Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Hedgehog1963

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    3,211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    14951
  • Clan

    [BONUS]

Everything posted by Hedgehog1963

  1. Money isn't the only asset. Playing is the equally important asset. If there are no players there is no game. So the other protest available is not playing. I hardly played in this calendar year because of the lack of Royal Navy Tech Tree. I play every day now.
  2. It's a business. They can do what they want. If you don't like it your wisest choice is not to play.
  3. Because copy and paste is easy.
  4. Each is a separate business. Don't like it? What are you going to do?
  5. Hedgehog1963

    Too many DD

    Never seen more than 4 a side. Never can have too many. 12 D vs 12 at any tier would work for me.
  6. I've just had a blinding flash, bases on OPS observations in the Battle of the North Cape thread. Why not greatly increase the XP and credit rewards generated by secondary armament? Might encourage the BBs who would otherwise just sit at the back and borderline snipe? Maybe nerf the XP and income for the main battery, or even half the overall productivity if no secondary armament damage was inflicted. I'm happy to be told why this won't work... Ans sorry if it was already suggested, search reveals nothing.
  7. Yep. OK my mistake was not taking into account the different relative strengths of the secondary armaments of the various nations. Thanks for the feedback.
  8. Hedgehog1963

    Free Graf Spee

    Can't help feeling it is doable without premium time since it rains Equal Speed Charlie London signals from crates these days.
  9. Hedgehog1963

    Free Graf Spee

    They may die but their baths will be clean.
  10. Hedgehog1963

    Free Graf Spee

    Looks easy, kind of XP I generate anyway, but why is the hardest part set in the period when the "holidays" are over and we're back at work??
  11. Hedgehog1963

    A new (old) favorite, the Kiev

    Generally I don't buy ships back, I recognise i like them as I play them and they become keepers. I've made a deision to keep the Tashkent, for example.
  12. Suggest you do what I did and earn the Xp to unlock the better torpedoes. I now have the F3 torpodoez. 76kt.
  13. Yes I can. I just did. If you do that you're a worse plyer than the ones you criticise.
  14. Hedgehog1963

    Type 16 and 15 Camouflage removal

    Look it up http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Camouflage
  15. Hedgehog1963

    why so many torpedos in the servers?

    Shimakaze be like
  16. Hedgehog1963

    Arizona vs Warspite

    Makes me wonder whether this is because the premium ships get better commanders than you'd expect at that tier. For example I can put a 17 point commander in my Warspite who will be better than his counterpart in a Fuso.
  17. Hedgehog1963

    Gearing

    Then you shouldn't be in a Gearing.
  18. Bound to be true of the teams you play against...
  19. This is a different issue. The only answer you'll get is that it applies to the enemy teams as well.
  20. Exactly my point. People will farm damage and will sometimes do so at the expense of taking other action which might have won the battle... because they know they'll be rewarded anyway as though they won. Leave it as it is. If you want the winning bonus then win.
  21. Hedgehog1963

    Sry if this is a stupid question ..... but

    Some extra XP and credits were gleaned from the access we've had to that camo. We'll be keeping those.
  22. I disagree. Rewarding the best performing players on the losing team will create aberrant behaviour. They'll play to suit themselves rather than serve the team and the whole game will be shot.
  23. No. Rewarding losses as wins would kill the game.
  24. Hedgehog1963

    Admiral Graf Spee

    77 years ago today
  25. Hedgehog1963

    Battle of the River Plate

    I sank six in Leander once. But only once.
×