AgarwaenME

how u'doin?

People aren't toxic just because they're disagreing with you. You are toxic for literally lying and trying to shame named players. QED

The only truly toxic behaviour in this thread.. has all been you.

Your biased opinion on who's good or bad, especially when you compare yourself to them as being better, when every metric shows you're wrong, means nothing whatsoever. If anything it just makes any opinion you have worth even less (not that you've ever shown yourself to have any worthwhile opinions). And being in the top end KOTS team matters one hella lot more than being a loudmouth middling player like you.

11 hits too few in my daily cleve win 380 hits over the requirement with akizuki

Except she did better in ranked than you. Simple numbers. /also, sub 50% WR in ranked isn't "good", it's not even average.

The only single way you're correct.. is that the only you would consistently outperform another CV player is if they're less than average.. She's still a far better CV player than you, period. One or a couple games isn't statisticly relevant, nor is your biased view of how a battle went.

Except that .. like your entire claims in the original post, is entirely untrue. Also, divisioning with a CV is NOT AN EXPLOIT. How ridiculously dumb such a claim is, but about what one would expect from you.

He's the only one that even marginally agreed with you. So he's "right". Yet this thread, and all your threads is filled with experienced players of far greater skill than you telling you how wrong you are. You're beyond help.

People call you a liar because you're talking out or your behind. While this, and really any online game, will have some toxic people, making claims as you do where you claim it's worse than WoT, would make sensible people wonder how you manage to have an experience like this. Which really just leaves two options, you invite toxic behaviour or you're lying. Here's an idea for you, if you make posts, and most people disagree with you, then maybe, just maybe, you're wrong?

Erm.. but it's not how hard you've been hit, it's how hard enemies have TRIED to hit you.

Going "we all know" is a fallacy itself.

Well, if we're talking about people with the worst possible toxic behaviour in this game.. here's you.

Again, she finished to rank 1 in less than half the battles you did. She plays better in randoms. She's just a far better player than you. /and she's also not a liar like you, as everyone here that actually went and checked the numbers can tell given the claims you made in your first post //and rofl at calling divisions, something the game is designed around, an "exploit", what a massive turd of a joke ///you're continuing your massive streak of not making any threads that isn't clueless whining

Good start to that would be permabanning people who suicide to spite their teams.

Isn't the game fps locked? Not that you'd be able to see anything more than that anyhow.

It would hardly be surprising if they use these currencies as replacements for other rewards. They've already heavily nerfed rewards for ranked (at least the 5-15 rank rewards).

Hilarious. Bypassing the reality that WoW was basicly rewritten within 7-8 months of release (and long before any expansions) because of the very reason that classes, raids, dungeons and gear was an utter mess... (just like so many other massive changes to MMOs have been forced by). And you still fail to answer the actual point made, where you pretend there was no game that had done the thing WoWs have actually done, something that's.. trump level dishonest. And calling someone a "fanboi" merely for pointing out reality.. ye that's expected, with a hefty dose of projections to boot. That you block people who has real points against your random internet hateboi talk? Just something more that's entirely expected.

It has to be when they need that strawman to "argue" their case.

I understand you either didn't take part.. or didn't pay much attention during the actual beta, but the dev cycle and feature additions then were pretty obvious. As was the completion of the basic game with the starter lineup of tech trees. And ask blizzard, they've entirely rewritten WoW how many times now? Or take WoT, which is now in version 9 or 10? Which by your definitions means it's actually the tenth game in a series.. or something.. and they're still heavily reworking large parts as the game changes over time. There's just no holy script that says what sort of version numbers a dev has to use for release versions, not that you really care ofc, it's just a crap sideways insult.

Except that far back the concept of "game patches" didn't exist of course. And my point was that, they're calling the game as being released. Thus it is. Their internal numbering is entirely irrelevant. That you say you've never seen a dev do that, when this dev does it, just shows your incredible dishonesty (or amazing blindness) on the topic. /that pic is a nice point about how you're wrong though, so thanks

Except this very game was annouced as released nearly 3 years ago QED

Hey, at least his topic headline describes him.

I guess it's too much to expect you to stop spewing the absurd lie that the game is still in beta.. However, this isn't going to make selling accounts more viable. Steel isn't something you can mindlessly bot, and coal is simply another resource you'll get plenty from by natural gameplay. It's a resource you'll get far more effectively from smart gameplay. And calling it a scam.. ye, that's just more nonsense. These aren't currencies you can guy with real cash, so there's no real angle to get people to spend cash over it (beyond simply keeping people interested in the game).