Benser33

It's about time you brought Loop up to modern standards.

Account deletion can only be reverted within 45 days of initiating the deletion and is done manually by logging in to your account and selecting Restore Account. If you can no longer log in, then the deletion has been completed and cannot be reverted. The deletion is permanent to comply with GDPR regulations.

They were renamed to Unique Upgrades prior to even being released. https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/game-updates/update-076-night-battle/#mods-x

Check if you can log in to the PT domain here https://pt.worldofwarships.ru/id/signin/

The ice sure is thin this winter.

Not yet, but when they do this unique upgrade thing they announced it will be.

Just buy it back from the armory, comrade. Only 12k RP each.

I have to say for starters that I really appreciate the devblog posts and the amount of exposure you grant to the community for upcoming changes, I have not seen many other games who are so open-ended about the games development and make such frequent attempts to articulate even some of the earlier development concepts. I wish more devs did this and I truly do appreciate the time, effort and transparency. But seriously, whose idea was this and what is wrong with that person? It's not even about players not wanting the game to be monetized, thats a necessity. It's not about players being against new systems for the game, players enjoy choice and progression. It shouldn't even be about how you prioritise your resources, because players should realise that map designers and artists game balance devs are not the same guys who work on the low level code where many bugs exist. It's about this specific idea of reducing everyones game quality by multiple orders by A) making players feel like they have to grind and regrind content to be relevant to B) gain a statistical or tactical advantage over other players which is gated behind a huge amount of time and progress. When you release more details about this system it had better be about balancing unique upgrades and creating a more visually pleasant method of distribution because if the upgrades cost research points and the revamped upgrades are better than anything else available then you have failed us all.

Wait for more details. The CV unique upgrades have been due for a rework for some time and your existing upgrade would be changed.

I cant wait to add finishing my remaining lego mods before March to the list of things to grind right now.

Please tell the people in charge to stop. We did not want NTC the first time, you cannot just revamp unique upgrades into your NTC concept upgrades and add them as rewards for RB and think that we are too stupid to see past that. Just fix the current lego mods and add new ones, stop trying to make people regrind lines over and over AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.

I would like to participate.

As people above have mentioned, all of the ships that are freely available from the Gorizia enabled chain are tier 6 standard ships (Furious, Izmail, Guepard and Trento) which will skip you to tier 6 of the 4 newest ships lines. If you own these ships already you will receive their full credit value in compensation. Since the awarded ships are fully researched, if your Guepard or Trento are not fully researched yet you might unlock the missing modules as well. To grind the ships you first require the tier 7 premium cruiser Gorizia, which you can either buy in the shop or earn from Directive 3.

The question is, what capabilities of a radar qualify it to be present as a surveillance radar ingame? A type 291 aerial warning radar does not qualify, it's not designed to detect surface ships. A type 285 fire control direction radar does not qualify, it is designed to track a target and assist in fire control, not for initial detection of a ship. A type 268 navigational radar does not qualify, this X-band radar is capable of detecting a ship but with no where near enough precision to provide the necessary information, such as the difference between one large target or two smaller targets who are close together. The Surveillance Radar consumable ingame is not particularly realistic, but the capacity of a ship to use it ingame is not quite so arbritrary as whether it had any sort of radar equipment at all. Ships that have radar ingame typically had a comparable high resolution, long range, surface warning/surface search radar set available to them. Such as the British Type 281, or the American SPS-10. That said, it still does not always make sense. And this brings us back to Gearing. The Gearing class was fitted with SPS-10 radars, but that was in the early 1960s and included changes such as the replacement of their 2x5 torpedo launchers with 2x3 as well as the removal of one of her main guns. So, no, I personally do not see how the Gearing of 1942 should have the radar consumable.

The armory has a category for buying containers, you should get a splash screen offering 2 when you first check that category.

ayy lmao

It's because the containers for dubloons are marked as having less of a discount. You are not being charged more, you are receiving less of a discount. If you don't want to pay that dubloon price why do you not get a refund on the dubloons and then buy the containers directly? Your question is not really about the legality of it, it's more the question of why is the discount lower when spending dubloons then when paying for it yourself. And the answer to that is most probably just because WG wants to incentivise people with dubloons to put more real money into the game rather than spending the virtual currency they already have that WG have already made their money on. It's all just marketing.

I personally would recommend Radar at Sea by Derek Howse, or Norman Friedmans Naval Radar for a more wide ranging view that covers more than just the US and UK developments, including Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia. But what is your point?

The dubloons containers in the armory do say they are -10% off not -25% off like the ones you can buy directly with cash from the premium shop or the ingame container screen. This is likely because WG prefers to drain more of the dubloons that people have ingame that theyve gained from compensation and rewards and such...

Yes? Most of the cruisers have radar ingame too. Not all naval radar is capable of surface search. The majority of radar sets aboard RN vessels during WW2 provided aerial early warning. The earliest RN surface search set was the Type 79B, which was an aerial early warning set with a range of 170km and up to 20,000ft when detecting aircraft, but was also capable of surface search capability up to a range of 3-11km, a feature the original Type 79Y did not have. This became the Type 281/B radar which first showed up on HMS Dido and had a surface search range of 22km. 60 sets were produced for various cruisers. Neither of these surface search capable radar sets were installed on any of the RNs DDs during WW2, and none of them, including Daring, ever received such a set.

I'll believe it when I see it.

Some of these seem excessive, they may have been datamined from pts and are not final?

Make sure that there are no Win10/Graphics updates that need to be applied and restart your machine to be sure. If it still will not cooperate, find end the Wargaming.net Game Center process in task manager and then go to the installation directory (fastest way is to just right click the desktop/start menu shortcut and Open File Location) and run setup.exe to do a reinstall of the launcher. This lets you reinstall the launcher without having to reinstall all of the games.

The 18th of October 2018 was longer ago than the 19th of November 2018. But Leone is second longest, at least. The only other ship announced in 2018 that has not yet arrived. Unlike Indomitable, however, Leone has not had any updates since the 25th of February this year.

True, but I would not consider an SG radar as being the sort of equipment you would attribute to surveillance radar ingame, that is more like having a minimap. Otherwise you could justify almost any vessel as having radar.