Ubertron_X

Of the available 18 LM's I have managed to accquire 5 so far and 2 just being a couple of base XP before completion (so 7 in total) since those have been introduced, and they have been around for a while now. And the last 3 of those I even rushed a little because of the announced changes, else I would have have probably stayed at 4 for quite some time to come. I am currently at my 3rd x2 bonus reset, so I guess we will see three to four x2 resets per year. So for me the time scale is not the issue, however I have to admit that I am not a player with a "right now, right here" mentality and up to now never ever played T10 to grind a module. I played T10 when in div or during clan wars and when the module was finished it was finished. However I still have issues with the planned changes, as multiple items (namely ships & LM's) in the RB will in future compete with each other regarding how to spend your resarch points whereas now you can do both in parallel. Also if you need one to two resets to accquire LM's they will probably need to be buffed to justify the price tag and thus ending up mandatory equipment. Overall I am therefore not very happy with the changes.

If the profile is correct he should be fine with Alabama, Harekaze and Eugen.

From the perspective of game design 5 instead of 3 is the next best number when going for a "rock, paper, scissors" approach. Instead of being strong against one class and weak against another, you can be strong versus 2 classes and weak versus 2 other. So when coming from this direction having 5 classes of ships in your game makes a lot of sense, however I doubt that WG will be able to implement a satisfying 5 class balance, simply due to the asymetric nature of warfare for said classes.

You did good. I just needed 180 tokens and got 130 in my last 7 containers...

All worked, thank you!

Legendary Radionov family! Forward, for the glory of the motherland! Proud father: Proud sons: (Ivan actually was my very first captain that came with my beta Gremyashchy)

All the German players be like:

While I truely appreciate better flooding chances as a torpedo user, when on the receiving end I still insta damage con any flood I can. Interestingly not because of the damage but mostly because of the reduction of speed that comes with each flood. Depending on ship type it is the secondary effect of fires (increased visibility) and floods (loss of speed) that can get you killed really, really fast.

Did mission set 1-3 and got some one-time random containers (honestly don't know from where). 1000 tokens so far.

Sorry, Bourbon <> Bernadotte.

Thanks!

In principle yes, but OPs fact remains that you'll need approx. 30 BB shells to sink one because all you'll ever get in between your reloads is overpens. Other cruisers are far bigger threats to a Smolensk in the open than any BB is.

How about 28 seconds of immunity timer once in a while in addition to already being on fire?

Benutze Ihn seit den englischen Kreuzern auch das erste mal und habe beim Freispielen nicht großartig aufgepasst, also quasi ein Feature und kein Bug?

Again no radar love...

Shot down an "all time high" 51 planes yesterday in my Des Moines while mostly using sector reinforcement, Def AA and AAM2 (no AA captain skill or flag involved and I was not even aware that I still had the module mounted) however the most contributing factor probably was the enemy CV, as previous posters already noted.

I usually use Sarushima Base to calm down my laptop, but I do not have exact figures...

Having not played them (yet) and only based on what I can see from the news article and techtree data with their heal, high arc & mediocre reload, strong HE, short range, good concealment and very usable torps I am getting some strong Atago/Takao vibes. So what is your take on the new cruiser line? Even more HE spam? Suitable as open water cruisers or dependent on island? etc.

Currently working my way back in the second line. First line reset was USN BB because this was one of the first lines that I brought to T10 years ago and I simply wanted to test Colorado and North Carolina again. Second one I reset was SN CA because I was terrible with the Donskoi back in my day and I wanted to try again, currently at Chapayev. Next one to reset probably IJN DD because I think this was the first one I leveled when the game started. Note that I did not plan to use the RB in the first place, however as I ran out of lines to grind I decided to give it a try and to run it along my daily grind.

Use [1953] to trigger...

One. The T5 of course...

Unfortunately the problem with chatsystems working like twitter is a couple of catches. First, what is considered offensive differs from person to person even for words that may generally be considered rude in some parts of the world. Second, and I have brought up that many times, time constraints. When playing a multiplayer PvP game (even a slow one like WoWs) you simply don't have the time to write a 100% nicely worded multi-page essay of e.g. why your aggressive push for the cap needs to be supported at this place and time and why all the battleships staying back at 20+ km are not helping much and will likely lose the game. The advantange of phrases like "potato" is that they are short and concise, the disadvantage is that they rightfully might be considered as rude. Putting your points across in the least amount of time usually involves using stronger phrases (anyone that has served at least some time in the army or similar organisation will understand). Note that I am not promoting use of toxic or profane content in any way, but I can easily see why many players "fall for it", get banned and ask themselves, what did I do wrong?

That is because Venezia is only able to hit you every 20 seconds but the attention span of the average player is somewhere in between 0.1 to 19.99 seconds. /s