AgarwaenME

Only if the entire enemy team are idiots. As can a well played BB "control" a massive area...

or "I have absolutely nothing, I know absolutely nothing, so I'll throw in some random whine about them evil women that refuses to have sex with me"

but.. he has 3 battles at tier V, he's the perfect person to explain high tier CV balance.

I understand this might be too complicated for someone who basicly only sits in coop, crying that their teams CV "stole" all their kills, but; CVs don't play like starcraft, not in the least. But keep pretending you have any idea what you're talking about, your complete ignorance on this topic shines through in every thing you write. Artillery in WOT is basicly just tanks with no armour and a large gun that has a slightly different targetting mode. Artillery in wot is - long range (ie longer range than other vehicles) , RNG dependant to hit with the highest alpha, with a top down aim view BBs in wot are - long range (longer than other ship classes), RNG dependant to hit with the highest alpha, with the option of a top down aim view The only thing wot artillery and wows CVs have in common is the pov, as such every other class of ship has more similarities to them. But then that's not why you pull this nonsense out, it's just to have an easy way to insult CVs by comparing it to how people whine abour artillery in wot. It's just a cheap shot with no actual merit, a silly little ad hominem. I mean, if "different" is the only metric, then torp DDs play "differently", gun DDs play "differently", radar DDs plays "differently", .. in the end all ships play "differently" to something else. so if being "different" means being unable to balance things, then you would only be satisfied playing bath tub battles.. but then maybe you fit in those better anyways.

Then why don't you have 20% higher WR in CVs? Not that I think you're so dumb you think CVs don't have to play against the other ships in the game. Fact is, simply being better than the opposing CV is not a guaranteed win. Also, very nice lie to say that WG considers CVs toxic. I mean, it's not like WG ever did changes to appease whiners right? It's not like they've appeased torp whiners, smoke whiners, stealth whiners... to cause a situation where half the ships queued for battle at some tiers are BBs right? But then why expect honesty from someone who simply wants something that limits his own favoured ships removed?

Sure, in the eyes of whiners who only see it from the point of view of being a victim. And who fails to see how the ship class in WoWs that plays closest to either is the battleship.

141 battles fought 0 of them in a CV. Ye, your opinion matters.. Just because something works differently does not mean it can't be balanced. Indeed, CVs abilities are what keeps some ships in check.

Fair enough. Thing is, what doctors do is go - " ok, so you feel like this? then we'll take actual tests to see what's going on" , and not go, "you feel like you have cancer, and since it's somewhat impossible to prove there's no cancer cell or tiny timour somewhere that we couldn't have missed ,we'll do as you ask and put you on the most heavy chemo available". However it's still a very weak position to be in, when you go "I have an unsubstantiated opinion so you need to disprove me or I'm right" (as some in this thread has said). As it is, the only actual metrics we seen here have shown nothing, or very little, difference from prior. Doing your best to dismiss these while providing NOTHING to prove the opposite, while pretending others are biased (or literally pretending WG is lying to their customers), well.. that's religious thinking. With no evidence to the contrary, the only actual sensible position to have is the null hypothesis, ie that nothing has changed.

You seem blissfully unaware of the difference between stock stats, and stats after captain skills and upgrades come into effect. Almost like you're perfectly ignorant.. no, not just almost.

zep Surface Detectability Range16.2 km. Air Detectability Range13.83 km shokaku Surface Detectability Range12.42 km. Air Detectability Range11.97 km. enterprise Surface Detectability Range14.58 km. Air Detectability Range13.77 km. lexington Surface Detectability Range17.46 km Air Detectability Range15.03 km. So, 3rd place out of 4, much best! very bestest!! Since all t8+ CVs have defensive fire, and fairly decent AAA, they ALL "stress" attacking airplanes. Is this a thread where we get to pick one line each that's absurd to the extreme and pick apart?

