Exocet6951

Honestly, I don't know why I even bother with RN threads anymore. At least a quarter of the posts are tin-foil "WG wants the brits to fail" type posts. The Italian ship threads are exemplary, why can't they be like those? Is it too late for you to suggest WG releases Italian ships first ?

Did you know that the Kirov has a quite small powder charge on those 180s? They lose all their penetration rather quickly, to a point where even the Soviet 152s with AP are more reliable at ranges further than 8km (estimated with my experience). Of course you didn't. You're not looking for knowledge or game balance, you just want to rant on numerical values. Which is sad, because you don't know a quarter of the Kirov's soft stats, and the Brtitish cruisers are under NDA. You're literally trying to compare things based on their basic appearance. You might as well just start saying that the Yorck is OP as **** because it has 210mm guns of doom compared to other cruisers.

In his defense, torpedoes do look somewhat phallic <.<

Tried the stacking both rudder shift mods on the Shchors. My rudder turned as fast as a DD, but I still turned worse than quite a few high tier BBs. Waggling your *** won't save you when a shell randomly punches through it and into your citadel. Rudder shift is only the half of it. Mix it with an decrease in turn radius, and I'd be game. Until then, it's long range flamethrowing and staying the hell away from BBs whenever possible.

I guarantee you he installed a module to make the turrets turn faster at the expense of loading time.

lolwut? 2-3 fires per salvo? I wish. I ****ing wish. Then, reduce to 2%? Considering the ridiculously high reduction in fire chance that goes up to 50% at tierX, and the worrying increase in BB deck armor that tends to absord more and more 152-203mm HE shells, you just admitted that you want to use BBs to crush poor, helpless ships that have absolutely no way to damage you back. In short; Torpedoes OP CVs OP Fires OP Anything that can even remotely be a threat to my (hilariously overbuffed) master race ship OP.

How to Nagato? Well I (thankfully) finished it before the faceroll easy German BBs came along, but my point stands even more now : assume you're outclassed as a brawler, and just stay angled at 12km-ish. Your belt armor should bounce most things there, and the few penetrating hits plunging through the deck should only do normal damage. There's really no way to justify playing the Nagato anymore, when the Gneinesau has more speed, more maneuverability, better armor, better AA, more useful secondaries (low velocity 140mm AP isn't much use against anything other than poorly armored cruiser who aren't angled), and even torpedoes, even if you have better guns and 2 more of them.

I'm pretty sure people would flip their **** if the Bismarck was floating around in the Thames

Last week, I was in a 2 CV per side match, with 2 strike CVs vs 2 AS CVs. As it turns out, even if you only have 1 US DB squadron, and 1 IJN DB + 1 TB squadron, you can actually deal a lot of damage at tier6. And ruin 2 people's games at the same time. Hooray for losing all your planes in 4 minutes flat. AS setups are moronic. Too much emphasis on the amount of fighters, rather than their quality. Especially at lower tier, when you barely have enough planes in reserve to fully refurnish your squadrons.

So you report someone who has a bad computer/internet connection as a bot? Does not compute.

Actually, it's much more resistant than the Ibuki, and it's soon to be the second toughest tier9 cruiser. And it has the most usuable guns, and it's overall the most flexible ship. It's much more suited to a BB-heavy meta than a Baltimore. Would you be able to use the Baltimore like that regularily, I would be impressed, but as it stands, you used the best tier9 cruiser to try to generalize that tier9 cruisers can still do their jobs just fine.

I can deal with German BBs being on average faster, better armored and having better secondaries... But did they really need to have armored decks that absorb over 50% of 152-203mm HE shells ?

I must say, after being a punching bag with tiers 2-9 cruisers, hopping in a Zao in the test server is a breath of fresh air. With a hint of sadism. I feel as unbalanced as BBs! Damn the last 40k xp to go with the Ibuki are feeling long. I've been suck on that ship for 6 months now. High tier gameplay is that dreadful.

