quickr

1. What exactly is the point of a tier 6 clan battle season? What game mechanic are you testing? 2. Why are CVs part of competitive game mode again? Community gave you clear feedback they didn't enjoy last season with CVs in it. 3. If I remember correctly, when CBs were tier 8, rewards were "toned down" to match the tier. Now it's tier 6 and rewards are almost(?) matching tier 10 rewards. Is that an attempt to "bribe" players to participate considering there is a boycott going on right now? 4. If competitive game modes don't have the appeal to broader audience (only small percentage of clans and players participate) why don't you let those that actually play and enjoy clan battles tailor it to their wishes and needs? There are numerous ideas and suggestions out there which would make clan battles more enjoyable.

If I remember correctly, last time it took them couple of months to go thru all the applications. You'll get notified both on forums and email.

Well, there goes my application out of the window

http://shipcomrade.com/?p=4763 Agir Summary: A tier IX Odin in cruiser-form with improved main battery guns, but she has worse protection and secondaries. Siegfried Summary: A tier IX Gneisenau in cruiser-form with better guns, secondaries, torpedoes, AA power, agility and concealment. She is squishier than the tier VII battleship though. Difference Summary: Siegfried and Agir share the same protection scheme agility, concealment and torpedoes. However their weapons differ. Siegfried’s has more powerful 380mm guns, is more accurate, has fewer but (much) longer-ranged secondaries. Agir has 305mm guns and an extra two-pairs of short-ranged secondaries and better torpedo arcs. In addition, Siegfried gets more consumables. Because reasons. Final Evaluation I have nothing but praise for Siegfried and I’m generally dismissive of Agir. The basis of these feels is pretty simple: Siegfried’s game play is new and novel — she’s effectively a glass-cannon version of Gneisenau, greatly improving offense at the expense of durability. Agir, by contrast, is a more-different Odin but she loses out entirely on secondaries and adds durability issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Should be OK, in a appropriate sub forum

I would like to see this as a "ship icon", this style at least. And you can flesh out the blueprint the more modules you unlock. I dunno. I feel like minimum effort was put into "reworking" modules and equipment UI.

Well put and described. Overly simplistic with lot of wasted space. Current xp on a ship is a tiny number, not very intuitively placed. You can see how many XP you need for next ship but not the name of the next ship in line?!?! Consumables, armament and upgrades are only icons, no names (not a problem I guess for seasoned players, but what about new players?)

There is a bug with new russian cruisers: it is possible to stealth radar with them.

I hate the feeling that we are constantly battling against WG when we should be working together to make WOWS a better experience.

No issues on my end. Update was done in 10-15 min.

I've got WoWs installed on two PCs and all this time I've been downloading update on both. Is there a way I can download update (new patch) on one PC, than manually move (copy/paste) on another PC? Thank you!

Same account on two different PCs. I'm not talking about moving entire game (50+GB), That part works. I'm talking about moving just the updated part. 2-3GB that will get downloaded tomorrow. I see "update" folder on my PC but it's empty. Will it fill up tomorrow? Can I c/p it's content to another PC and manually start an updated without downloading it? Run Wows from external disk? never thought of that. It works?

I'm confused, doesn't every patch remove mods? Or you talking about something else?

Joining discord costs you nothing and it doesn't mean you are supporting boycott. There are pro CV players there, involved in arguments and debates. Unfortunately, too many people on discord means not all are able to behave.

Every day you amaze me more and more how little you really know about this game and topics being discussed. They don't need CVs to speed up games, potatoes and glue sniffers already lowered it down to an average of 5-6 min per match. Only special here is you.

Those that support boycott feel that CVs, in their current state, have no place in competitive game. For starters they want CVs removed from any and all competitive game modes. Then they want to sit down and work together with WG (silly, I know, WG and community working together to make better game, crazy) on number of ideas (presented on discord) and see which one can be implemented. Currently there is over 20 ideas, some more some less popular being presented. Instead of listing them all, why not jump on discord and see it for yourself.

You've crossed the line, you are asking too much

I got Georgia, Thunderer and Yoshino out of those you mentioned and have zero regrets obtaining any of them. All 3 are strong ships which I find fun and enjoyable to play. If I had to recommend one tho, it would probably be Georgia.

It makes GPU render some additional images

Obviously things are not working properly when you got 30+ tier 10 ships in port but only 2 or 3 are viable for a competitive game play. Well, obvious to some but not to WG unfortunately. I'm in full support of boycott, well, attempt of boycott, but sadly I don't see it working anytime soon. Number of clans/players willing (not necessarily going) to partake is a drop in an ocean, negligible compared to overall numbers. As long as players/clans are more scared of losing their status, benefits and rewards than actually committing 100%, things won't change.

That is just terrible and promotes even more braindead game play. We should encourage players to get better not worse.

Shame about the Zao UU, I really liked better rudder. That ship really needs something and I don't think its UU was that strong. Entire concept of NTC 2.0 seems like a waste of resources and probably should be dropped. Like many things in wows really.