Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Hedgehog1963

Beta Tester
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    3,211

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    14951

  • Clan

    [BONUS]

Everything posted by Hedgehog1963

  1. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    Is WOWS not successful?
  2. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

  3. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    You're younger than I expected.
  4. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    If you read through the thread my posts have already covered most of those. I'm not going to repeat them all just for you.
  5. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    I never said it was impossible. Again with the strawman.
  6. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    The depth and complexity is the decisions you have to make whether to deploy a counter to detonation, costing you things that you might deploy instead i.e. another module or signal in those slots. Those counters exist as a control of detonation. Can't be a clearer notion to understand. In DD's I run the module, and it hasn't failed me yet. I decided that the risk to my weapon systems was worth it and so far no detonations.I run the signal when I play in Belfast when I'd like to be running another XP boosting signal. That's the choice I had to consider and the decision I made before hitting the battle button.
  7. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    Now you're doing the same thing, failing to handle the notion that someone on the internet disagrees with you. "You are right without a question, so everybody else has to change their opinion to fir your agenda." This is what is known as "strawman" since you are putting words in my mouth and ascribing motivation to me that is false. I'm just putting my point of view across. Purpose of a forum is debate. Purpose of debate is to put across one's opinion and perhaps persuade the others of the merit of the viewpoint, but perhaps not. That's what I'm doing ...while you are losing it. I'm not fighting for anything... I can see why detonation exists and the counters available. And as far as mine not being the popular view point is concerned, so what? so I'm wrong to say so when I have a different opinion? No. Get over it.
  8. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    When the tread was a circlejerk, sure. Everyone agreeing with each other Yes I can disagree with someone's opinion if it seems wrong to me. I disagree with your opinion on this by example. Everyone not. Strawman again. At least you didn't reach for the caps button.
  9. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    I think that you're exhibiting classic "player three has entered the game." Try talking about the topic instead of what you think I've said about someone else. He was clearly having a hard time handling me having a different opinion to him. I didn't critics him for arguing but the way he did it. Abd then you go on and try to tell me I can't disagree with your opinion I think it is wrong. That is what drives debate when the facts are established. And please lay off with the strawman and the caps. Hey I've got an idea... Why not talk about detonation?
  10. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    Show me where I've criticised someone for having an opinion. Hint: Disagreeing with someone's opinion is not that.
  11. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

  12. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    I have a different opinion than yours. Get over it.
  13. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    What IRL argument? DDs are more fragile in the game.
  14. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    It is part of the DDs existence to be fragile. Maybe you also think it unfair DDs have fewer hitpoints than a BB?
  15. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    I'm not the one detonating...
  16. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    You say its not fair as though that's a fact. It's not a fact its your opinion. Again in any argument we get to the point where someone says I said something I didn't. I don't "like" the detonation mechanics, I just don't mind it. The point of the module is that you have to sacrifice something to run it, just as you do with any module. And as I've said I've had no detonations when using one.
  17. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    I did read your whole post. Since you didn't seem to read mine I repeated what I said.
  18. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    If you can reduce the chance you do have control.
  19. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    If the module reduces the chance by 70% it is by definition a counter to detonations. It reduces the chance to so small a likelihood. I haven't had a detonation while using one.
  20. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    Did you make any sound decisions to prevent detonation? Or where you gaining other advantage and were prepared to take that risk?
  21. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    Can't remember when I last detonated. I usually run the module on DDs, flags on premium cruisers and on no others. So 11 detonations in 3500 battles is an issue for you?
  22. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    You can use the module to reduce the chance. That module you refer to as "useless." Obvious where the problem lies.
  23. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    You do have control. Module and flags.
  24. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    It's not BS. they exist and they provide you with a means to counter them. All part of the depth and complexity of the game.
  25. Hedgehog1963

    This is getting [edited] old WG

    Hedgehog1963 replied to ClappingLollies's topic in General Discussion

    You have 30% of the already tiny chance you had of detonating. If you're not prepared to listen to advice why post? Oh whining.
×