Exocet6951

Triple Conqueror. -40k HE salvoes and triple/quad fires every 30 seconds. And you have to kill an entire 6 ships worth of HP to get rid of it. Filthy.

Magical paper naval version of the IL-2M, with both rocket and cannon attack. Instead of having a single attack per squadron, it's a click and hold mechanic where the longer you click, the more dakka is sent out. Clearly super balanced.

Some of the bull**** underwater citadels were raised a bit, so now BBs can't go full broadside are receive "mAssIvE RegUlar pENs", dealing a 1/5th of their total HP pool, 50% of which is repairable.

Confused.... Is the T10 just a Moskva with a model change and different shell fuze? And the T9 just a worse version of the T10, which is a different Moskva? Are we already out of ships, that you need to make 3 times the same ship?

Not to defend actual serial seal clubbing for the sake of stats padding, but I'll be damned if I'm banned from playing ships I enjoy because a newer player on the opposing team in PvP loses. PS: If you get seal clubbed by a Kuma, perhaps the issue is with you, not the other guy.

Marketing talk for : "We'll do it from time to time when we can tie it in with a special, monetarily advantageous event" Executive talk for : "If it doesn't bring in more money, I don't give a **** " Product talk for : "Never going to happen unless marketing whines to execs to force us to do it" Developer talk for : "lol no"

Add to that the fact that warring over territory back then was still viewed as a form of polite greeting, rather than a big geopolitical no-no. Now if you were to name something after Charles IX, who's only legacy is being manipulated by his mother, being a huge ***, committing religious cleansing on protestants, and overall being the inspiration for king Joffrey from Game of Thrones, then it might be viewed in poor taste. But Napoleon? No better or worse than calling something "Queen Elizabeth"

That's a nice T12 BB there. Too bad the game stops at T10

The last time an lobby based, team based PvP game was tried (Armored Warfare), it was a disaster. People thought it would be awesome and balanced, but skill based MM doesn't just pick people from your own skill level, it picks a wide array of people equally in both teams. That resulted in matches where you got absolute potatoes 100% of the time. Every match was just massive carrying for anyone remotely close to being above average. It was exhausting, sad, and frustrating. Apply it to WoWS In every match half of your DDs and BBs are going to be downright incompetent. One quarter is going to be average, thus thus not reliable. In the end, it's going to be 3 to 6 (extremely optimistic) people actually playing the game. EVERY SINGLE MATCH Yeah no, hard pass from me. There's your argument. A few bad teams with 5 minute loses is not worth changing over to 100% match frustration.

Knugen is ready for submarines. Are you?

Almost as if that perfectly demonstrates the point of using more than a single person and his memory + feelings to determine statistical anomalies ... If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and 2 million people confirm that it's indeed a duck, perhaps you thinking that it's actually a chicken based on the fact that you heard a chicken that you though sounded like a duck once might not be totally valid. For all your valid quarrels that statistics aren't a perfect science, statistics with 2 million data points > personal feelings By an infinitely long shot.

Oh, so if I play a Midway for 100 battles without ever using planes, managing a meager 40% WR, but then I use a Hermes in T10 battles exclusively to spot DDs and manage a mindblowing 45% WR, I would have proven that the Hermes is a better ship than the Midway? Because that's exactly what you're saying. I may be taking it to a humorous extreme, but what your method would absolutely allow this, if the Hermes were capable of seeing T10. Analyzing data by limiting yourself to a single data point, while belligerently arguing against 4 entire servers worth of data, ie over 2 million data points, might quite possibly be the dumbest thing I've read all week. And mind you, I've seen some of Trump's tweets.

I tell you what, jump in a cruiser and any time you want to make a turn, force yourself to half speed during the turn, and only go back to full after your rudder is back to neutral. That'll be a good way to see how it plays...when it has speed boost ON! There's nerfing, then there's making a ship totally frustrating to play by heavily punishing most basic of actions.

Played on game with her, I had speed boost on, performed a turn after being at top speed, and until my rudder was back to neutral, I kept losing speed. Engine back knocked out, and it took me 20 seconds to go from 5 knots to 20 knots....with speed boost on. Nope. Between that, absymal games, and yet more lootbox early access content pumped out at max speed without adressing core issues, I uninstalled with 87 days of premium left. Keep it, it's clear you don't want me using it.

lol YueYang'd Just goes to show: if you endanger the master race, you get the nerf hammer. Unless you're part of the master race, in which case you get an AA mount HP nerf lololololololol

CV rework, PR, and the continued lack of vision for the Hindenburg that borders on tragic paints the picture of a studio run by bean counters who consider the company's quarterly reports to be more important than long term value and consumer satisfaction. WoWP and total war arena shows perfectly well that when WG games have actual competition, the playerbase can flock, so I wouldn't keep on treating customers like trash. WG isn't quite a one trick pony, but not far. And WG's ponies are getting old.

Oh god, imagine if this thing has Georgia accuracy...

HA ! Amateur!

Hey WG, remember that last suggestion I made, where you explained your nerfs with proper explanations, vision, metrics, goals, etc.... You printed out my two comments and used them to wipe your [edited], didn't you?

Your forum title is senior chief petty officer, and quite frankly that's the most a propos title ever.

In before French CVs with planes that go 400 knots and Italian BBs with SAP that either auto citpens cruisers, or completely fails to penetrate 100mm cruiser belt. Either way, they're getting 42s reload lmao

[Cries in lack of steel and total unwillingness to touch ranked]

The new complimentary soft drinks at WG HQ sure are an interesting choice.

It's like looking at a trainwreck of a train carrying more trains :'D