Veilingmeat

I unlocked the Halland today and have tried a few games in her. She seems solid enough. I've swopped out Torp Tubes Mod 2 (slot 6) for Gun Fire Control 2 ...and vice versa to weight them: 12.1 km gun range 90 sec Trop reload versus 10.4 km gun range 76.5 sec Trop reload If you *have* the HALLAND... What do we generally feel performs better? Initially my thougths are the shells feel floaty at range... Cheers...

Can someone tell me what this Mod is and where i can find it? Cheers in advance!

I want the ability to chose the appropriate Consumable during the 30 second wait timer prior to battle beginning where the ship im in has a selection of consumables in a given slot For example a Fletcher has Speed Boost and Def AA assigned to the same consumable slot. Not all battles have a CV so if i have selected Def AA in port I'm denied the reasonable use of a consumable slot when I enter a battle that has no CV. Similarly If I chose Torp Reload in a Yugomo and I enter a battle where smoke will be more valuable to me because of the presence of a CV then I want the ability to select the more appropriate consumable to give the the best possile chance ar success. I beleive my request is reasonable.

EDIT: Merged into the main topic. Please do not create seperate threads about same subject, especially If you are quoting something from the said topic. "Misconceptions! OK... interesting word. Allow me to illucidate on what WG interprete in the word "misconception". My Comments: "I recently commented to a friend on DISCORD where speech in personal conversations amongst friends is indeed utterly ...FREEEEE(dom)!  "I see Flamu got booted off the CC program for speaking truth to power (...or some bollocks!) He's got a vid up on YT about it. Hes not whinging, but I am surprised that its taken him this long to realise he was just being a Company Shill. WG give ppl, like him, free sh*t so he will say good things about their game and only cuz he has a measure of influence (in his followers) ..."all" 110k of them (hardly the seething masses). When you perform that role you are little more than the Prisoner-cum-Guard in some kind of Prison Camp. Watch the movie "The Pianist" [Yes! it got oodles of movie awards!]. Hence his Tweet regarding the questionable performance of Mel Gibson in Braveheart. WG appreciate it is better to have community contributors as President Richard Nixon put it "inside the tent pissing out". Soon as you don't toe the line though WG will laugh you off. TBF tho his latest vids have been pointing out how wank a lot of their new ships are ...like regarding the KM DD's which have not done him any favours. And which I personal believe is just the tipping point that led to his metoric demise. But in fairness, Flamu is probably right looking at the data on the new KM DDs so far. WG is clearly milking shyte ideas in lack of anything esle to do with their 9 yeaar old White Elephant ...while wanting to look 'productive'." NB: I would urge you all to note the terms and phrases I have emphasised via 'italic' or 'bold'. These tools have been employed to emphasise those elements of my comments which you should pay(to win) particular attention to.  I'm not a FLAMU Fanboi by any means but he is being scapegoated even tho hes a company man...

"Misconceptions! OK... interesting word. Allow me to illucidate on what WG interprete in the word "misconception". My Comments: "I recently commented to a friend on DISCORD where speech in personal conversations amongst friends is indeed utterly ...FREEEEE(dom)! "I see Flamu got booted off the CC program for speaking truth to power (...or some bollocks!) He's got a vid up on YT about it. Hes not whinging, but I am surprised that its taken him this long to realise he was just being a Company Shill. WG give ppl, like him, free sh*t so he will say good things about their game and only cuz he has a measure of influence (in his followers) ..."all" 110k of them (hardly the seething masses). When you perform that role you are little more than the Prisoner-cum-Guard in some kind of Prison Camp. Watch the movie "The Pianist" [Yes! it got oodles of movie awards!]. Hence his Tweet regarding the questionable performance of Mel Gibson in Braveheart. WG appreciate it is better to have community contributors as President Richard Nixon put it "inside the tent pissing out". Soon as you don't toe the line though WG will laugh you off. TBF tho his latest vids have been pointing out how wank a lot of their new ships are ...like regarding the KM DD's which have not done him any favours. And which I personal believe is just the tipping point that led to his metoric demise. But in fairness, Flamu is probably right looking at the data on the new KM DDs so far. WG is clearly milking shyte ideas in lack of anything esle to do with their 9 yeaar old White Elephant ...while wanting to look 'productive'." NB: I would urge you all to note the terms and phrases I have emphasised via 'italic' or 'bold'. These tools have been employed to emphasise those elements of my comments which you should pay(to win) particular attention to.

Your silence is thunderous...

I want the ability to chose the appropriate Consumable during the 30 second wait timer prior to battle beginning where the ship im in has a selection of consumables in a given slot For example a Fletcher has Speed Boost and Def AA assigned to the same consumable slot. Not all battles have a CV so if i have selected Def AA in port I'm denied the reasonable use of a consumable slot when I enter a battle that has no CV. Similarly If I chose Torp Reload in a Yugomo and I enter a battle where smoke will be more valuable to me because of the presence of a CV then I want the ability to select the more appropriate consumable to give the the best possile chance ar success. I beleive my request is reasonable.

