AgarwaenME
-
Content Сount
4,811 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
13808 -
Clan
[SCRUB]
Everything posted by AgarwaenME
-
Or "it's always the same people starting every thread where they ask for unreasonable changes to favour themselves". Sorry but this is just you trying to get away from the actual arguments. (also, that something is "APPARENT" isn't much of a thing to base anything on, the earth "APPEARS" flat). And calling something that's purely opinion (that CV design is faulty) a "fact" just hammers this point home. Nor is it a fact that a CV can kill anyone they want, and quite frankly for anyone even remotely competent to make such claims tells a lot about how much they care about honesty. And cherry picking a few specific CVs against another few specific BBs as an argument? Really? Want to hear how many other scenarios where one player would basicly nearly always win in a 1v1?
-
Except that's just not the case.
-
So.. lying or merely lacking any sort of experience?
-
Pretending the only way people can disagree is if they're here to "defend" WG.. Pretending (or just being ignorant) that there's nothing he can do Pretending CAs/DDs don't get deleted even if they do what they're supposed to. Do you have any more fallacies, or is this it?
-
So, hypocrisy it is then.
-
Cool. So you'll be fine with making no t10 BB able to oneshot a T8 CA/CL then? I mean, it's the same thing and you wouldn't just be crying for your own specific situation?
-
-
At this point we're in typhoon with 2 or 3 people having finished the 30 wins (would have been more but attrition during this CW has been terrible), with a few more who should be finishing it, and a few more that might if we get a 1-2 decent sessions. If not we could easily end up with less than 7 in total for this season, and I'm not even sure if all of these have the other two (which likely is the case for a lot of those people currently sitting in typhoon).
-
Then why aren't the top teams doing this? It's a trick that can work, until people learn to spot them and the simple things needed to control them.
-
Besides summer and outside factors. As others here have mentioned, the whole alpha/bravo system just messed this season up entirely. Delaying the time needed to get storm/typhoon fully populated, meaning many who could contend for the stalingrad flag just gave up (or even some people in my clan who just about is starting to have people finish the 30 wins, have people who gave up on it weeks ago, and as a clan that just barely sniffed at purple last season, we struggle just to stay in typhoon, yet we win against the same, lose against the same, and play even against the same clans). Getting a top10 clan in 3 battles within 10 just makes the efforts against even level clans (we barely get anything lower ever) moot, especially when they're in a bravo team that takes 20+ points away. I don't mind at all that hurricane is a bit more high end than it was, but at the moment the entire league is shifted one tier down making for a very frustrating time.
-
Operation "Killer Whale" is waste of time
AgarwaenME replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion
That's what she said. -
Probably because they tried it in WoT, and it failed spectacularly.
-
Has team damage gone down since the recent change?
AgarwaenME replied to philjd's topic in General Discussion
Not sure about the amount of team damage, but subjectively I would agree. The amount of people whining "not my fault" and blaming others for their own blindness has increased though -
so tell me, should i stop playing yamato. is that the message you are sending us devs
AgarwaenME replied to Rage_Oddball's topic in General Discussion
Back in CBT yes, and the nerf only halfway offset a buff that made BBs turn on a dime. The yamato has had one actual nerf since beta, which was a nerf to reduce its zombie heal to manageable levels. -
That's not what an ad hominem is. In fact, calling people who simply say "if you play better you get more credits", something which is factually true, elitists is an ad hominem.
-
Clans are bought with real money, so it would be pretty strange to let someone else just take it away from you.
-
Err.. your speed in editing isn't what decide if the edit tag is shown (there's a box you chose to tick for that). And while I know for a fact you took longer (as it took longer for me to have read it and replied), there's also a lot more people here that read it in that "tiny" time, and replied.. and you even replied to them before editing that post, leaving a rather large amount of posts to somehow having to have been written in 30 seconds. But then I actually read it, and noticed when you did edit it, making such weak lies just put your overall attitude in the troll bin.
-
Except they didn't.. the CBT aim mod was allowed for a while as they gathered information (and looked at ways to stop mods from accessing the bit of code in the actual client that it used, which was just as big an issue as the legality of the mod). And during the time it was freely allowed the only real thing it did was increase toxicity in chats, with people have even less self control in who they accused of cheating, no matter if they used it or not (this toxicity increased when it became public knowledge, not when it actually started to get used, much like how people that did not use it would get such accusations thrown at them with regularity, just like today). And when they announced it would be dissallowed, it was announced with fairly little fanfaire. Though it amused me quite a bit to have people confuse several minor patches just prior to that larger patch, filling chat with "omg I can see the aim mod is gone!!" (when it worked just as "well" as it ever did). Besides that, any competent player will frequently fire anything but where this would tell you to aim, making it a detriment for somewhat competent players more than anything else. Landing shots in this game just isn't that hard.
-
30% WR player hitting only dev strikes? People cheating? What more do you need? /and no, your post wasn't edited 30 secs within being posted.
-
Or you entirely overestimate how much they healed, and you fail to realise how some CLs have very effective heals, and thus cheat claims is born.
-
1) Simply wrong. CVs risk their planes when they attack, this would be like you having a chance for your guns blowing up when you fire them, so this very much is a case of risk vs reward as CVs have to adjust for the risk of losing the ability to attack vs the importance of attacking a given target. 2) Just wrong, Just repeating a meme people love to repeat. 3) 3 torp squads is limited to two carriers in the entire game (and they have lower numbers for each squad). And even then there's LOADS you can do, and even more you should have done from the start of the game. Ie, your premises are entirely wrong, and unsurprisingly your suggestions are pointless. (even accounting for the massive overhaul that likely are entirely incompatible). Though to make a point on your first suggestion. Since it's so obviously clear from it you really have no clue. CVs already should be played as close to the enemy as possible to shorten flight times and turnaround and thus getting to attack more, so this really is entirely a wasted suggestion. (and the ranges planes had outstrips anything you see in this game by 100x or more, so even looking for reality to find some excuse to nerf is just silly).
-
I'm just laughing. And awaiting you trying CVs and CA/CLs only to find out there's something about them that makes the game entirely destroyed. That you call something "indefensible" when you can't write one line without massive hyperbole just makes such claims entirely without power. /and if you think BBs should hit all shots they fire, then you're crazy. They're already dominating both CAs and DDs in damage done, and such a suggestion would quadruple their damage.
-
Again, and I wonder how many times I have to explain this to you.. Calling something an "opinion" just because you don't have, and don't want to, provide evidence for factual claims made, is just nonsense. And it's particularly dishonest and nonsensical after you just went and edited the post you made these claims in.
-
Or how about you the example you just quoted and understand that no matter how much you call it "opinion" they're still statements of facts. And that this weak as poop attempt to use the "just my opinion you can't say I'm wrong", isn't going to fly.
-
Again, you pretend that statements of facts are opinion. They're not. Going "2+2=5 and since that's my OPINION you can't say I'm wrong and I need not prove this in any way" is just nonsense. And you yourself bash on people who respond to you objectively, and then you try to play the self victimisation card by pretending people are bashing you. So hop along and go read up on the word "hypocrisy".
