Hedgehog1963

Connery is Bond. The others are just people playing Bond.

I've advocated this myself for the reason of stopping BBs camping a very long way behind the battle. As it is my plucky unarmoured DD is taking all the risks close to the enemy fleet lighting up targets and they sit as far away as they can trying and failing to hit anything at extreme range. I should be able to tell my radio room to go silent. It is MY radio room.

James Bond has the rank of Commander in the RN. I don't mind this promo. If I do decide to go further down the USN DD line having a commander with a head start to replace the 15 pointer i have in the Benson at the moment will be useful. Ditto those very nice flags. As far as Segal as an Actor... He was OK in the kind of films I enjoyed when I was in my 20's. Nowadays I need something more sophisticated which is able to make me think.

So far I've found that as long as you have someone spotting the enemy, you can sit practically invulnerable in smoke and melt enemy DDs and cruisers. Seriously... sailing near my Leander in a Cleveland will be your end. Downsides are you are vulnerable to enemy fire and your AP isn't going to penetrate the armored belt of a BB. You do need to hit the BB above it's hull and you can do about 800+ damage a salvo.

Well I only have one Tier IX ship, Kagero, but I have the Fletcher unlocked. It might be time to move on from the Benson. 50 wins is less than a win a day.

When you get detonation you get ten no detonation flags ... so....

I don't get why AP has zero chance to cause a fire... I'd understand a very reduced chance compared to HE but zero chance means it is impossible to hit anything flammable on a target vessel.

"Stray shell" - no.

Maybe someone who doesn't know it knows it now...

So I followed this and my game looks better

I'll have to go and find the video when I can access YT at home (I can't here at work). I followed it and it worked for me. Not just the quality of the rigging but the railings and the ships themselves were markedly improved.

Murmansk will have sold better than it might otherwise have because it had better torpedo armament. Why is this not obvious?

OK give Atlanta what you suggest.... ..... but remove her HE

Right OK... I watched and followed the instructions of some helpful person on You Tube by changing my Nvidia settings having turned off the antiailiasing in the in-game settings section. They are way way better than you can achieve in-game.

OP seems to have a sore bottom...

What you say is true, and they don't understand that.

WoT is the same. Threads just like this where the better players try to get the game changed so they can win even more. No. Being stuck on a bad team is as much a part of the game as anything else. Get on with it.

Problem isn't the maps compared to you not playing properly out of petty spite.

Royal Navy is best navy. Well it was this time.

They're only two-puffers, so I can't see it being too much of an issue.

Your grammar suggests otherwise.

I'm with OP. We should be able to collect containers with less time wasted. The novelty wore off very quickly. Also an appreciation of a well written opinion.

+1 Map design called "Cotton Wool."

What we really need to do is allow the ships which are close to the enemy to switch off telling their own team where the enemy are. I'm out risking my neck in a DD while camping BBs farm damage on my spotting while taking no risk themselves. I should be able to toggle my radio room from telling the cowards at the back where to shoot.