-
Content Сount
3,211 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
14951 -
Clan
[BONUS]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Hedgehog1963
-
Edited This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inflammatory content
-
Scharnhorst can get in close and overpower. Unless and until WG improve the guns on Hood I'd go German.
-
Protected Matchmaking - Yay or Nay?
Hedgehog1963 replied to JingoJaden's topic in General Discussion
Oh. I thought this was intended to protect Tier V ships from Imperator Nikolai. I think there should be some protection but that it really needs to be rolled back. Reason being making life easier at Tier IV just means more pain at Tier V and it isn't fair for those of us who have Tier V and VI premium content not to get the full benefits. -
Is it feasibile to go over tier 8 without premium account/camo?
Hedgehog1963 replied to Favuz's topic in General Discussion
This is THE essential answer both in ships and tanks. If you choose not to finance your high tier gaming with premium ships and or premium account you can earn the credits by playing lots and lots of profitable mid tier games. This is not a hack or some clever "inside knowledge." No clickbait here. No "Wargaming hates this hack of WoWS." WG designed the game this way. -
I free XP'd all the modules on all the RN cruisers but doggedly ground through them otherwise. Emerald was dire.
-
There's another announcement today that there is going to be a tie-in with the new Christopher Nolan film "Dunkirk" and the picture is of DD h59. https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/common/warner-brothers-in-arms/
-
Conqueror or FV 215b 457?
-
You should stick to North Carolina. You have 42% WR in that. Is that bad MM as well?
-
..so u.s. high tier dd are meant to do what...?
Hedgehog1963 replied to Kutfroat's topic in General Discussion
Flamu's play here is what: -
Thank you for a nice campaign, WG
Hedgehog1963 replied to Phlogistoned's topic in General Discussion
The emblems/insignia are really nice, a complete success. It occurred to me that it would be really nice if the emblem for your ships would be shown in port as you select that ship.- 18 replies
-
Thank you for a nice campaign, WG
Hedgehog1963 replied to Phlogistoned's topic in General Discussion
They have done so in the Tanks. FYI.- 18 replies
-
Thank you for a nice campaign, WG
Hedgehog1963 replied to Phlogistoned's topic in General Discussion
Agreed, they are beautiful work.- 18 replies
-
Leander, Anshan, Perth, Warspite.
-
kids today....
-
Correcting myself just now: I have 212 Juliet Charlie Flags and I do have the ammo stowage module running on Belfast.
-
In the case of detonations it is not the only option because of that module. As I recall we were given a lot of them for free when they were introduced.
-
Well I can see the issue with the flags - I'll tell you that I quite often stop playing WoWS after I've opened my second container each day because of this. Right now I'm out of Equal Speed Carlie London. I don't have your issue though; I'm sat on hundred or more of the no detonation variety, and that's because I use the module. I played a fair bit yesterday. Was in the mood. I lost Belfast and Gremyashchy to detonations. I don't use the module on Belfast. Bad luck with the other for me.
-
Well you've given me some information for which thanks.
-
"Random" as in "magazine explodes when hit with enough oomph?" You then go on to make statements of which I want proof. How do you know you can't minimise the chance by turning your vessel? I do agree there should be a commander skill along the lines of "safe stowage" in WoT but maybe with a rate-of-fire penalty.
-
Battle of Jutland - still a no show in WOWS
Hedgehog1963 replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
They sold Warspite and Campbeltown in a bundle about a year ago and that Jutland flag was a bonus. I fly it on nearly all my ships nearly all the time. -
Yes I did read your original post which is why I asked the question. Did it occur to you why I asked that question? Use the module instead of the flags. This is no different to putting a wet ammo rack in a tank that is prone to ammo racking. You lose something by doing so (that slot could have taken something better) but you gain a modicum of protection. It's all trade off.
-
Well then you've yourself to blame. Close the thread.
-
So does OP use the module that reduces detonation chance by 70%?
-
Yes I was stood right next to it.
-
Knew what this was going to be before I opened the thread...
