-
Content Сount
4,379 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
-
Clan
[110]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by SeaMonsterUK
-
Not to mention that every ship that hits you seems to do full damage or citadel hits constantly.
-
The one thing I do really hate about British ships, is the ease you can Citadel them, took the Belfast out, and got hit by a Salvo that took me from over 35000 HP to under a 1000 HP.... If it's not for the fact that you rarely get Citadels in them they are definitely underpowered.
-
This the results of just one game with the Emerald, the only good point about the cruiser? Torpedoes! They are amazing The ship is still crap mind you.
-
Super Container Loot Thread [ topics merged ]
SeaMonsterUK replied to ThePurpleSmurf's topic in General Discussion
Got a 5 Million Credit super crate -
On that note when are we getting HMS Conquoror?
-
World of Warships/Tanks/Warplanes are broken as well.
-
Or Wargaming could, you know, actually fix the line. The Danae is mediocre at best, it's a manageable ship, but when you get to the Emerald.....
-
If you like Mortars on a ship and not guns then yes it does work in concept, but they are guns so no, the concept is a complete fail.
-
Don't give me the Balance BS. We all know it's not because of balance. And it maybe a game, but you still need to give each ship justice, and right now, the Royal Navy has been given none.
-
And I disagree with this, the Trajectory makes them look more like they are firing mortars, certainly not representative, and does not give the ship's justice whatsoever.
-
I think you missed the point, the main problem with the cruisers is the shell trajectory, it is not representative nor does it bring justice to them.
-
Just shows that Wargaming.net gives the finger to it's own testers. The cruisers are rubbish between tier 3 and 5, and no justice has been shown to them. And I ain't going to believe it's because of Game Balance.
-
Game balance for the overly exaggerated arc from these British mortars guns? I don't see how we can call that balance. As a Brit I can definitely say Wargaming hasn't done the Royal Navy cruisers any justice at all.
-
Which is why it needs a flatter trajectory.
-
Actually I kinda didn't, also Kirov and Emerald are 2 completely different ships, and Kirov I've only done 3 battles in, so you can't exactly compare my stats with the Emerald on that. Also, Emerald has a higher flight trajectory than the Kirov, which is much flatter. And no, not every low tier cruiser is crap or Garbage, St. Louis for example is pretty solid at it's tier. If you are going to post the results of high tier vessels from battles which perform differently to lower tier ships, then your opinions are biased, so yes, there is a very big point if you are going to try and tell others are wrong about a line to come back and play lower tier vessels, such as Caledon and Danae for example. I'll stick with the opinion of that of the Oxford dictionary.
-
The Tier 10 is what I got my sights on.
-
You actually misunderstand my comments. I never said the ENTIRE line was crap, in fact I was also using a bit of satire, with some exaggeration. Also I've never really took anytime on learning to play the Kirov, I've not taken the ship out much when grinding through the tiers is what I want to do. Also, if you are not willing to play Tier 1-5 and only Tier 6+ then your opinions are bigoted. And, you might want to learn that telling someone to **** off is not an insult, just a less polite way of telling someone to go away.
-
Do tier 3, 4 and 5 as well, then you'll see why we say what we say. The first 5 tiers are terrible when it comes to cruisers, and are not on par with cruisers of the same tier. So please, do Tiers 3, 4 and 5 as well or **** off and don't let the door hit you on the way out.
-
If you are going to come out with BS, try posting Screenshots of 1. more than 1 game and 2. of tiers 3, 4 and 5 as well.
-
Royal Navy Battleships, HE only lmao
-
The British cruisers feel like WG gave us a ship armed with group of Ballisters with the projectile flight characteristics of a Trebuchet.
-
No HE would be fine, but AP needs better pen, more damage and flatter trajectory to make them competitive.
-
Yeah, it hunts the DD's so the DD can Torpedo it without many problems
-
Best use of British Cruisers: Target Practice, because those Mortars..... I mean guns, are useless and the AP is dreadfully inadequate, damage is inconsistent. Flatter trajectory would be understandable for an only AP armament.