Ok, I understand that you're making an effort trying to speak English but honestly, just use Google Translate. It will be easier than to try to make sense of your current messages. I'm not trying to be mean about it.

Just for a reference, this was the same person who claimed that WG hated the British because their tanks in WoT came after the French and could not stop whining about it for YEARS afterwards, and that the British tanks didn't have completely faceroll-level penetration at every tier. It only seems logical for him to wall-o-text rant about BBs not being the Chosen Ones , and that common peasants in non-chosen one ships are able to damage him. QUIZ: How far would a human spotter spot an oxygen torpedo in choppy waters IRL? Answer : Too late. Unlike in this game, where you spot it over 2km away, and where your overbuffed BB maneuverability allows you to slow down and turn and make a 90 degree turn in time to barely be hit at all.

You used the most flexible (and easily arguably the best) tier9 cruiser with a great radar, the best range and accuracy to try to prove that point. I could just as easily used a recent game in a Hipper where a BB 20km away shot over mountains to remove half my hp in a single salvo to prove the contrary. In the end, I did my best and ended up doing a respectable 50k damage thanks to a suicidal Bismark thinking torpedoes were not a thing, but the fact is that I could have just used a Bismark, and have been almost as fast and more decisive in the battle, all while keeping my hydro search.

That's already the case. When you hit a DD with an overpenetrating AP shell, you deal anywhere between 7.5 and 10% of it's total HP. That's ONE over penetrating hit. In comparison, if you overpen the superstructure of a BB with the same shell, you do between 1 and 3% of its total damage, which is also repairable, by the way. Corvi, on 21 September 2016 - 11:13 AM, said: Of course he snot looking for help, he wrote this thread out of pure frustratuion, just like i opened a couple of these when i started palying the game. I have improved since then and i know a BB can delete a cruiser in one salvo, but in comparison to all the "fully aimed, no shells hit" or "3 pens for no dmg and 2 overpens for 2k" are WAY more commong than actually fking up an enemy with one salvo. Sailing a cruiser loaded with AP and seeing the 6-8 citadelle hits that deal 15k dmg with every salvo to enemy cruisers is so much easier, forgiving and more rewarding. Your view on cruisers is laughably off. If that were the case, the Hipper would have an average damage of over 100k damage server-wide. The fact of the matter is that a well aimed AP salvo from a BB on a cruiser can easily deal 6k damage, which is about 15% of its hp, even if RNG is not in your favor and you only get 2 hits out of 8 to 12 guns. Hell, even 2 overpens shaves off 5% hp off a tier8 CA, which is already non-negligible.

"DO NOT PLAY BB'sthis is what you will see "full salvo out on a broadside cruiser..........overpen 2k dmg cruisers are so weak and when we show broadside we get blown up the cry babies said so wargaming said hey lets make it so most of a BB's salvo just overpen the cruisers now " Not someone looking for help, and there's CERTAINLY something wrong with how much damage BBs do to cruiser, but it's sure as hell not "too little" like the OP is telling us right now. This is just a terrible "BBs UP, CAs OP" thread, which is not only idiocy, but simply the opposite. Not only that, but considering the much superior life expectancy of BBs, they offer a great XP and credit reward. And since they're so damn powerful, it's the BBs who decide how the match is played, and ultimately if it's a victory or defeat (in most cases). So yeah, so much for not rewarding. But they're still not dominating enough apparently, and lowly cruiser and DD peasants are still able to damage them with guns, so better nerfhammer everything that isn't the glorious BB mustard race !

BBs underpowered, pls buff. Other classes are still somewhat playable, this must be remedied right this second !

