Anthoniusii

Question: Can a historical skin become unique cammo for a ship? For example this: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=http://i.imgur.com/7JokD9X.png&key=3d950c29cd3db9469293fdb4f991eb806306c2ee2a1c67cc06b039b5c7aec42f , The problem with skins is that ships of same nation share common parts like weapons and others. When you use a skin part of it apears in other ships of the same nation as well. What if instaed of the strange looking camos real historical skins could be applied as cammos as well? To replace atleast the 3 basic cammos we all use?

My PC is quite old. Windows 7x64 Ultimate Intel Core Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33Ghz 4.0G RAM Nvidia Geforce GTX 660 2G Dx 11 The game performance with DX 11 usage "returned" to the previus patches problems that parts of the ships models delayed to load in game, cammos delay to load in game, battle starts with 200-300 ping for atleast 15-20 secs, and zoom in/zoom out in aiming cause freeze of the game for 5-10 secs, I play many "heavy" games in DX11 but i have not serius problems. EDIT: Same problems remain with DX9 . Conclusion: Its not always the graphics that ruin the game but something else too. Too heavy terain..Where is Ocean btw? Buged aiming. NVIDIA cards have not proper lods procesing.

Patch 0.6.9.1 Press the repair consumable (R) button and NO repair at all! Happened twice today. Unless something changed with that consumable (only repairs one of many damages now).

Had the same issues my self.

I had the game freezing durring the Operation Newport. Everytime a new stage of battle is announced the game has more and more freezes!The worst freezes come in the final stage of the operation!!! Also in one case instead of freezing the game disconected and after new connection it "refused" ti load and the game started to use my PC's entire resources (CPU and RAM/99%)!

When in WoT WG introduced British tanks those were much inferior to most of other tanks despite the fact that most Br tanks were battle proven and their opponets were simply bleuprints. When WG introdused BN cruisers few of us protested why in the line there was no heavy cruiser (even temporarily) like in the rest of cruiser lines. My surprice was even bigger when i saw the LEANDER cruiser in tier 6 with 13km gun range that was equal to tier 3 of the cruisers of that time in game!!!! Some will still mock me about a WG bias but numbers are telling the truth: French TIER 4 light crusier with 15km gun range!!!! British TIER 6 light cruiser with 13km gun range! Since day one i said that LEANDER should have atleast 15 gun range and BE TIER 5 same as Konigsburg, But few started to mock. For those just read NUMBERS!!!!!!! WG developers stop creating diferent standards from patch to patch without renew the old standards!! Make LEANDER the cruiser it was and give it its right place in game!

I agree. But WG still publishes videos of "Frigates" as naval legends or Cruisers that never shot a single shell to other ships. This ship deserves a video because still stands after 110 years! Fought in four wars never defeated and won two naval battles against the entire Turkish Navy and its coastal gun batteries by its own! But I forgot...Turkish customers would not like such a video! As for the ship...When heavy ships of Italy will be in game Piza class can not be out of the line. Not to mention Adrias Destroyer that cut of it bow from a mine and sailed from Aegean to Alexandreia making the bigest naval legend of its kind and forced the Allied Navy to pay honor to the ship and its crew while entering Alexandreia's port! No other ship sailed bigest distance being half! Russians forget that Greece's participation to war saved them by postponed Barbarossa campaign by 6 months. Its funny that they never honor Greeks!

It seams so far that the style of French cruisers suit better my game style. I said many times that LEANDER with 12.2km gun range should be tier 5 and not tier 6 and now that a tier 4 French Cruiser has 15km gun range I find my self right. In any case in this battle i was very lucky and managed to survive 6 opponets while time was running against me. Its frustrating when players have even batter performance but their team tactics lead them to defeats. This time I was just lucky.

No they should not. But a game that relies on rules (when ever its a table game or a battle simulator/arcade one) those must never change and follow standard principals. Example 1: How is possible 8 inch guns of same tier cruisers to have LESS range than 6 inch ones? Simple physics. Example 2: Why all but one Cruiser lines have a mix of light and heavy ships? Example 3: How equal calliber and barrel legth guns have so diferent range? Some will same "game play reasons". Great,,I would agree if WG would not change its own rules witout adapting old ones all the time. Exocet mentioned my posts about British tanks. He forgot to mention though that after WoT patch 0.7.1 (when Type 59 tank introdused in game with totaly unballanced statistics) and when French OP tanks emerged WG needed 2 whole years to admit it did it wrong. WG WoWs should learn from those lessons and not simply repeat them. Lets say I am a crazy guy that seeks for attention as you say. What are you the [edited] of WG that stands for free and defend anything it makes no matter is wrong or right? All of us have a playgame style and some ships fit more or less to that. That is not the case in my post. The idea is that ships must have same scale abillities in each tier and each class and rely on players abillities. Some ships will have better torpedo range but other will have faster torpedos. Some will have long range heavy calliber , low rate of fire guns and others will have faster guns but with less range because of their calliber. Game rules as simple as that. US BBs have stronger armor but Jap are more aggile... But remember that Tier 8 Amagi has 19km gun range when the tier 8 US BB has 23kms PLUS an upgrade that adds 10% more range! Both ships use similar guns. Lets supose we forget the US upgrade module. Wouldn't be fair for Amagi players have atleast slightly better gun range that they have with FUSO that is tier 6? In every ship line there are "diamonds"...Every line has atleast two of them. But there are some realy big mistakes. WG in WoT had diferent teams that designed tanks and added stats. When British tanks introdused none of the previus rules about gun calliber, size of turret and hull and age of gun was valid for them! We must not let this happen to this game also. We all seek for pleasure and exitment, But most of all "worthy opponets" to intrique us and not OP ships that do the job for players sake. [edited]

