Minuz1

Now you know what you do if you have a spare engine from a clemson destroyer and don't have a hull to fit it into. You put it in a Colorado battleship 27k hp lol. The colorado isn't bad, it's just boring, it's slow.

It's overpenetration, that's exactly what is supposed to happend. Minimal damage since the shell doesn't explode.

The current mechanic of CV potentially having huge impacts on the WR% of the games they are in I would like to propose a change in gameplay mechanics. a) planes will no longer spot torpedos launched from surface ships, or atleast when they move out of range the torpedoes will disappear again. b) increase the range of the hydroscope on cruisers, so they become better at protecting their fleets (and gives them a more variable gameplay) c) increase the XP given for shooting down planes(reduce the amount of xp for kiling the CV by some/all of that amount) Please note, that I have no interest in changing visual asthetics of the game, flags and other things that are easily sorted by mods, gameplay mechanics and balance only, please.

The story about the USS William D. Porter

I kindly ask you to refrain talking about other subjects then gameplay balancing, visual asthetics aren't a part of this topic. Just download a mod and be happy

You are absolutly right, WW2 cruiser are not the ships that were famous for having hydroacoustic gear, those were destroyers which hunted down Submarines.Well since WG decided they didn't want submarines, but instead put jetskies with cloaking devices into the game, I thought about a way to improve the gameplay itself, instead of focusing on realism.

Same here, frequent almost like micro stutters, while having 60 ms and 70 fps.