Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Panocek

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    13,176

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    13617

Everything posted by Panocek

  1. Panocek
    And European 120mm guns, of which you have two-three gun hoses - Halland twins and Friesland. And unlike UK 113, those don't have magic AP to save the day.
  2. Panocek

    Odin M.I.A

    Panocek replied to Kr1gsG4ldr's topic in General Discussion

    Anchorage is about to be added to the Azur Lane, doesn't mean she will return to WoWs in any way, shape or form. If there would be any new ships that would be released as part of AL collab, those would be hinted in devblog under "normal" names and overlap with AL equivalents? And there are none that would overlap with AL so far.
  3. Panocek
    Which is saying something, as until lidlkreuzers there were TWO T10 destroyers with more than 19mm midsection
  4. Panocek

    Azur lane PR4 Ships collab with WOWS

    Panocek replied to Vinyl_ScratchPlays's topic in General Discussion

    Iowa isn't exactly "overperforming" ship to begin with, so literally copypasting her would be safest and quickest bet for WG. They can copypaste Kii as Suruga as well. AL Hyuuga as Ise copy, because hybrids are such popular ships now
  5. Panocek
    Roon/Sanrui have torps instead secondary gun equipment, doesn't stop them from getting second Main Gun mount as you feed them blueprints. And this I guess would be the case with Anchorage, alongside "smoke" skill and trash AA stat.
  6. Panocek

    Azur lane PR4 Ships collab with WOWS

    Panocek replied to Vinyl_ScratchPlays's topic in General Discussion

    They can always yoink Shinano hull from alpha times and put some tatonkas on it to sell for 35k dubs alongside some live testing/rebalancing Also Shimakaze haven't made it to the Azur Lane proper, so far she is present in Crosswave spinoff. Though given New Jersey made some waves recently in AL, never say never to T9 Iowa copypaste.
  7. Panocek

    Azurlane collab this year ?

    Panocek replied to Samyuel's topic in General Discussion

    Obviously WG will copypaste stuff just to put anime tiddies on it
  8. Panocek
    PR4 announced and they will be coming soon, like 8th of July soon (?) Hakuryu, DR Agir, DR August von Parseval Anchorage Marco Polo
  9. Panocek

    The cost of "service" after Battle a should be cheaper

    Panocek replied to Condensadordefluzo's topic in General Discussion

    Thats the very point. To convince players to open their wallets for premium account and premium camouflages. And no, its not going to be changed, like ever. This very "formula" of nigh unsustainable hightiers was first introduced back in World of Tanks decade ago and was one of the ingredients needed to launch Wargaming from backwater company to worldwide corporation. So why they would kill goose that lays golden eggs?
  10. Panocek

    New rocket mechanics in Detail

    Panocek replied to totally_potato's topic in General Discussion

    If you're flak collector, then yea, "many DD" have "impressive AA suite". But beyond that, you're talking about Halland twins, Friesland and maybe Ostergotland that can actually hope to accomplish something with their AA package.
  11. Panocek
    According to skreeeddit, yes
  12. Panocek
    Lootershooter the Wargambling way Kitakami, does that name ring a bell? You know, the ship, that supposedly had more friendly kills than enemy kills during CBT
  13. Panocek
    @YabbaCoe @Tanatoy If Friesland as part of European tree is considered no bueno anymore, why not stick to the "Friesland" name but with NL flag instead? EU and NL Frieslands are supposed to be identical gameplay wise and last time I've checked, only visible indication of ship nation is tiny flag that will be missed 99.999% of the time. There could be 1 month "grace" option where players could request transfer Friesland from European to Netherlands tech tree, be it via support of in game automated button. ORP Błyskawica moved to separate Polish tech tree, alongside Polish destroyers when
  14. Panocek
    AFAIK WoT CW started with tank lock to begin with. And in WoT, to achieve anything on CW map you HAD to be full strength clan capable of fielding multiple teams every evening, otherwise you'd get wiped off the map in no time, assuming you've managed to secure province to begin with. With supposed intention of "team diversity" on WG part, you have either limiting number of ships per team, or way more profitable from company perspective, ship lock. Also it would suddenly force people to play and master CVs, as one-two CV mains per clan suddenly won't do
  15. Panocek
    Assuming, lets say, 3-5 battles per evening and ships being locked out for, lets say 72h, you'd run out of three rentals on day one. You'd lock your 6 T10s by time rentals come back online at 3 CBs/evening pace. I'm not familiar with CB schedule, but if those aren't played daily, then ship lock can be easily extended to week or more Drastic concealment nerf, to bring Petro in line with Moskva and Stalingrad or major citadel raise, to make her vulnerable to being caught broadside, just like two OG ruski supercruisers. Petro as of now, combines great tanking capabilities due to generous amounts of 50mm plating and waterline citadel that is also protected by remarkably thick plating by cruiser standards, thus even when caught broadside she's somewhat unlikely to get one way gulag ticket on the spot.
  16. Panocek
    Why not go step further and lock ships out of CBs for few days/week after battle. World of Tanks I think had/still have such feature in their Clan Wars, to "promote" panic spending to get as many T10s as possible, otherwise you'd literally run out of ships to boat around
  17. Panocek
    You mean figure out next Best in Slot, so it can be limited to 1 per team too later on. WG could as well skip the middle man and limit all ships to 1 per team
  18. Panocek

    Customer support: what kind of people are employed there?

    Panocek replied to Northern_Nightowl's topic in General Discussion

    Well, "generic copy/paste answers" usually solve 80% of cases, as long as user query is actually read and understood, so correct copy/paste can be applied
  19. Panocek

    Warships Size Comparison: Destroyers

    Panocek replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements

    At the same time, I wouldn't mind "paper" ships to be present in size comparison, as long as their specs and "paper project/cancelled order/WG made what-if" notice would be present. But then, I recall screeching about "what are paper ships doing in my ship comparison doing", so case of damned if you do, damned if you don't
  20. Panocek
    In other words, water is wet
  21. Panocek
    Kinda forgot of this thread existence. AL wise, I've managed to snatch all ships sans Ticonderoga within 90 builds, including three Archerfishes Besides that, I've picked up Honkai Impact 3rd out of boredom, thanks to randomly stumbling on one of their animated shorts and Genshin being drier than a drywall in terms of content. And story I find to be actually good in Honkai
  22. Panocek

    PP w niszczycielu

    Panocek replied to Blackdovski's question in Pytania od nowych graczy

    Pociski AP potrafią być zaskakująco skuteczne przeciw krążownikom oraz pancernikom, kiedy będziesz celował po nieopancerzonych sekcjach, którymi najczęściej jest dziób i rufa. Nadbudówka może być za słabo opancerzona i mogą wchodzić nadpenetracje, więc miej to na uwadze. No i jak to AP, kąty rykoszetu wciąż obowiązują.
  23. Panocek

    US heavy battleships

    Panocek replied to Fulcrum60's topic in General Discussion

    Given each salvo is more than able to demolish any target when shells connect, maybe make your shots count instead going trigger happy? Also there are only 12 enemy vessels to shoot at, few of which will be sunk by teammates... Probably
  24. Panocek
    So, Kitakami release to wider public is a go?
  25. Panocek

    Z 31, the floating turd

    Panocek replied to 22cm's topic in General Discussion

    It is intended to be balanced by not playing it, due to magic of Free Exp After all, spreadshiet won't point out she needs buffs when everyone can see her being an epic turd to the point everyone just skip her with fxp
×