AgarwaenME

Why am I surprised that he would change ship type and still find a cause to whine about it?

If your words are "XYZ exists" then it's not an opinion but a statement of fact, no matter how desperately you attempt to go the "it's just my opinion and every opinion is equally valid" nonsense. Nor are people "white knights" for asking you to provide evidence (and even opinions needs some sort of backing). Indeed, if anyone is "white knighting" in this thread, it's you being one for the OP.

Someone having a lucky streak does not make them a cheater. Nor do you provide any evidence for those you think are cheating. Not that I think you've ever seen the example you make. Nor would it make sense, why would he be that potato if he could just switch on a cheat to make every salvo as a devastating strike.

How does that in any way mean you didn't know, and couldn't demount this one particular unique upgrade? /And 25 dubloons is barely a mediocre game worth of fxp.

After 25k battles you haven't learned how demounting upgrades work? In 25k battles you couldn't manage to get even one SC with a few dubloons in it? And in 25k battles you couldn't find enough amusement to make even a tiny purchase worth it?

Do you know who else gave out coloured triangles?

My counterpoint:

Ah, I stand corrected. Well still, at worst that's one container less, compared to the 4+ you can get otherwise.

If you take it literally, every ship is. And the least of those in that regard are CVs.

At MOST you'll end up with one less container per day vs the FOUR you can get just by playing. However, with the higher point income it will be easier to get those four containers (which could easily offset the one from winning for the day) and it would be far easier to get one of the top 1k/100/10 ones too. Ie, unless you're in the "plays just enough for 4 containers but not quite enough to get into top 1000" you're likely to lose nothing, and will have a decent chance to get more by not being in the winning team.

Don't come here with your correct maths

You won't have to buy prem containers to get a prem cammo.. You will however have to buy 3 at a minimum if you want to get 3 prem cammos.

Anyone find the logic of "BBs have received so many buffs that the ships that were supposed to keep us safe from XYZ can't stay anywhere close to us anymore, so now we need to nerf the ships that now can hurt us because of the unindented consequences of nerfing ships that could hurt us!!", just ever a bit facepalm worthy?

Such raw lazy cynical biased generalizations.

I have one proper bias in this game.. against people who picks a "insert name*_1 nick This guy certainly strengthens that bias.

So you think 3 battles is some amazing outlier? And your 3 games today is suddenly your normal performance? And that 3 battles where something happened gives you a right to generalize the playerbase, of which you're on the lower half of the skill level? As I already said, you're inventing a reality where you're far better than you are, which is ruining your fun in the game because you keep believing you deserve better than you actually do.

3 battles aren't representative of all your battles.

Until you start posting pics of all the battles that contribute to your overall poor secondary stats.. why should we care that you post your cherry picked best battles ever?

Indeed. Listening to dumb people is still a dumb choice to make.

No, you simply redefine everything you do as good, even if overall you objectively don't do to well. And since you "know" you're doing the right thing, the only reason you get underwhelming results has to be somewhere else but you.

Something tells me you're not taking screenshots of games you play badly in.

So you don't think wins say anything, so why do you worry so much about not winning? As it is, his point was that you're within about 2 battles of your usual win rate, so there's nothing special about your most recent record of wins and losses. And to even get to be that close to it you would actually have to have had a fairly significant lucky streak just before this unlucky streak. /nevermind how delusional people are that they can look at their own reliably sub par performance and WR, and build a scenario where they're completely excused and it only being their "teams".

Read what you quoted.

To add to this, not playing ships where you can use the xp to progress tech trees has an implied cost added to it, but as has playing a prem where you already have a 19pt cap and thus aggregate elite xp to use in a captain for a new line added value. But as a major reduction in any such value, is the (admittedly rather few I bet) people who are at a place where credits are above any value where you ever will be struggling to buy what you want anyways.