Volgan

Remove award for being top player on the losing side in ranked battles. I think a tactic I see in ranked games is one of your team holding back to try to secure the top spot on the losing team. Ive exchanged messages with players who have admitted changing their committment to the win on the first sign of defeat. Its hard enough playing with so many noobs in ranked that the game is becoming super annoying at times. I suggest removing the "top of the crap heap" award of not losing a rank if your side is defeated. If your side loses everyone should lose. What do others think.

I know this is few months old now but I hope you picked the Thunderer. I got the Pommern because I seemed to be coming up against it an awful lot and I could see my rounds bouncing off it and for some reason whenever I got a chance to broadside it in my Izumo the result was not a resounding citadel-fest that I would expect - in fact I got a chance to broadside one in my Izumo at a range of 8.1km and every shot from my three turrets either fell just short or wizzed over the top and not a single one hit home!!!! I swear to God that is true. So I thought gee the Pommern seems to be quite the ship, quite the brawler that can take a hit or two I would like to have one - sucker - SUCKER!!! I got one and I forgot that major weakness of all things German on the high seas. And I share with you, especially those young blue eyed Nelsons out there to remember, that German ships actually burst into flame when they come into contact with sea water. In fact its official that the most often given command in the German Navy is "put that fire out".... So I hoped you picked the Thunderer....... Good luck.

Cosmetic changes should not be a problem but anything that for example adds a predictive marker is just plain cheating. I've been playing games on the PC since a pentium 2 processor (I was once the less than proud ower of a ZX81 I'll have you know) and mods have been a god send for gamers. Every game I have played has been enhanced by mods in fact some of the big name games have been positively saved by it - RTW2 anyone?. Theres a lot of creativity and talent out there that produces some great mods that dont cross the line. I applaud WG's efforts to police this minefield of a subject but for them it makes business sense to. Would you come to a game that is renowned for being cheater heavy or OP dominated. If any of you play WOT could you imagine starting off fresh right now and maintaining an interest as the ubertanks once again flatten you or some guy one shots you with an amazing long range shot. I like the three strike rule - its a good approach for cheating. Remains to be seen if WG will practice it with paying punters.

I got one today in try your luck - gave me an engine modification 1. Looked for "push SC over side" option but was none. An engine modification 1 my [edited]....

Ok so i like the container system. Adds a new thing and we get flags. Today I git the first SC for absolute weeks. It gave me an engine modification 1 !!!! I mean come on. An engine modification 1 in a SC. I actually went yea a SC. Opened her up and yeaaaa an engine modification 1. Well stuff that. if i could have i would have ordered those guys doing the cleaning to push that SC over the side. Sorry for resurecting an old thread...

I hated the Colorado at the start I really did but man did I warm to her in the end. You put the right modules on her to give a bit of extra range and she hits well. I actually regret selling her to move on the the NC. Not that its bad but you know having to grind and all that. A big downside is that the NC seems to me to be the start of the credit squeeze that would require me to prem up which Im just no able to do at the moment. It takes about 140k to get her repaired each game which means I have to fall back to the smaller money ships. Which is a bore.