Agreed no more than two DDs per game.

...I have doubts!

So, Dude... in the final analysis, do you think your game is gonna match this level of nerve-shredding excitment?

A ratio of 34:14 Which is what? 72%? Of course, I'm expecting a cataclysmic string of losses this evening. The Match-Maker-Monkey will need to balance it's books and take back what its owed! Anyhow IMO ...DD is simply the most entertaning class to play. [Click the image three times to view it at 100% scale] Note: I add as a personal belief but you can see at the bottom in the Petropavlosk how what you all think is your ability to play the game is actually win loss handed to you via the match maker algorithm. What is given is taken away! The Universe must be balanced!

I have only three words to say in response to this! 'Stat Padding Edited*' edit: watch the language please

Yeah, Sanity Points Lost.

Agreed, generally Ranked is far more enjoyable than the Toxic Dumping Ground of 'Standard Bollocks' that is Random battle (which I have assayed on previous occasions is in no way Random). Consequently this is also why Ranked needs to be available an rewarded as a legit game Mode at least as equally as Standard Bollocks. Edit following further consideration: WARGAMING DEVS, in the spirit of inclusivity it might also be an idea to offer players with disabilities a means to display the fact on their ships if they felt they wanted to. TROLLs in chat will not always take in to acccount that are playing with others that have personal challanges not reailly evident in a 3D video game before they start throwing salt around!

'Double Strike' and 'Kraken Unleashed' triggered at the same time and bought me 'Second Wind'. This regenerated my HP from around 100 HP over the remaining 4 minutes of the battle and allowed me to endure the following an totally unrelenting air strikes that then saw 24 planes shot down! :P The Double Strike actually 'stole a march' and put us ahead by something like 5 or 7 points to bring home the win. BUT! In the dying 30 seconds the last BB alive made it to our cap and the opposition managed to nudge back ahead to take the win back! Correct! That's Dreadnaught on a DD with no native heal! =)

d00d... the tool tip says -10%.. Theres a lot of long words in there, I'm naught but a humble Pirate... Look, no offence man, I respect you... but I really dont get why you phuckers are so aye-nal. The stats change is less imortant ...as to the reason they (WG) want/need to change the way we all play the game in general. DEAD EYE is simply a response to players not pushing caps or getting aggressive but hanging back and trying to last each battle as long as possible. The want to inject energy in to their game... DEAD EYE seeks to punish passive gameplay and reward agressive players who want to control the tempo of combat... thats all! You can all short stroke the statistical mechanics of % till you are blue in the face but in the final analysis if you do not move and DOMINATE the map in Domination games you will be DOMINATED.

I believe the word you are looking for is "Trolling" Edit: ...or stating the phuqing obvious!

all this hostility to me is making me want to self harm! :(

Harsh man, I only want to be loved. That too much to ask?

I think you lot are too harsh on the Devs and community managers they clearly have the companies best interests at heart and that has to be a good thing right? Reading the above I see all reasonable community concerns responded to with an effectived and well expressed rationale. I personally think you should not change a single element of the new commander skills patch! Dead Eye is amazing and shouldn't be changed in anyway. I hasten to add Secondaries were always over rated. I wont miss not having them while serfing the J Line nuking fools from orbit with my epic finger of God skillz!

Thats is what Dispersion is d00d! Dispersion is a function of Range from Target! The variable of dispersion (exactly how much scatter in yer rounds as the fall on target) is simply a calculation that Wargaming have determined offers the 'fairest chllange to difficulty' in the game. What DEAD EYE does is to allow a player to add a base -10% to the current rate of dispersion when certain conditions have been met. In the case of DEAD EYE when you are beyond hard detect range of any enemy vessels the effect activates.

Everything Flamuu says in this vid regarding DEAD EYE simply confirms what I suspect is the true motivation for these changes. Its to encourage a type of behaviour in BBs (effectively split BBs from the rest of the Fleet) so when SS (Submarines) are introduced there is a 'no mans land' between BBs and all other ships which Subs can exploit. Therefore it is essential that BBs withdraw fro the fight as much as possible. Can't wait! =)

In the words of King Theoden - 'If this is to be our end, then I would have them make such an end, as to be worthy of remembrance!'. Yup! thats two Battleship kills back to back resolved in both BB's DETONATING... lol The odds on that must be astronomical! Bitter defeat made glorious victory... I kept my star =p PS: Ye I also wondere wtf my team was doing at the same time... EDIT 03/02/21: Two more BB's detonated today with torp strikes! A pattern doth surely emerge!

Yet, I can see no particular skills in the new rework that embellish SS or anti-SS tactics. ...Oh dear! Nevermind thought, with all the BBs hanging on the J Line in future ...they are all going to be away from their support ships and making themselves utterly vulnerable to SS attack. Thats awesome I cant wait! So as I have said earlier in this new commander skills rework article. DEAD EYE Is essential to the future of this game an every BB needs to have it if they have a brain in their heads! Dead Eye 4tw...