-
Content Сount
5,151 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
11809 -
Clan
[SICK]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Exocet6951
-
What did the 4 (2 armoury, 2 container-ship) "Santa Gift" containers bring you?
Exocet6951 replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
I got incredibly lucky, with one t6 premium, one t8 premium, some free xp and doubloons. For once, I'm screwing up the curve upwards. -
Outrageous Mission Requirements (coming from the Na forums)
Exocet6951 replied to Vinyl_ScratchPlays's topic in General Discussion
WG to its playerbase: -
Tighten Dunkerque's Dispersion Please
Exocet6951 replied to Sir_Sinksalot's topic in General Discussion
Which proves that speed = flexibility = better chances to win. I don't think anything can be done with the Dunkek other than minute tweaks. Her strength comes from the flexibility of having potent guns (ap and he), enough armor to completely ward off 356mm guns, and enough speed to be where you want and need to be. Increasing armor or accuracy would mean making it more effective as a pseudo cruiser, and more effective as a battleship. That's a very delicate balancing act. -
In a premium ship bundle. "36 premium ships for the low low price of 300€ !!!" Lmao
-
A danish ship suggestion for the pan-european dd line "Pictures"
Exocet6951 replied to Umbrascythe's topic in General Discussion
Behold the Niels Juel Slap her as a T2 BB and have her wrestle with Mikasa -
Danish meme-ships when? [rødgrød med fløde intensifies]
-
Proof of Concept Test - Cruiser plating and Inertia Fuse High Explosive (IFHE) for Tiers VIII-X, second stage of the test.
Exocet6951 replied to Tanatoy's topic in Development Blog
No matter the reaction here, or the result of the test, I appreciate the info and the way it's presented Any idea if relevant numbers from the PoC will be made public? -
RIP that one T8 DD who's life I ruined in a T6 CV by keeping him either spotted, or locked in his smoke to be torpedoed for about 5 minutes in a row. I truly laugh at people who argued that the rework lowered CVs' ability to spot. It concentrated it on a single point, and made it even more annoying. Seriously, you'll have a hard time finding a game that forced such a radically unwelcome change into a game within mere months of making it public. I could argue that CVs were flawed but fixable in the RTS iteration, but this? Jesus, I started the RN CV branch last week and I feel awful about myself.
-
WG will ruin the game with all the non historic trash spammer paper ships.
Exocet6951 replied to Edi4Play's topic in General Discussion
Imagine being so obtuse that you think some steel was put together following plans or not determines if a game is good 70 years later. -
Participating in the raffle. Also, I'm chipping in for any T6 premium in shop, or available via doubloons in the armory this year @lup3s
-
ST - Changes to Mainz, Gorizia and British Heavy Cruisers
Exocet6951 replied to Tanatoy's topic in Development Blog
Comparing 12 gun stock reload with a legendary upgrade 8 gun speed on a very fast firing BB isn't exactly a very good case. -
And once again, the Steam-player gets the better deal...
Exocet6951 replied to MrFingers's topic in General Discussion
Personnally, what I'm seeing is WG selling a copy paste digital good for 63€ base price. And to say that 12 years ago, we were outraged about a 4€ horse armor DLC... -
Narai horror stories. How badly did your team fail?
Exocet6951 replied to DanSilverwing's topic in General Discussion
Operations in random in this game just make me want to shoot myself IRL Much like randoms in general. -
Can CVs be made unreportable? I am tired of being constantly chat banned
Exocet6951 replied to Pappus's topic in General Discussion
I could have sworn that the opening post I quoted was about ships being objectively bad for the game, not about op. But hey, you do you and go off about CVs man. -
Can CVs be made unreportable? I am tired of being constantly chat banned
Exocet6951 replied to Pappus's topic in General Discussion
I'll be brief because you clearly misreading or inventing arguments: Broken != OP RN BBs with print a new ship and top kek HE are broken. Not OP, but broken. Asking for people to stop playing one broken class which you don't like, but being perfectly ok with a broken branch because you're ok with it is just hypocritical. -
Can CVs be made unreportable? I am tired of being constantly chat banned
Exocet6951 replied to Pappus's topic in General Discussion
"Your subjective opinion isn't the same as my subjective opinion, thus the situation is completely different because of arbitrary criteria that I just added right now to suit my arguments" Duly noted. So question for you...why can't two things be broken at once? -
Can CVs be made unreportable? I am tired of being constantly chat banned
Exocet6951 replied to Pappus's topic in General Discussion
So, when can I expect people to stop playing RN BBs? -
Since I value my life/sanity over a few pixels in a video game, I'll just go on vacation like I planned, and upon my return play as if there were no event.
-
There are still people using deepwater torpedoes on destroyers, despite there being an ingame written warning on the UI in battle that it's not possible. WoWS players are basically illiterate trained chimps, minus the training. Here is a fresh insight into the big thinks from the playerbase: New Mexico staying out of range, because the enemy we're outnumbering might actually fire at him, rather than the 2 cruisers tanking for him.
-
Funny (read: soul-crushing) conversation I had with a New Mexico in a T7 battle just now. Stock NM has almost 15km of range, by the way. For reference, this player's position for 90% of the match. "Not enough range, so I'm not going to get in range to fire, but rather stay out of range so the enemy can fire at me, but I can't fire at them" ... This is purgatory. I died and went to purgatory.
-
Your Server-Transfer Invitation - Limited-Time Offer
Exocet6951 replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
Do players on the NA server know how to angle yet, or not? -
Italian cruisers are intentionally that bad?
Exocet6951 replied to Fede15thPzDiv's topic in General Discussion
I just played a Zara game where a broadsiding Sinop's upper belt shattered literally ever single one of my SAP hits in 6 salvoes at 10km It got closer, I switched to AP and did pathetic damage as the DPM is so low. Enemy T8 BB with better concealment than me popped up and triple citpenned me through the bow. 10 minutes to constant firing netted me 50k damage, including 12k from a torpedo hit. I would literally have done better with a T5 cruiser with HE. What's my motivation to play this branch again? The claim that perhaps the 20s base reload T10 might be functional ? -
Moving away from the interforum meta discussion, I still find that the most enjoyable thing in this game is getting that perfect torpedo salvo just right. I love seeing those ribbons add up, climaxing (I chose that word specifically ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ) in a kill and devastating strike medal. And it can't be that instant "8 torpedoes hit and kaboom" deal either. It's those perfect hits at an angle, with every torpedo impact being distinct. Lovely.
-
-
Very interesting comments by WG's "SubOctavian" regarding "Russian BIAS"...
Exocet6951 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
"An unfortunate bug we didn't catch during testing, when we were trying to improvement gameplay by tweaking random stats that coincidentally happened to be on a Russian ship. If anything, you looking for it on the Smolensk is proof of anti-Russian sentiment on the EU server!" -S_O, probably.
