Panocek

Now only if WGC would correctly detect which client version to load, that would be great

Two solutions I've found so far: -run game executable directly from World of Warships\bin\3052606\bin64, you might need to copy preferences.xml from main folder to there to avoid setting audio/video/controls again. -REMOVE or MOVE ELSEWHERE 3173843 folder from World of Warships\bin, usual trick of renaming folders doesn't work

Kinkyberg sisters, being white rarity CLs with two having retrofits to them might work.

Theory and practice have tendency to not go together

Time to close the wallet was in early 2019, when WG decided to push oh so flawed glorious CV REEEwork. Switching from WG to Gaijin is like jumping out of frying pan into the fire

Mine client didn't got the memo, WGC also reports 0.9.11 Client repair and even full reinstall achieved nothing

...directly. But putting game on its head, repeatedly, to fluff up with premium ships and to extract money from players who want "newer, better ships"? Sure why not

Create a problem and sell solution for it later.

YoU cAn UsE +7% aP sHeLl DaMaGe SkIll This is Mikasa (and anything T6 and below) buff if I can see one. Which may or may not actually make secondary Operations specs not hilariously ineffective for once.

So far, token changes to initial build. Which confirms Lesta will push whatever they can brew in their basement distillery, "player feedback" or not.

*sad Daring noises*

Preventative Maintenance reduces odds of disabling turret when it gets hit, but it does absolutely nothing to save turrets from destruction.

Release tier 8 and 9 to be purposefully bad Release tier 10 with balans accuracy and salvo weight, so everyone spend free exp to skip trashwagons Nerf new T10 once sufficient amount of free exp was spent, because spreadshiet says so

Wargaming simply follows where money is.

Kansas and Minnie are considered "balanced" with worse penetration and accuracy than existing same tier US BBs, for how long you think Vermont will stand without those "balancing features"?

Which means, whole tactic is working just fine. After all, why change something if it just keeps bringing profit?

Welcome to russian capitalism comrade.

You know what has even higher chance of not seeing carriers? Not playing the game you don't like.

On positive, with 938th battle onwards you will start actually making credits with service savings from that perma camo Which is sort of in line with "normal" perma camos available for doubloons - T8 perma camo will pay for its value in credits after 600th battle. On other hand, T10 perma camo will start delivering credits after 84th battle and that is without 20% extra credits.

Don't forget about Ivan class carriers hailing from tsarist Russia as well

Convince everyone to purchase tier 3 ship for 100€ and WG will happily deliver

That way you can play Alsace when playing Alsace when playing Alsace. With success of ARP Yamato we will see splurge of purchasable T10s. Austin on other hand... would be interesting tier 7 ship, not T10. Now with 8s reload and "ermagad SAP" that hits for less than CA HE shells

Well, it prevents dealing damage to T8+ heavy cruisers hulls, especially in central section where secondaries aim anyway. But, given my own experience in Georgia and Massa, secondaries on those (assuming full Secondary spec) work best at their long range and against "bowtanking" targets - (in)famous US Dual Purpose Mortar steep trajectory actually results in substantial number of superstructure hits against BBs past 10km. Massa and especially Georgia have excellent forward firing arc on secondary battery, allowing them to effectively bowtank themselves and still have 4/10 secondary barrels firing, while all 10 barrels open up before you can bring rear turret to bear. The same secondaries become TOO accurate below 6km and land most of the shells on armored belt/torpedo belt and on amidship, reducing amount of fires they can trigger. On upside, they are absolutely disgusting against destroyers at those distances.

Alternatively allow disabling "black" ships in port filters, that way these ships could get basic permanent camo looks.

Moskva, Stalin, Kremlin and Petro have surprisingly good captain synergy in general Moskva sheds concealment completely and her citadel sticks out like sore thumb, making any glimpses at broadside very noticeable. AP pen is worse so she can't reliably threaten broadside BBs outside what can be considered "short range", HE shells and reload are better, thus she is bit more suitable for bow on standoffs