AgarwaenME

Because that's not proof of WG intentionally making them better because OMG RUSSIA OMG BESTEST!!

The point is, even if they on average would be better, that's no "proof" of russian bias. Nor is spouting that old drivel over and over again going to be productive.

No, he skews things to imply something when there's no real reason to believe them. As for insults, you need to stop cherry picking who you want to pick at for "insults".

Grow up. Learn what bias actually is, and understand how it's your anti WG/russian bias that's actually the issue.

Snipped a collection of fallacies of all sorts.. But since you've collected the data from 100k games, feel free to provide that data. Again, it makes no sense whatsoever to rig some games to be boring. btw, if you're so amazing, why isn't that showing in your performance?

In that case it's a self defeating proposition. You're suggesting that they on purpose would make some battles more boring.

Except that's simply not true. But keep on dreaming.

It's even worse though, His argument is along the lines of "people can drown in water, so all water is lethally dangerous".

Snipped the rest of the subjective guesswork, begging of questions, what ifs, "it's possible so it's true" and other silliness because it's you repeating the same fallacies over and over. No, the cammo shows that there's... cammo in the game that gives you benefits. Your claim that this proves something is just laughable, as IF they wanted to, they could do that no matter if that cammo exists or not. Thus that cammo proves nothing. "There's code in the game that controls dispersion" is in no way the same as "there's code in the game that makes me miss because WG hates me". In the end, you have nothing but a vague idea that the game tries to stop your amazing skill from shining through because you're so amazingly awesome that you'd win 99% of the time if they didn't. This is just your ego running away with you (and your signature shows that to everyone).

just to reply to this drek.. "bad" 1. The player base is far more than concurrent players on the server. And to compare the first week or two when a lot of people were just trying it, or were more actively playing before settling into a more normal activity level is just pure dishonesty. If anything it's been remarkably steady with the obvious ups and downs to to holidays, weekends and the like. 2. See above. Also I see "new" players all the time. Without actual numbers from WG though, neither I nor you can make a claim about this. Could they work to attract more? Certainly, but this game has a more narrow appeal than other games. 3. They're already unified enough for me, and while I wouldn't mind having gold shared too (though there's the issue with some wot players with a huge amount of it from non-paid sources) I'm entirely against shared free xp. I've no need to see people jumping right into high tiers with hundreds of thousands of free xp from wot, and the game wouldn't in any way be better for it. 4. This is just a silly claim. If anything wows is far more forgiving than wot, with lower tier play being much more worthwhile and far lower differences in tier to tier performance for most ships.Though a respecc option for credits (and a less punishing retrain for higher level captains) should be introduced, comparing it to wot is silly. 5. Hardly, even if some are borderline, they don't in any way dominate gameplay (numbers maybe particularly at t8, but not performance). 6. As if they couldn't make clan wars that didn't give away gold? Silly silly silly attempt to twist something into WG being greedy. Sure bring on clan wars, but you can easily do that without gold being an issue at all. 7. Stupid attempt to willify WG. In reality it's OP (and similar peoples) actual bias shining through. Still it's amazingly hilarious that someone who spent ages arguing that things should be nerfed (always the things he didn't play of course, and pretty much always going through ridiculous hoops and claims of "but but realism" while ignoring far more pressing issues if realism actually was a goal), only to then see the unintended consequences (which we warned him about) pretend he had foresight.

And what's the point in owning the skies? Where's the fun in fighter vs fighter combat in this game? None that's what.

Thanks for providing this. If nothing else it's a clear testament to how people actually have no idea about what actually goes on, instead relying on their feelings and arrogance to fuel their opinions.

Learn how arguments are formed, what facts are, and what ad hominems are. The silliness in you talking about others reading levels, when you ignore any and all actual arguments.. is just sad actually..

That's just stupid in every possible way. By that definition any game where you can do anything to give yourself some advantage is rigged, which leaves very few online games as "non-rigged". But then that's not what that word mean. And no, you can't twist reality to where you can make an assertion without evidence, and then pretend that any claim is as likely as the nul hypothesis.

Again, what part of "you can't disprove me so I'm right when I make an assertion based on my feelings, opinion and biased point of view" is a usable argument? Here's a hint, none at all. And you claim you've lose 8% WR since the patch? That's just an absurd and entirely untrue claim. Your issue is that you play badly, so you get bad results, but in your arrogance you think you're so amazing that you can "know" based just on your own ideas that there's been undocumented changes done, even if actual server statistics shows nothing of the sort.

Whenever I rolled 20 it was so obviously easy to roll that 20, and when I rolled 1 .. I guess the dice was being rigged. Just listen to yourself, it's an absurdity.

Then do so. Numbers. Statistics. Go on.

*yawn* No, people just want an end to "omg I just had a game where XYZ happened/didn't happen so OMG WHAT HAPPEN!?!?! WHY WG NERF/BUFF OMG!! I can ttly see it because.. just because!!!" So stop trying to dismiss people actually asking for real data so you can make baseless claims as if they're fact.

No it is NOT the same thing. Ignoring something that's asserted without evidence is the obvious choice, unless you have a personal reason to make yourself still believe it. That something "could" be true is no reason to believe that it is, or that say it's just as likely as not.

You haven't tested anything at all. Until you provide actual numbers, don't ask if others have done it. Anyones inability to disprove an unproven claim doesn't make that claim true. You say that others argue like a child, when you seem to lack the simplest basics of how evidence works. Then you finish off with more silly ad hominems that does nothing but show us all how amazingly biased you are.

Again, entirely twisted and ridiculous. YOU are making a claim. So YOU have the burden of proof. No proof means any claim is worthless from the get go. You and your "friends" have an opinion that is popular amongst you, which is a popular opinion for you. And you skew everything you see to fit it. These are attitudes and ideas that have no merit in a forum where we try to have serious discussions, and in the interest of keeping focus on actual issues it's worth it to point out how deluded these claims are.

But then even retraining in a premium ship is going to cost you quite a bit of progress on that captain (and it's next to impossible even then at the highest levels of captains). And as others have said, CVs "needs" at least a few items upgraded to make them less terrible (particularly fighters), and some BBs have a lot to gain from at least the first hull upgrade. Additionally there's some DDs who basicly don't play as they should before they have their "best" torpedo. So.. just don't spend your small stock on free xp to get to a ship quickly, as you'll do better just finishing that ship normally and then more quickly get the next one into a decent state.

Then until you DO prove them, stop claiming you know. Does it mean you can or can't? No, but until you do, your claims have no value whatsoever. You use fallacy after fallacy, as if "you having played thousands of hours" even makes you an authority, when such claims even from an authority would be worthless without actual evidence. So a full paragraph of such utter toss isn't going to help you. And no, gravity is nothing like this as we can MEASURE it and find it to be there, and consistent. You're providing nothing at all in that regard. And you even go as far as the utter stupidity that is asking someone to disprove your claim, as if that in any way proves anything. A better analogy would be homeopathy, and you views are like people that believe in that.

That's 100% twisted, again as usual for you. What you described IS POPULAR OPINION, and nothing more. "Seeing" patterns and then being unable to prove it, while still claiming they really are there, is delusion. And not only will that not make you ahead of the pack, it will do the exact opposite.