__Helmut_Kohl__

Kearsarge is also a good ship. How is anyone supposed to set a price for the difference in performance? If you want it badly, it is simply a question of your financial situation...

It was FXP/Coal back then, but you can just look at Kearsarge for a comparable doubloon price (19.300).

Heyho, could you please explain what you mean by "a chance" ? If I re-obtain the ship, will I be able to choose the specific resource for the compensation or not? Thx.

The ship probably fun in Ranked, as teams are smaller and you don't meet TX or Subs. Most likely not the most competitive ship, but who cares in the new Ranked system...

So does it have any difference compared to normal Azuma with regard to its performance in battle, or is it just a clone?

1. It was introduced after CV rework and I did not buy it for the same reason then. 2. What's even your point?! The question is why should one buy it now...

Who wants to have to get that close in the CV/Sub meta though? Asashio would be my choice instead.

Isn't normal Azuma in the tech tree for only 1 Mio FXP?

Have you checked out Bayard? Could be your thing...

It has torps - 1x4 each side with 6km range iirc.

Yout get it for the SAP. It's not a brawler. United States?

Makes sense. Thx @Klopirat.

Can you elaborate on the function in question? Guess I missed something.

You can choose up to 3 containers every day after earning 3 respective levels of XP. Does this answer your question or did I get you wrong?

Rules are rules. I will not keep talking to a wall.

This would be just luck then. Thank you for making my point. You lost the argument. This discussion is now closed. According to "my rules", you had your chance and failed. Bye.

You failed to access all other arguments provided. Hence, by "your rules", you lost this argument.

I am interested, whether @Fastmotion has the capability to recognize that he is in fact losing every argument. Because he fails to thoroughly access the arguments provided and basically just says "No" in an unreadable wall-of-text.

Explanation needed. Sample size is too big? Have not heard that one before... What about the stats from the last 21 days then? How did he lose more games than he won then? Now this is a small sample size, which can easily be just luck. That is why you look at a big sample size mate. Sorry, but none of your points were convincing. You are even denying proven facts. Good luck.

Did you consider the possibility that people might get bored of talking to a wall?

You did not get the point mate, so let me make it clear to you: These stats are relevant to the discussion, because they show how exactly this player progressed through the Ranked leagues. This player lost more games than he won and he provided little damage/kills to his teams. He was in fact simply a burden to his teams. This is a proven fact. If he can progress through the leagues with this very performance, the progress cannot be dependent on playing well. If you answer, do it with a list of bullet points please - "your rules", you know...

It is not possible that he is wrong, because I can prove him right. These are the Ranked stats of an anonymous Gold League player (I will not reveal his identity of course): If he was wrong, this player could not be able to play in Gold League. Yet he does.

Yep. Ohio is arguably the most versatile BB in the game. But that is also why I find it boring. I want specialist ships. As I said before, for me Slava is a specialist you want to buy for the enjoyment of rail guns.

The guy who doesn't understand that there is no direct correlation between baseXP and good play? The same guy who keeps insisting that only good players are in "Ranked Gold", even though he got there losing more games than he won, just by spamming a massive amount of games? He is simply ignoring any reasonable argument that doesn't suit him. This comes together with a serious lack of self-reflection. I think nonetheless, that it is only fair to still provide him with reasonable answers to his questions. How else is he supposed to get better?

Get Ohio for Ranked. Apart from that, I don't have to tell you that people in Ranked Gold are actually not better than people in Randoms, as one can progress in Ranked even on a bad WR.