Jump to content

Panzergefahr

Players
  • Content Сount

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    2546

About Panzergefahr

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

66 profile views
  1. Panzergefahr

    It's a pity that Graf Zeppelin has no Stuka dive bombers

    Maybe that angry reviewer is to blame for the removal of Stukas. Lets search him up for a good kill
  2. Panzergefahr

    It's a pity that Graf Zeppelin has no Stuka dive bombers

    Thats typical for game companies that are mostly interrested in earning big money. Skillful amateurs are often more historically interrested and accurate. BUT if Graf Zeppelin would have Stukas it would also sell much better for sure.
  3. Panzergefahr

    It's a pity that Graf Zeppelin has no Stuka dive bombers

    I want to add another thing but I don´t know if its psycially possible to make. They dive bombers should be set for a higher altitude before starting the dive (this isnt only mentioned for Stukas). Now the planes start their bomb runs from such a ridiculously low altitude that diving almost loses the purpose of surprise.
  4. Panzergefahr

    It's a pity that Graf Zeppelin has no Stuka dive bombers

    I don´t care if Stukas are "to slow" because they are historically correct and cool for people who are interrested in WW2. Like some guys here suggested they could let Stukas be more accurate bombers instead. As it is now it looks like they have implemented the wrong model by mistake (and yes, it really is a damn mistake).
  5. Panzergefahr

    It's a pity that Graf Zeppelin has no Stuka dive bombers

    I suppose that WG feared that Graf Zeppelin would be a little to popular with Stukas and especially with the famous sirens mounted. Another guess is that they think that it would glorify the "dreaded nazi Stukas". Personally I hate such a cowardly and unhistorical perspective in games and why then do they approve several models of Stuka in World of Airplanes?? With other words: GIVE US STUKAS FOR GRAF ZEPPELIN!!
  6. Panzergefahr

    [Guide] Basic CV gameplay

    Thanks SSA for your important information. Just one more question; is it not longer possible to send up and alter between several squadrons in the air?
  7. Panzergefahr

    [Guide] Basic CV gameplay

    So its not possible anylonger to set pathways for the squadrons? Do you know why they made that change? Am I not even able to see the auto-drop-reticule nowadays?
  8. Panzergefahr

    [Guide] Basic CV gameplay

    I get so frustrated over that I only are able to set pathways for my carrier and not for the squadrons. If I chose to send up for example torpedo bombers by double-clicking at the 2 button I am still not able to set a pathway for them on the minimap. What squadron I ever chose the damn carrier is affected instead and is immediately turning into another route on the map. So how do you do it?! Its not either possible for me to see a so called "circle of death" around enemy ships that I wanna attack (the circle that sets the limit of your manual control of the squadron). With other words, the only unit I can control and affect at the minimap is the carrier itself
  9. I have watched several videos that shows that you shall be able to mark out at the minimap where you want a specific squadron to fly. But even if I repeatedly hammer on for example the 2 button for torpedo bombers and point out at the map where I want them to go the damn air carrier is the only unit that is affected and gets a new path. This makes me furious because I have really done everything now but the squadrons are only affected by manually steering them in front of me
  10. I have tried for days to make the Wwise Launcher give me the possibility to install version 2016.2.1.5995 for sound modding. Can I get it from somewhere else?
  11. Panzergefahr

    Admiral Hipper wasnt named just Hipper!

    That name is a little different because "Graf Spee" still looks okay and in historical books it is often written like that. Hipper looks bad and silly without Admiral.
  12. Panzergefahr

    Admiral Hipper wasnt named just Hipper!

    Yes why not make the list a little wider instead? Just Hipper looks cheap and false compared to the mighty Admiral Hipper so I will probably never get used with that childish cut off.
  13. Panzergefahr

    Admiral Hipper wasnt named just Hipper!

    ​ I can´t see a problem with showing the full name and Hipper sounds so cheap, like a second hand version
  14. Panzergefahr

    Admiral Hipper wasnt named just Hipper!

    Please give "Admiral Hipper" the full historical name back! "Hipper" sounds like a little destroyer more than the heavy cruiser it actually was. Whatever reason you had for the change it must have been pretty unecessary because the only little problem was that you couldnt show the full name in the battle list (no big deal).
  15. Panzergefahr

    General Feedback

    Please give "Admiral Hipper" the full historical name back! "Hipper" sounds like a little destroyer more than the heavy cruiser it actually was. Whatever reason you had for the change it must have been pretty unecessary because the only little problem was that you couldnt show the full name in the battle list (no big deal).
×