Jump to content

Exocet6951

Weekend Tester
  • Content Сount

    4,682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    9234
  • Clan

    [SICK]

2 Followers

About Exocet6951

  • Rank
    Rear Admiral
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

3,605 profile views
  1. Exocet6951

    Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration

    No one is forcing you to play. This is a game, not a job. You're not entitled to receive a salary in form of an overperforming ship at the end of the month because you played clan battles. You can earn unique stuff for playing more competitive game modes , but unique doesn't have to mean unbalanced, you daft fool. And if other ships that require less steel or coal need nerfing, then nerf those too. Stalingrad isn't special and exempt from balance just because she's expensive. That's an insane world view.
  2. Exocet6951

    Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration

    But why? Why do you deserve something overperforming and that can't be nerfed? What next? And Imperial Star Destroyer for 50k steel? The entitlement is real. "I played a game more, so I deserve something unbalanced that can never be nerfed." I'd love to have your take on Stalingrad never being buffed with global changes.
  3. Exocet6951

    Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration

    Why does effort put into the game translate to "superior equipment" in a pvp environment? If it were a tier 11 and had mirror MM, or could only be played in CB, you could have made a case for it.... But as it stands, how do you justify someone getting better equipment in random battle? How do you justify someone farming steel in ranked by essentially botting top xp star saving getting better equipment than someone who plays better and more often, but doesn't bother with the atrocious ranked battle format, or time muncher that is CB?
  4. Exocet6951

    Stabbed in the back!

    Stalingrad UP, pls buff RoF to match Zao HE DPM.
  5. Exocet6951

    Smokescreen and AAA

    Hold on, let me ask the Yamato to see how well crossing the T would have worked out for it.
  6. Exocet6951

    Best way to buff Conqueror 457mm guns?

    Once upon a time, yes. But not any more. See: Pensacola's concealment being buffed. It's just a global size + balance thing, and I just don't see why battleships should have similar, if not in some cases better concealment that a smaller class. Especially if you un-retard the branch by removing the dumb HE and doing the other things I listed in my previous message.
  7. Exocet6951

    Tox me baby one more time

    When in doubt, call everything "toxic" So, as a science experiment.... I find your post toxic and offending. what happens now?
  8. Exocet6951

    Best way to buff Conqueror 457mm guns?

    Great idea to buff the Conqueror: Literally rework the entire branch to move away from the downright ******* stupid HE spam with no citadel, cruiser concealment and zombie heal. Give them citadels, give them good heals, give them better plating, give them better AP, give them better accuracy, and tadaa! Bigger guns start having a purpose over 50% more, but smaller guns.
  9. Exocet6951

    Don’t buy PEF - she sucks hard

    Oh yeah, in that sense yes, she's perfectly average looking for a battlecruiser. And yeah I quit, but it's for a year to unwind and see if WG stops making boneheaded decisions and pushing forward with them. .... Such as pushing the PEF with modernized AA when she could have been a good counterpart to the Kongo at T5.
  10. Exocet6951

    Don’t buy PEF - she sucks hard

    As opposed to the armored behemoth that is the New Mexico? Don't take this the wrong way, but I think that playing German BBs with all around HE and overmatch protecting plating has corrupted your image of what is squishy and what is normal. Keep in mind that I don't have a horse in this race. I'm not even playing the game, so the ship being too strong or too weak is going right over my head.
  11. ? So asking for your opinion is making discussion impossible?
  12. I mean, you've come to an online public forum on a CV rework discussion thread. I feel as if explaining your view point rather than "I think it'll be great, but I won't tell you why" might be slightly more constructive and a propos.
  13. How? Seriously, explain how you think the rework will make CVs more balanced.
  14. Exocet6951

    Stalingrad sucking the fun out of clan wars.

    You could try to have a proper argument where you don't just try to throw the same word into my face despite changing the context in order to "win" the conversation, especially if you end up somewhat agreeing with me in the end. Deal issue as the "1v1" thing. You keep assuming that it's a duel. It's not. I don't know how CBs work, but at least in random, you're not going to spend 2 minutes mindlessly spamming one target that's retreating without being fired at by more than just the person you're firing at. In reality, you rarely get the straight up long range slugfest between 2 ships that ends only when both go back to stealth or one dies, as there are up to 11 other people per team that might make either ship maneuver away. So essentially, the HE spam grind against the Balancegrad in random isn't nearly effective as the burst damage across a large part of the map that 3x3 ridiculously powerful guns can deliver. Which is exactly why there's a 5 BB soft cap in a battle already.
  15. Exocet6951

    Stalingrad sucking the fun out of clan wars.

    This. As a standalone ship, you can argue that the Balancegrad is fine using such wondrous arguments such as "muh overmatch" and "muh HE spam requiring 1 ship firing at me for 3-5 minutes to kill me". But when you stop using the sterile "1v1" environment and put in in CB and random, what you effectively have is one extra BB with cruiser accuracy that takes longer to take out than a cruiser by other cruisers and can withstand BB fire better than other cruisers. Oh and it has radar. It's already not possible to track 5 enemy BBs, especially since some can fire over islands undetected, but now you have to track a 6th with shells so quick that some ships might not even have time to fully turn the rudder by the time the shells hit ? And that has BB penetration and improved ricochet angles and enormous alpha and high accuracy ? Yeah....
×