As others have noted, personal experience is 99.9% worthless. Which is pretty much proven by you suddenly changing your mind about what you think is wrong. You were so sure your "feelings" about dispersion were correct and now you have "feelings" that it's something else. Ofc, 2000 damage isn't even an actual allowable shell damage from a missouri, as overpens are less, and either regular pens or citadel hits are a lot more. Claiming you never get any regular pens ever is just outright insane.

Err.. it's usually facts (ie, results from measurements and experiments) who allows people to build a hypothesis in the first place. And if they have a personal observation, they realise that itself is pretty much worthless, so they go out to get unbiased and reproducible numbers. But here it's basicly only "this is what I feel", against all available evidence, just like the OP that made a ridiculous claim about what sort of results he had before that was easily shown to be false.

First of all, if you actally count those who say you're wrong, they're not half as many as those who say you're right, which isn't surprising as you "see" what you want to see. Nor of course, is "I see it too" with no evidence worth anything in the first place. People who say there's no sudden performance drop is pointing at actual gathered statistics across most of the player base(ie, the non hidden accounts), those who say there is one is pointing at only themselves, and several are even new owners who compare their results to what they've seen from vids and screenshots that far better player have done before, as if they should ever expect such results.

Then how do you explain that there's no actual sudden performance drop overall? /also, since you're so 100% ignorant in all things, there was a huge influx of people buying that ship to get it before it was removed, so you'd expect some overall performance drops with all these people playing a ship they've not played before. But of course, I'm sure it "feels" like it's worse, and everyone knows that "feelings" is the most important scientific metric.

I realise this might be hard for someone who pretends his 150 coop only battles are valuable "experience" to build an "opinion" on that is in any way worthwhile to anyone while merely parroting weak points made by every scrub newbie until they actually started to learn the most simple basics of the game... But you know, you can play ALL nations on one account, sharing free xp, premium time etc etc, so this makes no sense whatsoever (nevermind that it's most likely just a desperate so you can continue to pretend to be what you're not, an experience player of WG titles). /Try to spend more time IN GAME playing against PEOPLE and you'll quickly start to realise how the game actually works, or at least spend it on youtube watching newbie advice videos, instead of making inane whiny threads. //I mean, you have literally ZERO pvp battles.

4x3=12

Then I'd be fairly surprised to be the only DD in a 12 CA match.

There's at least 3 caps for you to go to. If there's FOUR radar capable ships in one cap, GO TO A DIFFERENT CAP. Start the game, LOOK AT THE TEAMS, LOOK AT THE MAP FOR SHIPS TO GET SPOTTED, ACT ACCORDINGLY, DON'T EFFING WHINE IF YOU DO NONE OF THESE.

Just shows how utterly worthless it is when you say you "notice" things.

Did you just answer the wrong person?

"What can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence". Ie, if you just throw out nigh, or entirely, impossible to disprove hypothesises while fielding no evidence whatsoever, then those can be dismissed with little worry whatsoever. Just like any religion, superstition or other nonsense. Ie "Prove you're not working for Gajin, and is only here to trash WG to make them look better by comparison". or just "Prove you're not an alien" And it's actually possible for you to prove yourself correct, find players who consistently perform well above average, yet actually sits at 50% WR over more than a few hundred battles. Ie, find players who are forced close to 50% WR, any, just a single one, that is either substantially worse or better than average, yet sits at 50%.

Learn about the requisite for any hypothesis to be falsifiable before you call anyone else "kid". After this, learn about the burden of proof. Nothing is "right until someone else proves it wrong". Actually, learn about the burden of proof first, understanding that any hypothesis has to be falsifiable to have any worth sorta comes second to this. After getting pointed out your ideas simply don't work, you actually go headlong into building a hypothesis that explains away this (yet provide no evidence for it at all) instead of giving a slightest peruse at the possibility that your initial proposition is just.. wrong. What you're claiming is basicly.. religion, superstition or whatever other nonsense anyone can imagine. In the end, you're playing better than average, and getting better than average results (54-55% is far above average). Your problem seems to be twofold, you imagine you're better than you are, and you imagine your skill level would be able to carry more than 1 game in 20 (it's not that good).

That was your own words. Do try to project less.