mr3awsome

Because you didn't win. If you don't win you lose a star. In a draw, both teams don't win. So everyone loses a star.

The Battles are tier IX material, so I wouldn't say that. And the Weapons will work. But for the non-believers, the Gael/Gallant class is likely to be an alternative, much like the JagdPanther II is to the Ferdinand.

No, the Sovetsky Soyuz were the only ones whose construction were started. There are several projects that fit in the tier gap.

It has a 238mm belt, and they weren't actually finished.

You say that, but the Weapon class (with 4" guns) is definitely tier VIII material.

There is some method behind wing turrets. 50% more forward firepower does have some advantages.

I guess it was planned for a long time, as in game, the "Number of ships in class" has always been 14: The 4 Ersatz Gazelles of the 1914-15 Programme from before the war and the 10 Coln(ii) class ships of the War Programme(s?)

Unfortunately that was only achieved on overload power. Fortunately the speed boost consumable is a thing

I think Moltke was mentioned for the German premium. Beyond that, I don't know.

In theory, faster projectiles need thicker walls to keep them together under the stronger forces they endure, meaning less room for explosive.

If Molotov is anything to go off of, the Italians won't have any issues with dispersion.

She does as of the latest patch. 32 knots is a likely bet for Hood.

You don't get to go round the exhibit first, its before the entrance.

The Americans thought her as revolutionary as Dreadnought.

No, they produced one relatively small thing in the corner of the atrium of the exhibition.

VC381, on 01 June 2016 - 08:02 AM, said: WGs naming conventions are going to have fun with all the RN ship classes where the name of the class isn't the name of any of the ships, never mind the lead ship. Half the cruisers and most of the destroyers qualify for maximum confusion. I predict many forum rants along the lines of "WG are so dumb there was never an HMS Town" or "OMG it wasn't called the Hood class". There was a page long argument one time someone referred to the "Atago class"... Fortunately thats a non-starter in most cases. The name in those cases should be the lead ship of the class. e.g.: Kent, London, Southampton, Edinburgh, Laforey, etc.

I wouldn't be surprised if that was true as well cough Campbeltown cough.

Theres actually more to it than that. The only one I can remember off the top of my head is that the powder rooms and the shell rooms swap levels. Wherever they end up, the C hull should be very nice.

Its the largest by tonnage as well. Yes, but as said by others, its a poor compromise. A centenary happens once. Ever. A compromise for a whole number of engagements is fine when there is no significant anniversary. But having it take precedence over a centenary is weak.

The four Konigsberg (ii)s, also with double tubes rather than singles.

Its any of the last eight of the Coln (ii) class, with double tubes rather than singles.

One of the Helgolands, Kaisers or Moltke. This is WG, they could well do one of Kaiser's sister ships. Helgoland also fits at tier 4, just. Seydlitz would probably be the regular tier 4. We can hope.

One would think that it would be a no brainer, given the impending centenary. Unless of course its just a paper ship. Need those infidel capitalist dollars for mid year bonuses.

No, they modified them almost as soon as they got them. They were only ever going to be convoy escorts so covering the aft with a gun was less of an issue.