SOLUTION Le problème vient du DNS d'Orange. Il faut configurer manuellement le DNS sous Windows. C'est pas sorcier, vous allez voir. Première étape Trouvez votre point de connexion sous Windows. Ceci se trouve dans : "Panneau de configuration\Réseau et Internet\Connexions réseau" Deuxième étape Clic droit sur le réseau internet que vous utilisez, puis propriété Troisième étape Clic gauche sur "Protocole Internet Version 4 (TCP/IPv4)", puis clic gauche sur le bouton "propriété" qui se trouve sous le menu déroulant. Normalement, vous avez les cases "obtenir adresses IP/DNS automatiquement" de cochées. Nous allons configurer manuellement le DNS en cliquant sur la case "Utiliser l'adresse sur serveur DNS suivant", et les deux champs vont devenir accessible. Quatrième étape http://www.commentcamarche.net/faq/1496-serveurs-dns-des-principaux-fai#orange-livebox Voici la liste des adresses des serveurs DNS, nous, on cherche Orange. Orange / Livebox DNS Primaire : 80.10.246.2 DNS Secondaire : 80.10.246.129 Vous faites un copier coller tout bête du DNS primaire d'Orange dans le champ "serveur DNS préféré" des propriétés TCP/IPv4 qu'on a ouvert dans l'étape 3, et la même chose pour le DNS secondaire d'Orange dans le champ "serveur DNS auxiliaire" Cliquez sur ok une fois terminé pour fermer la fenetre, et cliquez sur ok une deuxième fois dans la fenetre précédente. Un grand merci au joueur: Moluk_le_glukon pour avoir trouvé cette solution pour le client World of Tank. EDIT: lol aurtografe ke jé coriger

Au cas ou il y a encore le moindre doute, client Orange ici, et même soucis. EDIT: Serait-il possible de créer une liste de gens affectés(sur le forum pour éviter de trifouiller dans des bases de données), et de leurs envoyer un message/email quand c'est résolu?

That has never, EVER happened to me in this game. In any case, that sort of message isn't just a typical rage message, it's actually an extremely serious offense that you should report to WG with a support ticket, and if you feel particularily generous with your own time, you could even report it to the police as a genuine death threat. The police won't take it very seriously, but they will take it under consideration.

This, many times this. Every match past tier6 started the same: "I give [x] AA support", "who needs AA" "I cover CV". Now, we see NCs with enough AA to make a Yamato or Montana from 1 year ago green with envy bow camping, claiming "CVs OP, fires OP, torpedoes OP" Stop making BBs superior jack-of-all-trade ships who take a giant poop all over CA's role, and still expects the latter to scout, tank, push, screen, and basically be out-numbered cannon fodder.

And yet, I distinctively remember the earlier days when the greatest fear in a battle was to be in the crosshair of a double US TB partywagon, CAs asked at the start of the battle who needed AA. It wasn't that they were benelovent gods generously giving AA support, it's also that the higher base AA of BBs also kept them safe at the same time. Also, right now, CAs are running ahead of BBs anyways. Might as well give an incentive for CA players to ease off the throttle, and BB players to move forwards more often than in reverse. Also, while it would be giving CVs a buff, it would also be giving less nuking-per-strike. So that poor, out of formation or even recently widowed BB wouldn't be ****stomped back to port. As I said, I don't have the definite answer, but it's worth a try, in my opinion. CVs need balancing to be more present, involved, threatening, yet kept in check both damage-wise and during the course of a battle. Eviscerador, on 19 September 2016 - 09:24 AM, said: PS: complaining about BB in the cruisers is like complaining about DD in a BB. They are your counter, they are supposed to have advantage over you. No other class gets hard-countered as hard as cruisers by BBs. DD has smoke, still has the speed and maneuverability advantage over cruisers which lets them escape even when they get radar'd. BBs have a good heal, can mitigate a lot of torpedo hits by using WASD, and have a lot of AA to reduce CV effectiveness. CA/CLs? You're caught in a bad spot, which could be by an invisible BB 18km away that fires over an island, and you have a significant chance of losing a large chunk of hp. Angled or not. And while you could say "L2P, always move !!!", not every player is a demi-god MLG pro player that can remember/has the patience to mash the WASD buttons coherently and with purpose for 15 minutes straight, just to negate the possibility of a long range snipe, and expecting them to do so is ludicrous.