AgarwaenME

*Edited

The general rule (and anyone feel free to correct me if there's been any case where this haven't been the case, even in wot or wowp) is that the XP is tied to the place in the tech tree its earned. I mean, could you imagine the complaints if baltimores had their XP moved to t8? You already got a free jump to t8 and the original t6 xp can still be used for the purpose it had before, to research the t7.

There's some openings for DDs to have a good role in most ops, but that often requires you to sit back and do little until then (like defense of newport, where having a DD to do heavy hits on the final wave of BBs is very good). And others were you can do well (say, by running straight for the CVs in aegis, but that could be done as well or better by a CA/CL, your actual best value in that op might very well be to smoke up a friendly CA/CL for the 2nd wave to be able to clear it with minimal damage taken, but that doesn't give you in return personally). Though take raptor and there's more or less nothing you can do there as a DD you wouldn't be able to do better in a different class of ship. Still that doesn't mean a competent player can't still outplay a worse on in a more suitable ship, it just becomes problematic when a bad player picks a poor choice of ship and is ignorant of the ops parameters.

You're reading this on a dead pc?

And just because people like to meme something, that doesn't make it true. Even the most potato 42% players out there can still manage a positive k/d against bots in coop.

Well, they'll just tell their team and the enemy 30 seconds into the battle after their team refuses to follow their commands their intention to suicide, then autopilot straight across the map to let the enemy do it for them. All to be spiteful and childish.

But lets be just a little realistic though. The AI., or rather, the server, knows with perfection how torps are moving and won't accidentally oversteer, and simply cannot have its attention overloaded. This generic "most players" nonsense is just trite, as if "most" of the people spouting it isn't also part of "most" players.

The "problem" is more that there are targets in ops you should not try to torpedo, as you simply reduce your teams ability to delete easy broadside targets, and others that needs to be torped to get them removed quickly. And that requires players to understand what's going on

Talking about people who intentionally suicide to spite teams that don't obey his commands.. The worst of this game.

If you want to cry about exaggerations, I suggest you start looking through this thread from the start instead of picking on it when it suits your bias. As for fewer new players.. that's simple.There's not a limitless amount of possible new players. A large amount of those that would ever be interested in a niche product like this will by now have tried it. It's not really market saturation, it's a case of the market being very limited to begin with. And those players who now try it come from a different mindset and group of gamers, where instant gratification is expected. And in many ways, I prefer this game over many others because the player base does not extend across every border (much like how wot got unplayable for me when it left the niche market). In the end, as I keep saying, it doesn't mean that you can go pick whatever complain you have and pretend any player numbers, retention or whatever can be argued for by this.

Sorry, I didn't realise you were a moderator.. I just made one point, so that will do, leave it as such and there's no more going away from your main topic.

He referred to lack of team play making these ships hard to counter. I simply pointed at his own statements on how he acts in teams and how he's part of that problem. A lack of teamplay causing any ship to be more powerful than it "should" be is no real cause to change those ships.

Then make this quote to the guy who mentioned these things.

This is literally you going "I'm a troll".

You're giving up any pretense at reason.

guy that brags about suiciding on purpose to spite his teams, cries about lack of teamplay

again, a reply that makes no sense whatsoever for the topic at hand

How on earth are those things in any way relevant to that topic? Oh wait, in no ways whatsoever.

frigates are smaller than DDs.

All they're telling us is that you have a very limited experience to base your ideas about DDs on.. And favour playing BBs a lot more. Besides that, they're nothing special.

And people who refer to player numbers (even directly lying so) tend to do so as a replacement for actual arguments about whatever they're for or against, no matter the complete lack of correlation. I mean "why don't a hundred million players play this game?!?!?" is just a nonsense argument. Especially given how NO game, no matter if continually improved and developed, is going to retain all players forever.

Stop saying things that people can quote to laugh at then. Or just to point out your rampant hypocrisy.

What part of "it's doing best of ALL t10 CAs in random battles and is by far the most popular pick in competitive battles" do you fail to grasp? And how do you never get that whenever you make threads like these, and when people uniformly tells you that you're wrong, that you ARE INDEED WRONG.

If you want to see how little use there is to try to teach this person, I welcome you to check his history of threads. At the first case of him facing something he can't handle, it's off to the forums to whine.

Yet you have no problems blaming others for being bad..