Anthoniusii

It the yellow color areas behind the dechhouse. In option 1 it covers a part of the hull and part of central 2ndary tower basis. In otion 2 the area of option 1 has more chaki color and now has a smaller yellow area in the hull torwards to it end and hald of tower 3 basis.

I am trying 2 years with Veteran's containers to get KIDD with no success. Instead in 2 years after opening douzens of Veteran's containers i had Duca DAosta and recently Printz Eugen. I have Hill tier 5 , Monaghnan tier 6 and Black. From my little expirience with DDs because i play mostly BBs Black players are bad as players and there is nothing wrong with the ship its self. I have notticed that in ranked battles players still think that play CO OP ones and actually expose their DDs to enemy radars and recieve massive fire. So its up to the players and not the ship to blame.

The catch when you play -for example CO OP battles- in maps with multiple bases is to LET BOTS enter the bases first and then shoot them. Caping a base gives you one (1) ribbon but shooting an enemy ship trying to vcap a base and you and your allies ARE OUTSIDE the base and shoot it may give you from 3 to 10 defend ribbons.

I am caming back with HIZEN issues. WG offered us in the end of the shipyard a different ship that shown us to invest our real money in doublons for the -atleast- last stages of building it. Instead of 30 sec per salvo we got an outrageus 37 secs per salvo and with the upgrade 33.5 secs per salvo. The ship without having Lion's abillity in restoring hit points has 4 repair parties instead of 5. WG stuff were such selfish that instead of fixing HIZEN offered us IWAMI and now almost none plays a ship that payed for it. Daisen is a hybrid between IWAMI and AMAGI but unless WG wont fix HIZEN my trust on what WG "offers" wont restore. Even now that it requires only 2500 doublons via Premium Battle Pass last reward. Once again. Dear WG developers FIX THAT DAMN HIZEN. Just reduse the loading time of the main guns to33 (with upgrade 30 secs) per salvo , give HIZEN Izumo's ammunition since it uses the same guns and add a damn single more repair party. Untill then me and those that my opinion counts wont spend a single cent in the game. EVER!!

Ιn super tests (like they gave us the DD latest line to test) Hizen was completly different. It had 30 secs main gun loading time and 4 (5 with captain skill)repair parties.

You are right ..Sespite i never bought anything in WoT i did that mistake in WoWs. You have a point here.

Its not a joke i speak from expirience. If you see my symbol is a modder's symbol for this game. I was a modder /skinner for WoT fpr more than 6 years the times that you could make models simply with Milkshape... and later I was one of the best skinners. Now days all model moders coppy the War Thunder models and put them in WoT....that became a 100% fiction game ... As you can see when I say something it has some real basis. WoWs unfortunatly is heading to the WoT's direction feeding the competition instead of gaining new hardcore players. I left WoT in pastch 0.9.9 just before it has its 1.0 release because of their despicable policy over their clients. I hope WoWs dev team wont fall with them . My critisism is because i still like this game and I want to see it getting on for years and not have the faight of WoT.

Yes because i played less that 10 battles with Hizen. I guess that was my problem from the start , begining with WoT more than 10 years ago. When we pointed out an issue they mocked us but a year later they made that step taking the credits for them. "You need high quality and dirty/rusted textures for the tanks " WG = We do not need such textures, a year later "we announce high quality textures full of use damage". "Your Type-59 is not a tier 7 because its a clone of a tier 9 tank" WG = That is wrong. Two years later type 59 becomes tier 8 ! I feel sorry the WoWs team follows the same mistakes WoT team made and actually forced the best players to turn to War Thunder. I hope WoWs team wont make the same mistake because now War Thunder started to have ships as well.

The title says it all. IS THERE any chance?

Even the fact you are right. The ship as WG delivered is useless. I recomended those changes multiple times. Tell me how many Hizens have you saw in Ranked Battles or even in Custom ones?

Does this count? Brawl battle. Nottice the word DEFEAT!!!!!! That defeat will be counted in my record and some will accuse me as a bad player.

Thank you my friend.

Will the Brisbane be a ship for coal or not?

