NoirLotus

This is a low tier battle. You must keep in mind that beginners with less than 100 battles need to do a lot of damage on allies to turn pink.

Oui, depuis le changement sur les normalisations, les AP de cuirassés ont l'air d'avoir plus de chances de faire une pénétration standard sur un DD.

I like all those smokes in Ranked. I get so many torpedo hits when my Benson launch its 10 torpedos in those clouds ...

Alors d'un les munitions de la DCA ne sont pas faites pour aller dans l'eau, la quasi totalité doit exploser à la surface. Tirer sur la torpille doit être possible mais ça doit avoir autant de chances de succès que tirer au fusil sur un char. De deux, l'Iowa a pu tenter cela car le navire qui a lancé la torpille l'a prévenu, il pouvait donc tirer bien avant que la torpille ne soit repérée par le cuirassé lui-même. Enfin de trois, les BB ayant déjà une très forte DCA seraient encore plus avantagés car ils pourraient en plus d'abattre les TB, détruire les qq torpilles que le CV aurait pu larguer contre lui. Donc NON !!

The colors on the tail are incorrect !! English planes have red/white/blue on their tail. It's french planes that have blue/white/red.

It looks like a Fairey Flycatcher. It was he standard fighter used in CV in the late 20s / beginning of 30s but could be converted in floatplane for capital ships. It could be a decent fighter for Leander or maybe Emerald.

Perso, ce sont - les mecs qui restent 15 km derrière pour tirer uniquement à portée max et ne surtout pas prendre de coup, surtout quand ce sont des BB qui devraient tanker pour la team - les DD qui ne vont pas capper - quand je suis un BB, les obus qui overpénétrent un croiseur T+2 qui est broadside à 8 km ... - les torpilleurs de seconde ligne

There was a change in the rework ? Now the Fubuki sub-class are in the gunboat line ?

Nothing new ... Devs have already said several times that Enterprise is a big candidate for a premium CV, but that doesn't mean it will come soon.

I find Caledon quite enjoyable, but it mainly fights other british CL right now. The main problem of T4 or T5, from what I saw, is that their gun layout force them to show broadside, and they have huge citadelles (almost the size of tha Yubari's one) and weak armor. So I will skip them most probably ...

Il a l'avantage d'être le seul T1 qui tire des AP, et avec bcp de canons. Donc dès qu'un adversaire montre ses flancs, c'est citadelle sur citadelle. C'est drôle mais la trajectoire des obus est quand même pas géniale ...

Weymouth is like all T2 cruisers : it's a generic cruiser from WW1, with nothing specific from the nation it belongs. So you can skip it with no remorse, as it has absolutely no flavor ...

Il will grind some and skip others. Anyway, I think I will stop at T6 or 7.

I will always try my luck, what is the point of a lottery if you don't go for the big prize ?

Yeah, Gneisenau (and Bayern also) has the biggest guns of its tier, so it has a greater chance of overpenetration, especially on cruisers. With Bayern, I shot several times T8 cruisers (Kutuzov and Hipper) showing their broadsides at less than 8 km, hit them right in the middle, just above the waterline and only scored ovepenetrations. Buyt it is still a great ship !!

In France, and more specifically for rugby teams, "Sorry good game" is considered as the worst taunt, almost an insult ...

When I was playing my Nagato, I had a domination game on Ocean. The game was tight, so to increase our chances to win, I asked a Kamikaze to cap one of the point. He was very low life anyway (around 200 hp) so that was the best thing to do for him. But, no, he decided to camp in the top left corner of A1. After I insisted, he changed his mind, and then tried to suicide by colliding with me, and he barely managed to hit me ...

Là aucun rapport, la diminution du blindage n'est pas suffisante pour provoquer des over-pénétrations des AP spéciales anglaises ...

Ce sont les changements de blindage qui ont été testés (puis annulés) sur la 0.5.12. Ce sont peut-être juste des artefacts de la version précédente. Il faudrait une confirmation officielle pour être sûr que cela ira bien en 0.5.13 ...

Containers, why not ... Optimisation in port : I didn't see any difference New map : not convinced, lots of small islands is not bad but I saw too maany players going to the edge of the map because they were scared of being torped by an ambushed DD. Moreover, I have a feeling that the northen spawn has an advantage with the north side of the map.

Ce sont surtout 2 des premières branches implémentées si je me rappelle bien. Ca illustre clairement une tendance au power creep que WG devrait franchement corriger ...

Really ?? Kongo : Armament (1913) : 8 × 356 mm (14 in) naval gun (4×2) 16 × 6-inch (15 cm) 50 caliber naval guns (16×1) 8 × 76 mm (3 in) naval guns (8×1)[1] 4 × 6.5 mm (0.26 in) machine gun[3] 8 × submerged 533 mm (21.0 in) torpedo tubes Armament (1944) : 8 × 356 mm (14 in) naval gun (4×2) 8 × 152 mm (6.0 in) naval gun (8×1) 8 × 127 mm (5 in) guns (4×2)[1] 122 × 25 mm Type 96 Antiaircraft autocannon Fuso : Armament (as built) : 6 × twin 356 mm (14 in) guns 16 × single 152 mm (6 in) guns 5 × single 76 mm (3 in) AA guns 6 × 533 mm (21.0 in) torpedo tubes Armament (1944) : 6 × 2 - 356 mm guns 14 × 1 - 152 mm guns 4 × 2 - 127 mm (5 in) dual-purpose guns 95 × 25 mm (1 in) AA guns Nagato : Armament (as built) : 4 × twin 41 cm guns 20 × single 14 cm guns 4 × single 76 mm AA guns 8 × 533 mm (21.0 in) torpedo tubes Armament (1944) : 4 × twin 41 cm guns 18 × single 14 cm guns 4 × twin 127 mm (5 in) DP guns 98 × 25 mm (1 in) AA guns Nagato Torpedo tubes (and some 140 mm guns) were removed on 1926 and 1934 refits.

They are not in the game because IRL they were so inefficient that they were removed historically on ALL these ships.

Some DD like Kagero carried spare torpedoes and could reload at sea. And how DD stealth is more ridiculous than BB ability to regain hitpoints ??

Non, c'est 4 max seulement.