Vogel

Good. I'd hate to be someone that shouts "brah, like, for realz, dude, etc." every fifth second.

I think they are going for the "British standard" of giving it away on the 25th.

My monstrosity ship has been finished for quite a while now, but it is first now that I've had the time to write a post about it. So here goes, entry in the spoiler below.

Problem solved

They are very good. Its just that people are accustomed to the more "Hollywood" soundset rather than what we have now. I'm not saying that the sounds ingame are realistic; they just "feel" more realistic.

Notice the "can". I'm fairly confident that they are aware the the issue, but they can't exactly say that they messed up the economy for paying customers.

The essex is only listed for an XP boost, so no credit buff to that particular ship in this patch.

Simple answer: They haven't. Only XP gain got buffed

Greetings After having played a couple of matches with my Minekaze I've come to the conclusion that no matter how good I cap and spot, you can't win if your CAs go Rambo in the beginning into the cap points, BBs lacking situational awareness and CVs that have forgotten to put coal in their boilers. Nevertheless, some ships are more suited to ranked than others. Therefore the question stands: which ships are the best for T5/T6 and T7/T8. Preferable sort them in what order you think they perform best. I'm opening this topic partly because I wonder what kind of ships players are having the most success in and partly if I should abandon my Minekaze for something else. Perhaps New York/New Mexico, but they seem a tad slow for this mode.

^Kiev was overperforming, therefore the nerf. Blyskawica might be a tad too good as well, but WG has negative experiences from nerfing premium vehicles. THose that had bought them previously tend to be outraged from the change.

Well, I think you can retrain for silver to get 3 points. Just do it like you would retrain a captain from another ship.

they've (finally) added a non-bundled option: https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/wows/specials/2873/ So buy this one instead of the other offer.

A Quarter Quell, huehue?

My question still stands regarding ST though. Anyone care to illuminate me on the hardship of your work and how WG is entitled to the sweat of your brow?

"Want to know the truth of the Super tester drama? Then pay £40 to see previously unreleased footage showing beyond doubt if Ducat is a criminal, or a saint"

And the point of this topic is?

Remain sceptical, but not passing any judgement. The explanation has some merit, but doesn't explain the constant editing of taking down screenshots, saying it is scalable crosshairs, etc. The posted "recreated video" is also an indicator, but it's only circumstantial "evidence". In any case, poor handling of the failed joke or aim-assist cover-up nevertheless. Don't care, bundles more important EDIT: Since we got so many Supah Testurs here anyway: How many hours on average does it take each week to be a SP? Thinking of applying, but I wont do so unless I know I have the time for it.

Tirpitz NA server: 66/69 USD (from memory) RU server: 50 USD (link) EU server ??? SEA server: 52 USD We've had this discussion plenty in the past, but then there has been some comments from the WG staff regarding "fairness", that we only want good things for ourselves, but not extend it to the other servers. So I'd like to post a question that is not directly related to bundles, but why all servers can't have similar shop philosophy? Why all this very different specials that plainly favours one geographic region over the others? I realise that we have different average income, but that hasn't stopped WG in the past. Earlier, before all these bundles, all servers got almost the same price for the same vehicle in WoT. The difference was mainly due to currency fluctuations, and whether or not you paid for the garage slot. So maybe I'm a bit of a idealist, since I believe everyone should be treated the same, regardless of race, nationality, sex or education (in terms of behaviour). At least when the premise is identical. And yes, some of us don't like bundles. But I'm mainly interested in what you think regarding server differences, not if you like bundles or not. So please try to be polite, so this thread doesn't get Vukked immediately.

I don't really care either way. It just annoys me why on earth someone would open op a topic where they ridicule an aim-assist accuser, only to provide screenshots that apparantly showcases an aim assist. That bothers me much on an intellectual level, because I can't understand the logic behind it.

Problem is that Ducast hasn't really said anything other than "It's a distance marker zoom" and "I don't use aimmod. No explanation has yet to be given for those red lines with circles attached. If that can be explained in a reasonable fashion, then this thread would die out in nothing. Sadly, the current approach does not do Ducast any favours. Dissing someone for accusing him of using aimbot, having those pictures and then trying to hide everything is not the right way to go. I'm fine with whatever happens next, but must admit I lost a little respect for him due to the way this was handled.

Ducast, you uploaded those screenshots and edited your own post out later..... Regardless, as far as I know, WG mods can see the full edit history of every post on this forum.

Well ,nothing to do than wait for now. So might as well calm down until tomorrow

I have a number theory exam tomorrow. My English.exe has been put on limited resources until further notice.

Ducat stated it was scalable UI, but that is certainly not the case, unless it is some very new functionality was added to Aslans. I will not be accusing anyone just yet, but I hope we can have an explanation of what that really is. I hope it is not a prank, because then it is somewhat distasteful. @above: You can't go around quoting someone and then expect people to understand that you are referring to someone completely different. As it is now, it seems you demand (perhaps strong word, can't find a better one ATM. I'm not a native speaker) an answer from Shepbur from what Ducat had posted.

I'm not twisting anything. You basically demanded Shepbur to "comment on the elephant in the room" merely because he is a Supertest Coord. I just provided an example of why that is silly; not being offended or anything.