Too bad when British Navy designed that ship line did not cosult WG nore you 70 years ago! That argument would be hilarius but worth mention it in jokes in middle '40s!

So you are telling me that in your opinion LEANDER must NOT be a cruiser but a larger Destroyer because simply you like to hide in smoke. For historical info: All ships no matter class could use smoke cover! Even Bismarck used it once and many BN battlehips used it in the Battle of Mediteranean against German Stukas (still they had 30 casualties). So if you like a destroyer play with a destroyer. Players like me when they chose a cruiser to play they expect the ship to behave like one. After all many imaginary USSR cruisers ingame use smoke and STILL have top notch gun range and i haven't see anyone to complain about that! True...Now MENTION the tier of each ship! Equal ships should be in equal position and let the commander's skills determine their performance.

Both are light cruisers. Both were real. Both have no armor at all. Both have 8 same caliber guns. Both have torpedos, Both can have airplane, Now despite their diferences (smoke or range plane) can you tell me what someone reads the numbers can tell wich ship is superior? The main issue here is not the LEANDER'S statistics but the place it has in game (tier 6) when it should be atleast tier 5 same as Konigsburg,

Give LEANDER 15 or 16 km gun range and remove smoke...Konigsburg has nothing also but still has 3km gun range better than LEANDER and its tier 5! I let numbers to speak not my personal attitude against Wg or anything else. Leander with smoke or with range finder plane and 14 kms gun range could be easily placed in tier 5. Not to mention USSR imaginary tier 6 cruiser !! LET NUMBER SPEAK.

LEANDER is also tier 6 but has 13km gun range!

When i told i was lucky i ment it. First of all half of them had half their lives and only one Friant that was my 2nd kill (1st of the last 6) had full life points. It was a matter of stradegy error by enemies. 1st i was on constant manuevres and 2nd when they apeared in teams of 2 or 3 ships i always consintraded on the one with the less life because a ship with 1 hit point can still shot you. Their mistake was that they came in waves and seamed to have a competition of who will destroy the easy victim (i had also less than half life). When i say LEANDER was biased by WG some mocked me. Now see and compare basic stats of a tier 4 ship and a tier 6 one of same class (light cruisers). Tier 4 light cruiser: Tier 6 light cruiser that magicaly is inferior to tier 4!

Only yesterday i encountered Hood in a custom battle with tier 7 to tier 9 ships. The player had it for testing as he claimed. How can we test Hood also?

I saw a player yesterday with Hood saying that he was testing it.!!! In a custom battle.

I was the last ship with 6 opponets and won! But i can not find any last game folder like in World of Tanks to restore and upload the video. Is there any way?

Why buy D'Agosta when new tier 6 French CL has 15km gun range? I see no clear advandage to give money for such a ship exept to train Italian commanders. Aoba is the bigest misforthuned. Why ? Because WG magicaly redused 8 inch gun range against 6 inch guns!!! That magic i must confess!

Does the mod includes the unique cammos for german ships ? IN the pictures writes work in progress.

In the previus patch we could replace the arpeggio voices with other languages with english in default with Settings/Audio/Voiceover modification with English/Standard for example. In the latest patch that can not be done. I have made all available language compilations, I even renamed the Arpeggio folder in res/audio file, deleted it or copied EnglishUS and named it Arpeggio. Still instead of english i continue to hear those aufull Arp voices. Am I doing something wrong or in this patch those voices are BUGED?

Its not hijacking at all. In a forum we ask for solutions. When the official dev team is un able to provide solutions then players must share knowlege to allow fixes. I will copy this solution to the mod that changes Arp ships skins to real ones too to help more people.

Do you inteand to create a Myoko class Cruiser skin also in the future? Your Takao skin (with few adjustments) fited perfectly to my Arp Takao! I would like such a great skin for my Arp Myoko too!

That alone did not work for me. I followed your advice but Arp voices were still there! So after your step i renamed Arpeggio folders in the res/audio/ arpeggio into something else and also in to res/banks arpeggio in to something else too. The two steps combined allowed the game to return to US English and finally to have my "realistic" Takao enjoyed! Thank you for your help. +rep for you.