lafeel

Not really a waste as such tbh..Not if you have a specific goal in mind, that is.

Started out okay, tried to turn into one of those days, actually turned out pretty good in the end.

Just ran into @Hanse77SWE while knocking off my Asashio snowflake. Seems I had a better time of it than you did despite a lack of targets suitable for her torps mate.

This will change though if that proposed change to module damage actually causing HP damage to the ship goes through, however..

No you can not. Or compliment them for that matter.

First game's included more for the sheer number of defended ribbons than damage (as a side note, finished the 55 defended/torp hits mission that game) Other two are more traditional good games imho.

Arguing nothing, this is a fact. My Baltimore certainly didn't have a hard time of it. And mangled a Riga's side armor with my Tallinn..

Pretty sure that Riga, which is after all the subject of this thread, also has the same issue as Petey, ie very weak side armor.

Although should be noted that the Petey's sides are made of tissue paper, so better not show them to anyone if you can help it. Not seen enough Stalingrads to see if she has the same issue.

Stealthier, faster in a straight line, considerably more agile too.

All I am going to say is that I dare anyone here to call the potential firepower that the Thunderer has at her disposal, with HE or with AP boring.

*cough* Tallinn *cough* Also, stand corrected on the Seydlitz.

Not talking about anything you're testing till WG says you can at least..

Needs a catch all "meh" option, quite frankly.

Technically they have, as a CV. Didn't you know Weser was her post conversion (and apparently renamed during it) Also, I may or may not regret this, but I am a sucker for them German cruisers as well, so I bought her myself earlier.

Putting the Mighty into Mighty Mo..Also, seem to have lost two points of karma today..Also, games like that last one are why I don't play my Kutuzov more, she makes me feel so very dirty.

The moral of this being that, as with all things in this game, your mileage may vary.

Not as unique as you might think, as several Dutch destroyers also had sea planes. Mind you they had to lower it to the sea before launch as they didn't have a catapult (which would be the unique part in this) but a sea plane non the less. On that note there's also that infamous 72K ton monstorisity that Gibbs & Cox developed for the VMF..

On paper, no, in practice it can feel like a lot more of a difference.

Getting him to explain that can be about as fun as a root canal at times though.. Note I am not saying his opinion is any more wrong, or right for that matter, than anyone elses', it'd just help the rest of us considerably if he did a better job of explaining why he feels the way he does about things.

Should be noted that just because Flamu says something, it doesn't mean it's true.

So happens that I did, which is why I have been seriously considering this ship since she was first announced.

Sounds like he likes her, all in all, am I right @Adm_Ballsey ?

Probably intentionally, breaks up the line of the bow, seen something similar on ships in RL.

Decided to end it after only eight games played today. At least these three made up for the bad ones.