I will sent you the original textures, the colorschemes to follow your example and few pictures of what area i need to replace the color and what actually is replaced. I will load my curent update now and we can include the change to the next one. THANK YOU AGAIN for your interest to help me my friend.

Thank I tried your method but it gives me wrong color changes.

Question: I want to replace the wrong brown color of Renown 1944 with the sand brown that most Bristish ships use like the Renown 1945 here: The 1st uses colorScheme renown_prem and the other colorSchemeUKP41 In Renaown 1945 (2nd pic) the sand area is green (yellow actually) in the Renown 1944 the brown area is blue. According to this : I copied the color values that refer to yellow from colorSchemeUKP41 to the line that refers to blue in to colorScheme renown_prem but the result is the change of color of different areas. What am I doing wrong?

Take a look on the yellow highlighted boxes. I gave my Prinz Eugen campain the consealment skill but when i put the cursor on the ship's icon i have the primitive values but on the side the new values. In other ships i made that comparisson the values in both cases are the same. Is it a bug? Which value is valid?

Unforthunatly the discount coupon does not apply today. In fact such intense misions have two negative issues : 1: Force children to "steal" their parents credit cards info to buy doublons 2: Or make players play in-stopable for meny hours expossing their health to dangers like Epilepsy crisis because there IS NO WARNING fron the PART of WG like in other games that warn for such dangers: AN EXAMPLE: AS you can understand such intensive misions that push players in limited timeframes are ilegal in EU game ToS. PS: If WG would follow that rule : The discount coupon would not existed or would have a triple time of being available. WG seams notto care musch for the health of its clients but how fast it will gather real money now with the Ucrain-Russian war.

I am confused. The 1st mision gives 110 tokens. Are the rest of misions give less tokens than the 1st one? If not there are 9 misions that with an average of 80 tokens per mision x 9 misions = 720 tokens and we can buy the Brisbane with its full price of 700 tokens. Do I make a mistake anywhere. Can someone that already unlocked misions 2-5 confirm that each mision gives atleas a total of 80 tokens?

Great reward because it gives you the chance to activate 2 premium Battle Pass ONLY IF THERE ARE ships that worth the price and effort. I agree. I hope I will get one of these some day.

After almost a year that a Veteran's Box that you get with Community tokens and U had my 1st ship drop Duca D'Aosta few minutes ago and after several boxes with minor rewards I had my 2nd Ship Prinz Eugen and I was lucky enough to use it in Ranked battle with a very good team and a victory.

This was my best Ranked battle yesterday.

WOWSCARNIVAL2023 From today broadcast.

The problem lies in WG's fictioal over-penetration penalty on Destroyers by Battleships to give Destroyer players more fun removing the fun from players that play Battleships. I explain. In a Battleship direct hit on another BB the damage may be from 1250 to 12000 (citadel hits)with most of them their average damage that is more or less arround 4k damage on the target. So a DD with a 11k hit points wiould need 4 direct hits from a Battlehip to be sinked. Here comes WG with the fictional over penetration issue. A Battlehsip hit has more than 50% pernalty but physics and shipyard experts tell us other wise. I am in direct contact with a ship designer and he explained that over penetration can not apllied in small ships. The reason is quite simple. The smaller the ship the lass place to pack , engines, cables, electonics, acomodation and weapons and ammunition. So there is NO EMPTY SPACE in small ships to have over penetration because a shell will 100% hit something in its way through the ship's hull. That created a travesty in game. A 100 m long DD is invisible in distances more than 5 kms and a Battleships salvo of 9 direct hits does not quarantee that DD will be sunk. So knowing that DD players attack directly to BBs knowing that they will sutvive anyway and launch 6 to 12 torpedos that brings a BB to the botom of the sea!!! An other travesty is the time that topredos that weight several tones reload in almost same time as BBs main guns!!! That is why DD players do not pay attention to safety. With the DD survival travesty and the number of rocks and islands in every map this game is closer to World of Tanks rather to any naval game. The only difference is that instead of grass we have water.

You simply did nor make attention to my 1st line. Never mind since the issue os solved.