalingrad, rest needs to be closer than you're usually comfortable with.

Alpha times, when Zao was called Senjo ended quite some time ago despite what WG tries to show off with CV REEEwork And not sure where you've got idea of Moskva being "lacking" large cruiser - she's most tanky, as Stalingrad have noticeably smaller 50mm bow section, while 305mm guns don't provide much to the table when it comes to overmatch, while Moskva still can pump out shells every 9s, unlike 16.3s in best case scenario, Yoshino Russians are all about long range shelling, they have range and ballistics for that, while their squishiness makes you reconsider any vodka induced bravery to make use of their glorious one way ticket 4km torps. IJN and French are kiters though of different flavors - IJN rely on stealth, putting out one-two accurate salvos only to disappear into darkness as well putting their serious torpedo payloads to use at edge of detection against closing in foes. Croissants rely on open water shenanigans with WSAD hax and their Engine Boost, with occasional use of Main Battery Reload Booster to blast some citadels on open broadside or set some extra fires "Forgiving" and "cruisers" don't really mix well to start with.

Ring ding ding you've found an answer.

So, EN server is up and new event is quite dank and tower defense style at least first map First pull also brought Baltimore. And though cubes still aplenty, something something research something was munching hard my coins Alabama also get. Which basically concludes this part of the event