lafeel

Speaking of bits, can anyone help me? I'm trying to find this one, and failing miserably.

Check the article "don't be late for the WOWS anniversary" on the news site/in game and hit the button at the bottom.

Seems to be in the article "don't be late to the WOWS anniversary" Now I need to find where I missed a one somewhere..<.<

That wasn't even a complete list as that's only the tier 8-9&10

To be fair if you don't win you do get your doubloons back..

Have two Tirpitzes, a Bismarck, two Pommerns, a Odin, and a Brandenburg. (oh and a GK) I have to say that, for me at least, the answer is a resounding yes.

Maybe Painezor will finally get to own a one now.

Pretty much. Basically boils down to that her issues hamper her less than the other two's do.

Should note that I actually like the Z-35.

And don't forget, no amount of angling is going to stop whoever is shooting at you from just reliably farming your HP by shooting at the carrier bit.

And if plodding through the 23 knot Kansas the last few weeks has taught me anything, it is that speed is a major asset.

I have to echo the suggestion for Mainz. Bayard is basically a slightly weaker Mainz and Tone frankly is a abomination.

Don't forget her decent speed of 30 knots. Sure it's not as fast as a Richeleu or a Hawke with their speed boosts active, but that is certainly by no means slow.

Verdict is still out on the new British BB's for me. But, I have to say that Monarch has more than earned my respect in the time I have been playing through her, and even earned a permanent port slot. Not bad for a ship I was expecting to be utterly useless.

Wasn't quite that lucky with them, but between some of the sequential bundles and the monthly super container, I got enough coal for this. (plus I already had a Marceau)

The good ole monthly SC, niice^^

Tried cleaning your internet cache and cookies/history?

The way off length would go some way towards explaining how she also magically gained 27K tons.. For those that might not know, dispacement is calulated like this: LengthXBeamXDraftX (how large a % of a box made out of the previous three numbers the ship ACTUALLY fills (hint: it's never 1,0, usually not even close, think the highest I've seen is 0,8) Actually on second thought it might be the entire height of the ship, from the bottom of the keel to the highest point, not just the draft.

They certainly work for that. Sorry but that just that triggered my CDO.

Oh almost forgot, as it's been that long, also been on board the Admiral Chabanenko when she came to visit here a good oh..15-20 years ago. EDIT: 97k tons displacement? While the length figures are accurate enough, I'm calling straight up *edited* on them saying the Yamato displaced that much. EDIT2: A quick check of my copy of Battleships of WW2 reveals her full load displacement, as built, as just under 70K tons. I seriously doubt that her wartime changes (most of which involved sticking more AA on her) came anywhere close to adding another 27K tons to that.

Just going to give all our newcomers a hearty welcome on board^^

Got to admit, that one was too good to pass up though.

Under absolutely no circumstances should you ever be stationary in a French DD, that is the best advice I can give you.

Jingles wouldn't be Jingles if he didn't do all of those things. It is as simple as that. If you don't like it, use a different voice over, problem solved.

Not a exxageration either. Strongly suspect that some of the folks that were in the que when I showed up still hadn't been let on board when the time period to get on board ended, two and a half hours later