NoirLotus

I have a few questions about Stealth and the meta : In the current meta, at the exception of a handful of ships (like Khaba or secundaires focused german BB), all ships are using a stealth build : Concealment Expert perk and Concealment System Mod 1. This lead to having at higher tier BBs with a concealment close to 12 km, a range at which BB guns are deadly for cruisers, meaning a few seconds of distraction in cruiser (or worse if a smart BB attack from an unexpected position) will often mean a return to the port. Moreover, now that steath fire has been removed, as the bloom after firing is 20 seconds, we have this aberration that a shooting BB is spotted only 2/3 of the time, while a cruiser with its fast reload will always remain spotted. What is the devs' opinion on this stealth meta ? Do they consider normal that in a class-system game, the tanking class is more efficient with a stealth build ? Could they consider removing acceess to Concealment System Mod 1 for battleships ?

Don't forget that everyone got a 10% coupon this week. Are you really surprised that WG is ajusting the price of a highly expected premium to keep thdir profits on par ??

Yeah let's feast upon the time the british have backstabbed their best ally (I must say that they were well helped by the stupid behaviour of some high level officers of french navy). And in one month, we will celebrate the greatest "strategic repositionning" of WW2 with a movy that has decided to completely ignore the sacrifice of 35k french soldiers. Hey WG EU, when will you offer to french players a white flag, in order to keep on the cheese eating surrendering monkeus jokes ? Seriously, I'm french so I'm really eager to get one ...

The last time I got accused of cheating with aimbot, I killed a low life Kutuzov at 18 km with my Arizona. I was using my spotter plane and I just aimed at all 4 different choices he had to go (left, right, full forward or just a bit forward his current position (in case he slowed down).

They bufff the damage but they also reduced the penetration, and changed the way the penetration is reduced. Corgi Fleet is an event on NA : you have to hunt and kill ships whose nicknames are CORGI-random number, the yare driven by CM.

I tried it once, victory with 5 stars. It is now even easier than on the test server and I already considered it as the easiest of all 4 scenarios. The Bayern have been removed so you never meet T6 (save ofr the Gaede just at the end).

Dites moi, il n'y avait pas une mission qui filait quelques fanions dragon si on faisait une division à 4+ sur le serveur test 0.6.6 pour les scénarios ?

J'aime bien les scénarios PvE mais à mon avis WG a fait la même erreur que sur les premières saisons de RB : il ne faut permettre qu'un seul tier, car avoir trop de T5 est très compliqué dans certains scénarios (et surtout quand une classe comme le CV se voit privé du tir manuel à ce tier).

Mandatory video :

Nothing, but the website says it should come nearly 7 days after the end of the event so we should get it next week.

I tried twice and got 3 & 5 stars. It is quite good, with an IA that you must protect and lots of enemy to kill. The best strat I think is 1 CV, 2 BB, 3 CC, 1 DD. The team must push very fast and focus fire to kill enemies as fast as possible. If you stay back, reds will focus on IAs and you won't be able to get 5 stars.

Lol !! La dernière grosse surprise que vous nous avez faite, c'était 10 camos ... Et si vous voulez vraiment qu'on n'aille pas chercher des infos ailleurs, vous pourriez peut-être faire en sorte qu'EU ne soit pas systématiquement le dernier à donner des infos, que ce soit les patchnotes ou les events. Ah oui, et puis faire un effort aussi sur les traductions, parce que non seulement vous êtes toujours à la bourre, mais la moitié du temps, c'est soit incomplet soit erroné ...

I have a kind of mixed build : 1- DCCA 2- AR and EM 3- BoS (I use premium heal) 4- MCAA

The few games I did in scenarios with random players, I saw several times plyqers stqying back and go8ng for repairs when they take a bit of damage. Usually, that mens fewer ships to fight AI and then a defeat. So I don't think putting those repair ships in PvP would be a good idea. Bad players could camp near them to get heal faster and today's gameplay with lots of BB is already too much passive ...

I'm not a great fan of premium paper shkps but I really like that camo. I may buy for doubloons when it will be available and there will be a 30% reduction on T6 premiums.

Yet it's less ridiculous that the advertisement I got ingame to buy a Hood bundlex1 hour ago to complete the campaign faster ...

Are you serious Wargaming ?? I just had this after a game a few minutes ago : It was already questionable during the campaign to receive this kind of advertisement, but you keep doing this now that the campaign has ended ...

I got my share of fail teams today, but it goes both ways too. Estuary in Domination, I go left with only my platoon mate and the Myoko, we faced Akatsuki, Algérie New Orléans plus all their T8 BBs. We killed the DD (thank you Radar !!), Algérie, NO plus the Tirpitz while kiting away slowly after the first kills. On the other side, the rest of the team just roflstomped the few they were facing ... A became a ship cemetaary, and it seems that enemy BBs decided to rescue the crew of their teamates as they pushed when we were gone for long ...

Wyoming, because Seagal is just a big sealclubber so he must go on an appropriate ship ...

If you read carefully, they only said they won't do staggered releases in the future on RU server !!! They said nothing about other servers ...

I searched a bit but most I found were Gearing class DDs, and I hghly doubt WG will choose one of them ...

I like flags overall in WoWS especiallu the historical ones. But I must say that the bloat of flags of the past weeks become boring. And they only underline the big problem of flags in the game at this time : THERE IS NO CLAN FLAG ON MY SHIPS !!!

I got my camos, flag and achievment nearly 1 hour ago.

Yeah the gun penetration was shitty bunt instead of correcting it, let's just screw more DD with 381 mm AP standard penetrations ...

I don't !! This skin should be how damaged ships in game look like, not a camo for one ship ...