NoirLotus

Arrête de rêver, ce genre de système de scoring n'est jamais partagé par les entreprises qui les font ...

J'ai fait de même et il est vraiment bon !!

According to the Valve Time charts, it will come "shortly" !!

Nope !! You only get a free port slot when a new nation is released and the T1 ship of this nation is provided.

This video is quite old. Changes in planes research were implemented this spring and AA gunnery was reworked. Considering that everything is now implying that WG wants to keep the CV player population quite low, I don't see a new branch of CV coming around ...

Doing well with a CV in 1 game doesn't make you a good CV captain. You have around 50% win in all your CV games and only 37% with Bogue so I highly doubt that you could screw over anyone in Zuiho. You are an average CV player and you never tried the japanese CVs. So you really have no idea on what is their strength and what could be changed to give a little boost to US CV ... I'm myself an average CV player but I tried both lines to make my opinion. And Defensive AA consumable will not be removed. Devs want ot give some consumables to CV and CV sniping has too much influence on the result of the game to be kept in game ...

It seems that tricolor marking on turrets is Vichy Régime camo pattern, so in fact no French players like me won't like it !!

20 millions c'est le prix de n'importe quel T10 ...

The german DD will have a problem in WoWS : they used 150 mm guns so they won't be able to use skills like BFT/EM/AFT. I don't know how WG will deal with them ...

1.7 de RoF ?? quand il n'a que 8 canons et d'un calibre inférieur aux autres BB T6 (donc dégâts plus faibles) ??

The problem of French DD is that Russian DD are already on that niche (very fast gunboats), so the chance that they are implemented as something rather shitty is not negligible ...

A few updates ago, mounting C hull decreased your AA rating, as you were losing 1 turret with DP guns. Is it always the case ?

FIFO !!

Mais euh, je voulais le poster pour troller firetitans ... Sinon, le post de firetitans, c'est comme à WoT ces JPzE-100 qui viennent râler parce qu'un light T7 s'est calé dans leur dos pour leur défoncer l'arrière-train. Quand ton adversaire sait comment jouer sur ses forces et sur tes faiblesses, oui en général ça finit mal. Comme le dit le dicton, c'est le jeu ma pôv' Lucette !! On peut peut-être passer à autre chose ...

Quand un DD pop à 7km, tu lui mets ta bordée d'AP, même avec l'overpénétration, c'est tjr 1000 et qq par hit. A 7 km, c'est pas trop dur de toucher plusieurs fois donc tu lui fais déjà bien mal et la prochaine bordée sera à la HE pour le finir (sans compter les secondaires hein ! L'OP était en Yamato).

Ce sera du triple 406 aux dernières nouvelles. Le T9 sera un H-39 en coque A et un H-41 en coque B, et le T10 sera un H-41 avec des tourelles triples issues des archives secrètes que WG fait rédiger pour justifier ses choix d'équilibrage.

Allons c'est firetitans ... Sinon, c'est pas comme s'il n'était pas expliqué sur le forum en long, en large et en travers que les AP sur un DD, ça ne fait que des overpénétrations, que les DD n'ont pas de citadelles donc leur tirer dessus à l'AP a encore moins de sens et que du fait de leur pool de PV réduit, ils ont une gestion des dégâts particulière.

In fact, you must consider that IJN DD is cut in two : one goes up to T5 with Minekaze as end of the line. Then starts a new DD branch from Mutsuki to Shimakaze. Mutsuki is not an improvement of Minekaze, it's a ship aimed to teach you how to play the high tier IJN DDs.

Non, le nouveau MM ne concerne que les randoms.

Seriously you have no idée of what you are talking about ... Why don't you try to play japanese CV if they are so strong ? Go play Zuiho, you will see how "easy" it is to cover your bombers from an AS Bogue with only 1 fighter squadron, or how many torps hits you can get with japanese TB. Try it !! See how "easy" it is to hit with a bomb when your DB are panicked ...

You complain that high tier USN CV suffer because IJN CV have more fighter squadrons, but Zuiho is OP when it has only 1 fighter squadron to deal with AS Bogues (or 1/2/2 Ruyjo vs AS Independence) ? And I notice that you talk a lot about cross dropping with Japanese CV, but forget to mention that their torp drop pattern is sol loose that the only way to get effective with it. USN TB have a much efficient drop pattern so it's easy to hit with 4 or 5 torps with a single squadron ... IJN planes reload faster because squadron size is lower. It's the same reason Saipan can reload so fast. CV have different gameplays : USN are easy to handle, with monotask flight deck (air superiority or strike). IJN CV have polyvalent flight decks, but they require much more work as you have to deal with more squadrons. In the current metagame, skilled players have a preference for IJN CV, as their skill is always more rewarded with a polyvalent ship. Except for the Ranger, I'm not sure that USN CV need to get buffed, and your proposal to give IJN CV almost the same number of squadrons than the US CV without changing the number of planes per squadron is just ridiculous ...

T5 : Zuiho sealclubber at T5 ? With the bazillion of AS bogues running around ?? T6 : No !! T7 : 1/1/2 on Ranger could do the trick, rest is stupid. T8 : No !! T9 : No !! T10 : No of course !! If you want to remove squadrons from japanese CV, give them 6 planes per squad !! IJN CV are all about management of lots of weaker squads, USN CV are easier to play and have fewer stronger squads. If you remove between 1/4 and 1/3 of their squads you break the balance.

Ils avaient dit que ce serait le cas sur les premiums, qui sont supposés représenter un navire unique. Les navires stadanrd représentent toute leur classe et donc n'auront pas de nom.

Rudder Shift Time

A côté de cela, il a aussi un RST moins bon, une pénétration plus faible (selon Flamu) et une DCA inférieure (mais ça, tout le monde s'y attendait !!).