Jump to content

PaddyOricK

Players
  • Content Сount

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    545

About PaddyOricK

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia
  1. PaddyOricK

    Admiral Hipper model / Hull B model historically incorrect

    That is good news indeed. Let's hope they don't take too long with it. Thank you very much for this information!
  2. PaddyOricK

    Prinz Eugen premium or standard?

    All right, thank you for your information.
  3. PaddyOricK

    Admiral Hipper model / Hull B model historically incorrect

    Those are nice schemes Trigger_Happy_Dad! Thank you for posting them.
  4. PaddyOricK

    Prinz Eugen premium or standard?

    I am not that new to Wargaming Forums. I know how it "works" from the World of Tanks community. So I do not expect to win that argument, because I do not have the power to sanction anyone. Nevertheless, I still know that I am right. Winning an argument is not equal knowing the truth or being right. An argument is usually won by the side who is in possession of the power to "convince" and not the better argument (truth). Read Michelle Foucault if you want to know more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault LOL! But I have to disappoint you. I won't open up an argument. You simply can't argue with those who are unable to understand the elementary laws of your point of view. The fundamentals have to be same to be even able to start an argument. That won't be the case here where there's neutral consideration and observation on one side and restrictive policy ignoring hostorical facts and documents on the other side.
  5. PaddyOricK

    Prinz Eugen premium or standard?

    *facepalm* The Swastika is a also religious symbol ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika And these pictures are historical documents. So no need to sanction anyone for historical documentation. That it is not a crime at all.
  6. Hipper got the wrong hull. See http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/32730-admiral-hipper-model-hull-b-model-historically-incorrect/ for further information.
  7. Admiral Hipper got the wrong hull. See http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/32730-admiral-hipper-model-hull-b-model-historically-incorrect/ for further information.
  8. PaddyOricK

    Admiral Hipper model / Hull B model historically incorrect

    That is true, but the later version from 1940 just looks so much more sexy!
  9. PaddyOricK

    German Cruisers

    I'd buy Prinz Eugen right away if it was released as a Tier VIII Premium. It is a glorious ship!
  10. As it could be cleary seen in the early preview videos and photos of the German Cruisers the Admiral Hipper is missing three important elements of its later appearance. So far only the early hull from 1937 seems to be available in the game. A picture of this early version from 1937/1939 can be found here: This version has no atlantic-bow, no funnel-cap and no enclosed bridge. All three elements are to be found on the version of the Admiral Hipper from January 1940 onwards after overhaul at Blohm & Voss in Hamburg. So the Hull B of the Hipper should look like this. But this does not seem to be the case for the Hull B ingame. Why did Wargaming not model the Hull B correctly? Are they just too lazy? Further information on the Hipper can be found here: http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/3162-germanys-heavy-cruiser-admiral-hipper/
×